locked
Just getting on board...
Bruce Tanner
Nice to know of the dedicated group for SDR#. Thanks for the setup...
|
|
locked
Re: Just getting on board...
sdrsharp
I felt the need to create a dedicated group instead of polluting others ones (softrock40 and funcube.)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Youssef
--- In SDRSharp@..., "k2bet1" <bet110@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
SDR#
PY4ZBZ
Very interesting software! Congratulations!
73 de Roland PY4ZBZ
|
|
locked
Re: SDR#
Philip
Agreed, a breath of fresh air...
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Good luck with it's developement.. Regards Philip G4JVF
--- In SDRSharp@..., "PY4ZBZ" <py4zbz@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: [SDRSharp] Re: Just getting on board...
Bruce Tanner
I think it is a good idea... I am sure others will add your site to
the growing list. Do you plan to announce each new version update,
or should we just check it periodically? Thanks for you work and
offer to the SDRers of the World.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bruce --- On 1/31/2012 3:01 AM, sdrsharp wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: Just getting on board...
sdrsharp
Well, just check the site.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The current version is 1.0.0.151. It fixes some phasing problem when SDR# is run for a long time (> 24h.) This bug was introduced in the last refactoring. It took some time to figure it out, but it's fixed now. Youssef
--- In SDRSharp@..., Bruce Tanner <bet110@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: [SDRSharp] Re: Just getting on board...
Bruce Tanner
OK. Need to upgrade.. thanks.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-- On 1/31/2012 10:19 AM, sdrsharp wrote:
|
|
locked
Cannot get SDR # to control Softrock
Ed Murphy
Hi All,
Do I have to add extra files to SDR # before I can get frequency control of the Si570 ? If I run say WR Plus and set to a frequency then exit WR Plus then launch SDR # it will show the station selected provided the Center and Frequency windows are at 0. Selecting the Front panel Softrock option and typing in the same frequency of interest causes the previous station to disappear and I cannot manage to set the Si570 to recover the station. Can you tell me what the oscillator multiplier is set to and can I change it ? Is there some information that explains how this software is setup ? Thanks Ed GM3SBC
|
|
locked
Re: [SDRSharp] Cannot get SDR # to control Softrock
Bruce Tanner
This newly posted, Ed.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If you have a Softrock with Si-570 you should be able to just select it as the 'Front End' and it will work. You will need to have previously installed the libusb(0) driver but it sounds like you have already done that. You can enter the frequency you wish to begin with in the bottom window (Center or LO) and then use either the the digital pic arrows to change frequency, or, you can grab and slide the frequency scale at the bottom of the panadapter to do the same thing. That latter mode is very fast. If you want to change bands just enter the full Hz/Sec numerals for the frequency segment of the interest into the lower, 'center', window and then move your cursor to the left of the window and 'click' that should establish the frequency in MHz and if you then move your cursor to the top window 'tune' and click that same frequency will show up in that window from which you can then tune around on the segment you are centered on. There will likely be enhancements to all of this but in my case, for the present, I have created a text file with the setting, as above, for the various band segments, frequencies and discrete stations of interest and then use the 'copy and paste' method to change major changes in bands or frequencies. Be sure to set the proper 'Input' for your Softrock I/Q input port. That is located on the control panel below the frequency windows. Bruce, K2BET http://sdrsharp.com/ On 1/31/2012 12:28 PM, Ed wrote:
|
|
locked
Greetings from a Canadian Linux user
ve7it <trashbag@...>
Hello Youssef,
I would like to congratulate you on your SDR# project. From the videos, it has one of the nicest waterfall and spectrum displays I have seen. I think the persistence effect Is very useful as most of our ham modes have time varying amplitudes: CW, SSB, even AM show better with some persistence. I would love to try running your project under mono on Linux as I don't run windows here. I suspect the audio portion of the code would have the most impact unless mono encapsulates it in a way that is useful for SDR work. I would like to offer some help in porting/adapting the project to run under Linux. I am not fluent in C#, but looks like a "comfortable language". I hope that some mono, C#, Linux gurus will join the effort. cheers Lawrence VE7IT Nanoose Bay BC, Canada
|
|
locked
Some videos of SDR# available
Bruce Tanner
If you are interested in seeing some video clips of SDR# in action, consider going to 'K2BET1', U-Tube channel. I have placed several there over the past week which demonstrate the software with a Softrock Ensemble receiver as well as Fun Cube Dongle.
http://www.youtube.com/user/k2bet1/featured Bruce
|
|
locked
Re: Greetings from a Canadian Linux user
sdrsharp
Hi Lawrence,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In fact, the audio section works under mono without any problem. I'm using PortAudio library which is available on all modern distros. The issue is with graphics. They're slow as hell under mono. You will only need to symlink "msvcrt.dll" to "libc.so". Good luck. Youssef
--- In SDRSharp@..., "ve7it" <trashbag@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
Re: Just getting on board...
Rob Engberts <pa0rwe@...>
Hi Youssef,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I found your SDR# group and shared it too! Regards, Rob
--- In SDRSharp@..., "sdrsharp" <sdrsharp@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
An amazing demo of I/Q balancing in SDR# !
Bruce Tanner
|
|
locked
SDRSharp works well with the SDR-4 receiver
Chris <chrism@...>
I only found out about the SDRSharp program today.
Very nice and easy to get running. I like the automatic IQ balance and the clean look! I'm running it with a SDR-4 receiver on Windows XP. The only thing I had to do was to cut and paste the ExtIO_Si570.dll file into the same folder as SDRSharp. For your information I'm one of the owners of Cross Country Wireless who make the SDR-4 and a crystal controlled SDR receiver. With the receivers we include a CD disc of SDR and other software to get new users started. Can I include SDRSharp on the disc? 73, Chris, G4HYG
|
|
locked
Re: SDRSharp works well with the SDR-4 receiver
sdrsharp
Hi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
No problem for me. Just add a note about the download location: http://sdrsharp.com Btw, You won't need any other dll than what's in the zip. It just runs out of the box. Youssef
--- In SDRSharp@..., "Chris" <chrism@...> wrote:
|
|
locked
A new version (rev. 162)
sdrsharp
I've just added a new decimation mechanism that allows using high order filters with less CPU usage. I invite users to test it heavily.
Enjoy! Youssef
|
|
locked
SDR# vs. PowerSDR image rejection
applewiz2000 <rob.m0rzf@...>
Hi Folks!
My first post around here! I am comparing PowerSDR-IQ v2 beta with SDR# and the new software does have a better image rejection performance. It is used with my old Softrock Mk.3 transceiver, see www.m0rzf.co.uk for details. PSDR is a right royal pain in the a*se for losing the plot and having no image rejection. Softrock type receivers make it worse by having bad quality I/Q signals. Also the Si570 oscillator produces a DC "gap" when tuning. The combination destroys the image rejection of PSDR. Picture of performance at 28.120MHz in photo section. ~Rob
|
|
locked
Re: [SDRSharp] SDR# vs. PowerSDR image rejection
cbayona.cb <CBayona@...>
Nice projects on your site.
QSD = Quadrature Sampling Detector. At 09:09 AM 2/19/2012, you wrote: Hi Folks!Cecil k5nwa < <http://www.softrockradio.org/>http://www.softrockradio.org/ > < http://thepartsplace.k5nwa.com/ > < http://parts.softrockradio.org/ > Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
|
|
locked
Re: A new version (rev. 162)
Philip
Thanks for the updates Youssef
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Philip G4JVF
--- In SDRSharp@..., "sdrsharp" <sdrsharp@...> wrote:
|
|