|
Nik Sharpener (was:Scanner Training Advice)
I was wondering if anyone here has used and has an opinion on Nik Sharpener Pro.
We've been using it a while now because we we're getting huge variations from
user to user in sharpening and some
I was wondering if anyone here has used and has an opinion on Nik Sharpener Pro.
We've been using it a while now because we we're getting huge variations from
user to user in sharpening and some
|
By
effzee@...
·
#1631
·
|
|
Re: Why is this (noisy k plate)?
http://home.netcom.com/~amerphoto/TinType/
http://home.netcom.com/~amerphoto/TinType/tintype.html
The third photo I deleted the CMYK Black channel.
Tintype-3.JPG
samarsh@... wrote:
http://home.netcom.com/~amerphoto/TinType/
http://home.netcom.com/~amerphoto/TinType/tintype.html
The third photo I deleted the CMYK Black channel.
Tintype-3.JPG
samarsh@... wrote:
|
By
Hector Davila
·
#1630
·
|
|
Re: Why is this (noisy k plate)?
APR, this is where most 'breakthroughs' are made. <g>
Can you explain? Film or print? Colour or g/scale? An old tin type
photo means nothing to me.
Have you tried an adjustment layer set to
APR, this is where most 'breakthroughs' are made. <g>
Can you explain? Film or print? Colour or g/scale? An old tin type
photo means nothing to me.
Have you tried an adjustment layer set to
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1629
·
|
|
Re: Scanning Class information??
Re. Scanning Class:
Try posting your questions and queries on ScanHi-End@...
Although the discussions can get equipment-specific, I have found answers to
most of my film scanning
Re. Scanning Class:
Try posting your questions and queries on ScanHi-End@...
Although the discussions can get equipment-specific, I have found answers to
most of my film scanning
|
By
Chris Brown <cb@...>
·
#1628
·
|
|
Re: Smooth Skin?
RE: APR wrote:
==========================
One item that I did not see covered in the thread is the impact of halftone
screening on smooth tones. You may want to investigate round dot (round
RE: APR wrote:
==========================
One item that I did not see covered in the thread is the impact of halftone
screening on smooth tones. You may want to investigate round dot (round
|
By
Gordon Pritchard <gordon_pritchard@...>
·
#1627
·
|
|
Re: Smooth Skin?
Thanks everyone for the "Smooth SKin" techniques, I'm now an expert!
Thanks everyone for the "Smooth SKin" techniques, I'm now an expert!
|
By
Hector Davila
·
#1626
·
|
|
Why is this?
Why is this?
I'm just expermenting.
I take an old Tin Type photo.
I then adjusted in Lab for contrast.
I then change to CMYK and
I deleted the Black channel
(since I see a lot of scratches and spots
Why is this?
I'm just expermenting.
I take an old Tin Type photo.
I then adjusted in Lab for contrast.
I then change to CMYK and
I deleted the Black channel
(since I see a lot of scratches and spots
|
By
Hector Davila
·
#1625
·
|
|
Re: Scanner Training Advice
Martin replies:
comes to the
Scanview flatbeds
photographic
off!
magnified, so your
focused and
I don't think that things have changed, even on the top of the line
model purchased less than six
Martin replies:
comes to the
Scanview flatbeds
photographic
off!
magnified, so your
focused and
I don't think that things have changed, even on the top of the line
model purchased less than six
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1624
·
|
|
Re: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
on 9/10/01 1:39 pm, samarsh@... at samarsh@... wrote:
Sorry, I didn't make myself very clear on this point.
The light source on the flatbeds is extremely critical when it comes
on 9/10/01 1:39 pm, samarsh@... at samarsh@... wrote:
Sorry, I didn't make myself very clear on this point.
The light source on the flatbeds is extremely critical when it comes
|
By
Martin Orpen <orpy@...>
·
#1623
·
|
|
Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
Stephen writes,
how I could maximise the training. I know many on this list attend
specific training or seminars - are there any tips from all those
people who have 'been there - done that'.>>
As
Stephen writes,
how I could maximise the training. I know many on this list attend
specific training or seminars - are there any tips from all those
people who have 'been there - done that'.>>
As
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1622
·
|
|
Re: Scanning Class information??
luck (all
one in
care to
Sterling-Ledet but am
a more
working,
added to my
If you have attended one of Dan's colour correction workshops -
then I presume that you are at a certain level of experience
luck (all
one in
care to
Sterling-Ledet but am
a more
working,
added to my
If you have attended one of Dan's colour correction workshops -
then I presume that you are at a certain level of experience
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1621
·
|
|
Re: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
I originally wrote:
thoughts on
attend
those
Martin replies:
LeafCapture on the
demos and would
Thanks for the reply Martin. So, did the LEAF training simply take
you through the printed exercise
I originally wrote:
thoughts on
attend
those
Martin replies:
LeafCapture on the
demos and would
Thanks for the reply Martin. So, did the LEAF training simply take
you through the printed exercise
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1620
·
|
|
Re: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
I have no experience of CreoScitex training (apart from LeafCapture on the
Volare camera). However, I have been to a number of scanner demos and would
offer the following advice:
Take your own
I have no experience of CreoScitex training (apart from LeafCapture on the
Volare camera). However, I have been to a number of scanner demos and would
offer the following advice:
Take your own
|
By
Martin Orpen <orpy@...>
·
#1619
·
|
|
Smooth Skin?
Hector Davila writes,
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?>>
A method that I illustrated at Seybold is similar to the
Hector Davila writes,
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?>>
A method that I illustrated at Seybold is similar to the
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1618
·
|
|
Scanning Class information??
This individual has previously taken my ACT course.
Dan Margulis
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 3:24 PM
RE: Class
This individual has previously taken my ACT course.
Dan Margulis
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 3:24 PM
RE: Class
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1616
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?
Dave Badger writes,
because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I believe this to be true and think that, for example, cyan in reds
being replaced partially
Dave Badger writes,
because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I believe this to be true and think that, for example, cyan in reds
being replaced partially
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1617
·
|
|
Re: Smooth Skin?
APR wrote:
There are many ways to smooth out complexions but if there are real
physical skin features (not just noise) that need to be smoothed then
blurring the AB channels is not going to do it. One
APR wrote:
There are many ways to smooth out complexions but if there are real
physical skin features (not just noise) that need to be smoothed then
blurring the AB channels is not going to do it. One
|
By
Lee Varis
·
#1615
·
|
|
Smooth skin?
<: Smooth Skin?
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
Is it bluring AB channels?
Hector Davila>
The Gaussian Blur Filter. Don't make selections to target skin
areas(doing that is like
<: Smooth Skin?
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
Is it bluring AB channels?
Hector Davila>
The Gaussian Blur Filter. Don't make selections to target skin
areas(doing that is like
|
By
John Opitz <jas10286@...>
·
#1614
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR
Oops, to fast..
I wrote
scanners or the American GCA (Gray Component Addition) and it's opponent
GCR.
Last thing was wrong,
GCR has nothing to do with GCA, it's the same as UCR, I shouldn't mention
Oops, to fast..
I wrote
scanners or the American GCA (Gray Component Addition) and it's opponent
GCR.
Last thing was wrong,
GCR has nothing to do with GCA, it's the same as UCR, I shouldn't mention
|
By
Ruud uit het Instituut
·
#1613
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR
Dan Margulis wrote
on what constitutes a "UCR" sep, other than that it's a subset of "GCR".
You're right. IMO the terminology went wrong when vendors started to make
their own definitions. I worked
Dan Margulis wrote
on what constitutes a "UCR" sep, other than that it's a subset of "GCR".
You're right. IMO the terminology went wrong when vendors started to make
their own definitions. I worked
|
By
Ruud uit het Instituut
·
#1612
·
|