|
Re: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
I originally wrote:
thoughts on
attend
those
Martin replies:
LeafCapture on the
demos and would
Thanks for the reply Martin. So, did the LEAF training simply take
you through the printed exercise
I originally wrote:
thoughts on
attend
those
Martin replies:
LeafCapture on the
demos and would
Thanks for the reply Martin. So, did the LEAF training simply take
you through the printed exercise
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1620
·
|
|
Re: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
I have no experience of CreoScitex training (apart from LeafCapture on the
Volare camera). However, I have been to a number of scanner demos and would
offer the following advice:
Take your own
I have no experience of CreoScitex training (apart from LeafCapture on the
Volare camera). However, I have been to a number of scanner demos and would
offer the following advice:
Take your own
|
By
Martin Orpen <orpy@...>
·
#1619
·
|
|
Smooth Skin?
Hector Davila writes,
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?>>
A method that I illustrated at Seybold is similar to the
Hector Davila writes,
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?>>
A method that I illustrated at Seybold is similar to the
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1618
·
|
|
Scanning Class information??
This individual has previously taken my ACT course.
Dan Margulis
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 3:24 PM
RE: Class
This individual has previously taken my ACT course.
Dan Margulis
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 3:24 PM
RE: Class
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1616
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?
Dave Badger writes,
because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I believe this to be true and think that, for example, cyan in reds
being replaced partially
Dave Badger writes,
because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I believe this to be true and think that, for example, cyan in reds
being replaced partially
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1617
·
|
|
Re: Smooth Skin?
APR wrote:
There are many ways to smooth out complexions but if there are real
physical skin features (not just noise) that need to be smoothed then
blurring the AB channels is not going to do it. One
APR wrote:
There are many ways to smooth out complexions but if there are real
physical skin features (not just noise) that need to be smoothed then
blurring the AB channels is not going to do it. One
|
By
Lee Varis
·
#1615
·
|
|
Smooth skin?
<: Smooth Skin?
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
Is it bluring AB channels?
Hector Davila>
The Gaussian Blur Filter. Don't make selections to target skin
areas(doing that is like
<: Smooth Skin?
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
Is it bluring AB channels?
Hector Davila>
The Gaussian Blur Filter. Don't make selections to target skin
areas(doing that is like
|
By
John Opitz <jas10286@...>
·
#1614
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR
Oops, to fast..
I wrote
scanners or the American GCA (Gray Component Addition) and it's opponent
GCR.
Last thing was wrong,
GCR has nothing to do with GCA, it's the same as UCR, I shouldn't mention
Oops, to fast..
I wrote
scanners or the American GCA (Gray Component Addition) and it's opponent
GCR.
Last thing was wrong,
GCR has nothing to do with GCA, it's the same as UCR, I shouldn't mention
|
By
Ruud uit het Instituut
·
#1613
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR
Dan Margulis wrote
on what constitutes a "UCR" sep, other than that it's a subset of "GCR".
You're right. IMO the terminology went wrong when vendors started to make
their own definitions. I worked
Dan Margulis wrote
on what constitutes a "UCR" sep, other than that it's a subset of "GCR".
You're right. IMO the terminology went wrong when vendors started to make
their own definitions. I worked
|
By
Ruud uit het Instituut
·
#1612
·
|
|
Smooth Skin?
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?
Thanks
Hector Davila
What's the best way to smooth skin on photos?
I've seen *those* web sites where the girls skin looks real smooth.
How do you do that? Is it bluring AB channels?
Thanks
Hector Davila
|
By
Hector Davila
·
#1611
·
|
|
Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?)
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
From: INTERNET:samarsh@...
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 4:09 AM
RE: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR
--------------- Forwarded Message ---------------
From: INTERNET:samarsh@...
To: Dan Margulis, 76270,1033
Date: Mon, Oct 8, 2001, 4:09 AM
RE: Scanner Training Advice (was: UCR
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1610
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR - So RAW is really UCR...
data which
calculated
Thanks Dan. It was a shock to me to find that you could turn UCR
and GCR functions off for the CMYK conversion...I took the
setting at 'face value' (silly me).
Then I blew the
data which
calculated
Thanks Dan. It was a shock to me to find that you could turn UCR
and GCR functions off for the CMYK conversion...I took the
setting at 'face value' (silly me).
Then I blew the
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1609
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?
on 10/6/01 3:00 PM, Dan Margulis wrote:
I have been using Photoshop's Medium Generation for a long time now because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I
on 10/6/01 3:00 PM, Dan Margulis wrote:
I have been using Photoshop's Medium Generation for a long time now because
GCR is supposed to give you better saturation and depth in the darker
colors. I
|
By
Dave Badger <dbadge@...>
·
#1608
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?
Stephen writes,
have to agree with your take on their default tables black generation. I
have not been able to make a custom black generation curve in Photoshop
that even comes close.>>
The question
Stephen writes,
have to agree with your take on their default tables black generation. I
have not been able to make a custom black generation curve in Photoshop
that even comes close.>>
The question
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1607
·
|
|
Re: Profiles for digicams
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...> writes:
[Re: Epson's "PIM" system]
After reading the PDF paper on their website, I think the person
who told me about it was also
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...> writes:
[Re: Epson's "PIM" system]
After reading the PDF paper on their website, I think the person
who told me about it was also
|
By
Ron Bean <rbean@...>
·
#1606
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR...or Neither - RAW CMYK?
Dan writes:
printers use
almost
ordinarily a
black
than anything
make the seps,
printers don't
prepress, and
Dan, this is a good opening for bringing up a subject which has
been bugging me for a
Dan writes:
printers use
almost
ordinarily a
black
than anything
make the seps,
printers don't
prepress, and
Dan, this is a good opening for bringing up a subject which has
been bugging me for a
|
By
samarsh@...
·
#1605
·
|
|
Re: UCR vs GCR
Gordo writes,
I doubt that anyone has reliable information on this. You may in fact be
the first person in the history of the world who has ever asked this
question.
opposed to GCR?>>
In the US I
Gordo writes,
I doubt that anyone has reliable information on this. You may in fact be
the first person in the history of the world who has ever asked this
question.
opposed to GCR?>>
In the US I
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1604
·
|
|
Re: 16 bit challenge
Hi Jan,
Just wanted to say that my scan was from the negative not a print. I
let the scanner remove the color cast and then I did a eyedropper color
balance. The $1800 cost of my scanner out weighs
Hi Jan,
Just wanted to say that my scan was from the negative not a print. I
let the scanner remove the color cast and then I did a eyedropper color
balance. The $1800 cost of my scanner out weighs
|
By
gowens01GO@...
·
#1603
·
|
|
Re: More Seybold Information
Dan: < For those who are interested in more information about Seybold, with
an emphasis on large-format digital printers, list member Harald Johnson has
put together an extensive report, which I
Dan: < For those who are interested in more information about Seybold, with
an emphasis on large-format digital printers, list member Harald Johnson has
put together an extensive report, which I
|
By
hjswim2@...
·
#1602
·
|
|
More Seybold Information
For those who are interested in more information about Seybold, with an
emphasis on large-format digital printers, list member Harald Johnson has
put together an extensive report, which I have read
For those who are interested in more information about Seybold, with an
emphasis on large-format digital printers, list member Harald Johnson has
put together an extensive report, which I have read
|
By
Dan Margulis <76270.1033@...>
·
#1601
·
|