Re: This e-mail list
Jan Sage
Couldn’t agree more!
Jan
From: mailto:cnswplayers@...
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: [cnswplayers] Re: This e-mail list
Hmmm - maybe. I had surfiechick as a nom-de-net for years on the notts list
because I felt I had no street cred and would never had posted if I had had to
use my real name. Puzzling for others, yes, but I would otherwise have kept
silent. Why do we need to "figure out who has said what"? It is the comment, not the
person, we should be assessing as we read. The moderator can decide who
oversteps the mark and block postings if appropriate.
0400 825
920
AUSTRALIA: RESETTLING BOAT PEOPLE
SINCE 1788
-------- Original message -------- From: "Roberta Flint roberta_flint@... [cnswplayers]" <cnswplayers@...> Date:09/05/2016 7:28 AM (GMT+10:00) To: cnswplayers@... Cc: Subject: Re: [cnswplayers] Re: This e-mail list Agree being as open an inclusive as possible to start with and only
filtering if an issue emerges.
The one protocol I would suggest is people sign
their name to any comment or message. Sometimes it is hard to figure out who has
said what, or will the new platform remedy this in some way?
Roberta
Sent from my iPad
|
||
|