|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
OK, I saw the discussion as moving into the programmers' realm and your question hit me out of left field. It might be interesting to try to explain what the programmer would have to
OK, I saw the discussion as moving into the programmers' realm and your question hit me out of left field. It might be interesting to try to explain what the programmer would have to
|
By
jdow
·
#40874
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Joanne : I'm not a programmer, just a basic user.
But I first thought the reply from Prog ("Buffer the samples you get and only process when you reach the right size") was intended
Joanne : I'm not a programmer, just a basic user.
But I first thought the reply from Prog ("Buffer the samples you get and only process when you reach the right size") was intended
|
By
Patrick
·
#40873
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
"Concretely, how is this done?"
I guess it was you. If you are a programmer I'd expect you to understand concepts such as multiple buffers, fifos, and the like. If you are not
"Concretely, how is this done?"
I guess it was you. If you are a programmer I'd expect you to understand concepts such as multiple buffers, fifos, and the like. If you are not
|
By
jdow
·
#40872
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Hi Scott,
Yes, I use the CTCSS plugin simply to help identify unknown signals on VHF (mainly ski resorts, mountain rescue).
I know that KG Tone is a good alternative, but I really appreciate CTCSS
Hi Scott,
Yes, I use the CTCSS plugin simply to help identify unknown signals on VHF (mainly ski resorts, mountain rescue).
I know that KG Tone is a good alternative, but I really appreciate CTCSS
|
By
Patrick
·
#40871
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
I won't expect all the end users to be also programmers. I will check with the dev.
I won't expect all the end users to be also programmers. I will check with the dev.
|
By
prog
·
#40870
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
<< This is for plugins developers >>
Aaah OK !
For those who wonder where the CTCSS plugin developer's answer comes from :
<< This is for plugins developers >>
Aaah OK !
For those who wonder where the CTCSS plugin developer's answer comes from :
|
By
Patrick
·
#40869
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Patrick,
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to accomplish with the CTCSS plug-in. Is it simply to help identify unknown signals or are you trying to use it for actual tone squelch purposes?
Patrick,
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to accomplish with the CTCSS plug-in. Is it simply to help identify unknown signals or are you trying to use it for actual tone squelch purposes?
|
By
Scott/KC1UA
·
#40868
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
This is for plugins developers.
This is for plugins developers.
|
By
prog
·
#40867
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
@jdow : Who is your comment for ?
@jdow : Who is your comment for ?
|
By
Patrick
·
#40866
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
You are kidding, right? Or else you are 100.000% not a programmer. Which is it so I can pitch my reply to your level.
{o.o}
You are kidding, right? Or else you are 100.000% not a programmer. Which is it so I can pitch my reply to your level.
{o.o}
|
By
jdow
·
#40865
·
|
|
Re: Virtual Audio Cable ( Muzychenko)
Derek,
Have you recently updated your version of VAC? I had an issue with VAC a few months ago and nothing I did could fix it, until I thought of updating my version of VAC
Derek,
Have you recently updated your version of VAC? I had an issue with VAC a few months ago and nothing I did could fix it, until I thought of updating my version of VAC
|
By
Chris van Lint
·
#40864
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Concretely, how is this done ?
Concretely, how is this done ?
|
By
Patrick
·
#40863
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
So basically this plugin never worked with low latency sound cards.
=> Buffer the samples you get and only process when your reach the right size.
So basically this plugin never worked with low latency sound cards.
=> Buffer the samples you get and only process when your reach the right size.
|
By
prog
·
#40862
·
|
|
Re: Virtual Audio Cable ( Muzychenko)
Yes everything was fine The only thing I can think of is I have installed the new version of Jaero & Jaero Display
both work ok but showing only low volume Tekmanoid especially very dull waterfall I
Yes everything was fine The only thing I can think of is I have installed the new version of Jaero & Jaero Display
both work ok but showing only low volume Tekmanoid especially very dull waterfall I
|
By
Derek Henderson
·
#40861
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Indeed ! I just found his message.
" As for the CTCSS plug-in, I don't see an immediate solution to fixing this.
The method the plug-in uses requires a few zero crossings to occur in the audio buffer
Indeed ! I just found his message.
" As for the CTCSS plug-in, I don't see an immediate solution to fixing this.
The method the plug-in uses requires a few zero crossings to occur in the audio buffer
|
By
Patrick
·
#40860
·
|
|
Re: Virtual Audio Cable ( Muzychenko)
Not going to help much Derek but I haven't noticed any issues with VAC/Windows 10 when using it to route audio to various decoder software (including Tekmanoid/Jaero/DSD) on three different
Not going to help much Derek but I haven't noticed any issues with VAC/Windows 10 when using it to route audio to various decoder software (including Tekmanoid/Jaero/DSD) on three different
|
By
6vc8
·
#40859
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
.....................He replied to your post on Radioreference
.....................He replied to your post on Radioreference
|
By
6vc8
·
#40858
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
No one knows how to reach thewraith2008 ?
Last year, he quickly stepped in to make changes to his Frequency Manager and Frequency Scanner plugins to address Telerik issues, among others, and I seem to
No one knows how to reach thewraith2008 ?
Last year, he quickly stepped in to make changes to his Frequency Manager and Frequency Scanner plugins to address Telerik issues, among others, and I seem to
|
By
Patrick
·
#40857
·
|
|
Re: Optimizing Samplerate to avoid crackling
Increased to 100ms (from 50ms default) and indeed has improved, now I am using SR 384Kbps and seems to be better, still testing
Thanks
--
Juan, EA5XQ
AirSpy Hf+ Discovery
MLA 30+ / PA0RDT MiniWhip
Increased to 100ms (from 50ms default) and indeed has improved, now I am using SR 384Kbps and seems to be better, still testing
Thanks
--
Juan, EA5XQ
AirSpy Hf+ Discovery
MLA 30+ / PA0RDT MiniWhip
|
By
Juan - EA5XQ
·
#40856
·
|
|
Re: CTCSS plugin
#sdrsharp
Supporting arbitrary buffer sizes is part of the plugin specifications.
Supporting arbitrary buffer sizes is part of the plugin specifications.
|
By
prog
·
#40855
·
|