|
[SDRSharp] Re: hi a new on eto sdrsharp and trying to get an rtl dongle to work
Not sure the migration to the new NEO format is at the group level.... from what I understand from other groups, it looks like it is done at the user level. So the same group can be seen in two differ
Not sure the migration to the new NEO format is at the group level.... from what I understand from other groups, it looks like it is done at the user level. So the same group can be seen in two differ
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10628
·
|
|
ADS-B and the Fitipower FC0013 tuner
Bobbie, �� thanks for your answer. I made a further test, which showed that at 1090 MHz the PLL of the FC0013 is unlocked. So probably my unit is on the low side of the tolerance as far as the fre
Bobbie, �� thanks for your answer. I made a further test, which showed that at 1090 MHz the PLL of the FC0013 is unlocked. So probably my unit is on the low side of the tolerance as far as the fre
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10584
·
|
|
ADS-B and the Fitipower FC0013 tuner
Is anybody able to receive the 1090 MHz ADS-B signals from the planes using a Fitipower FC0013 based dongle ? I have two dongles, one with the R820T tuner and another with the FC0013. The R820T receiv
Is anybody able to receive the 1090 MHz ADS-B signals from the planes using a Fitipower FC0013 based dongle ? I have two dongles, one with the R820T tuner and another with the FC0013. The R820T receiv
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10575
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Zadig problem?
Agreed.
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10359
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] SDR-5+ HF receiver - All Mode Software Radio
Errr... not really...� the so called "processing gain" is given by this formula : �� SNR = (6.02N + 1.76) + 10*log10(Fs/Fd) dB Plugging into it the numbers, a downsampling of 40:1 gives a dB inc
Errr... not really...� the so called "processing gain" is given by this formula : �� SNR = (6.02N + 1.76) + 10*log10(Fs/Fd) dB Plugging into it the numbers, a downsampling of 40:1 gives a dB inc
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10290
·
|
|
Computer Requirements to run SDR#
� This too is not too bad : https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15089947/sim1.mp4
� This too is not too bad : https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15089947/sim1.mp4
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10208
·
|
|
Scopeview plugin speed control: how it works?
Yes, with Embarcadero/VCL usually you get the "Canvas does not allow drawing" message, when a thread tries to modify the canvas owned by the GUI thread. The work around is to have the timer thread set
Yes, with Embarcadero/VCL usually you get the "Canvas does not allow drawing" message, when a thread tries to modify the canvas owned by the GUI thread. The work around is to have the timer thread set
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10205
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
This should be the Tunisian station. That file does not have in its headers compatible information about the central frequency, so the frequency indicated on the scale is not correct. ��
This should be the Tunisian station. That file does not have in its headers compatible information about the central frequency, so the frequency indicated on the scale is not correct. ��
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10196
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Well, congratulations Ian (and Youssef and any other involved in the development of SDR#). I tested that WAV file against both SDR# and Studio 1 (optimized C++ code), on a 8 year old AMD Athlon, under
Well, congratulations Ian (and Youssef and any other involved in the development of SDR#). I tested that WAV file against both SDR# and Studio 1 (optimized C++ code), on a 8 year old AMD Athlon, under
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10132
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Many thanks Ian.� I am just now downloading the 1.3 GB (thanks God my ADSL is rather fast), to perform tests with my programs.
Many thanks Ian.� I am just now downloading the 1.3 GB (thanks God my ADSL is rather fast), to perform tests with my programs.
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10131
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
You make me remembering of when (in my young age...) I was discovered� correcting errors in a deck of punched cards by reinserting back the punched chips into the card holes, and hand punching new h
You make me remembering of when (in my young age...) I was discovered� correcting errors in a deck of punched cards by reinserting back the punched chips into the card holes, and hand punching new h
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10130
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Could you please make available that IQ recording ? Thanks. BTW, it looks like it was recorded in Italy...
Could you please make available that IQ recording ? Thanks. BTW, it looks like it was recorded in Italy...
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10089
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Never tried VS2010, must admit. My experience stops at VS2008, and that was really a non-visual development tools, despite its name.� But I doubt it can compete, in terms of user-friendliness and sp
Never tried VS2010, must admit. My experience stops at VS2008, and that was really a non-visual development tools, despite its name.� But I doubt it can compete, in terms of user-friendliness and sp
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10086
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
I have practically no experience with Visual C++ of Micro$oft (whose only "Visual" attribute is in the name only...), so cannot tell you if it allows, at least in its latest release, to write a C++ pr
I have practically no experience with Visual C++ of Micro$oft (whose only "Visual" attribute is in the name only...), so cannot tell you if it allows, at least in its latest release, to write a C++ pr
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10083
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Yes, correct. That's why I have ever avoided using GDI+, sticking to bare GDI. GDI+ has more functions, granted, but if you, like me, do not like filled spectrums, or other embellishments that add not
Yes, correct. That's why I have ever avoided using GDI+, sticking to bare GDI. GDI+ has more functions, granted, but if you, like me, do not like filled spectrums, or other embellishments that add not
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10079
·
|
|
Computer Requirements to run SDR#
Usually all the fancy features of game oriented modern GPUs are not used in an SDR program. I don't know what happens under the curtains when you use .NET, but if you practice a safe life and do not u
Usually all the fancy features of game oriented modern GPUs are not used in an SDR program. I don't know what happens under the curtains when you use .NET, but if you practice a safe life and do not u
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #10071
·
|
|
TV signal viewing?
I asked a local radio and TV reseller here, and he told me that almost all new TV sets are already equipped with a T2-compliant decoder.
I asked a local radio and TV reseller here, and he told me that almost all new TV sets are already equipped with a T2-compliant decoder.
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #9964
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: Make it understandble PLEASE!
Yes, the book is dated, the technology had advanced, but the fundamental algorithms are still the same... That book is meant, as the title implies, for those who want to taste the water with their fee
Yes, the book is dated, the technology had advanced, but the fundamental algorithms are still the same... That book is meant, as the title implies, for those who want to taste the water with their fee
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #9815
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Make it understandble PLEASE!
I could suggest the following books, the first of which is also available as a free download in PDF format. http://tinyurl.com/jwqcfhf��� available also as free download at� http://www.dspguid
I could suggest the following books, the first of which is also available as a free download in PDF format. http://tinyurl.com/jwqcfhf��� available also as free download at� http://www.dspguid
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #9808
·
|
|
[SDRSharp] Re: From a SDR Grapevine...
Oh, sorry... I had given for granted that those acronyms were more or less known as they are used very often in the SDR field, but maybe I was wrong. So, here it comes an attempt to a short explanatio
Oh, sorry... I had given for granted that those acronyms were more or less known as they are used very often in the SDR field, but maybe I was wrong. So, here it comes an attempt to a short explanatio
|
By
Alberto I2PHD
· #9787
·
|