That overall cost sounds reasonable, I think I'll go for those from Farnell as I'm not in too much of a hurry... (I have two Airspy R2s). Many thanks indeed for the link, much appreciated. Terry

You're probably aware, but just incase... Farnell list them for 38p each with a MOQ of 5 so £1.90+P&P+VAT (£1.90 + £3.95 + £1.17 = £7.02), but they're on back order till mid June. Quicker than 8

Hi Rob, If it's for receive only an active dipole may perform better. If it's also for transmit, these notes may be of interest. http://www.g8jnj.net/Loft%20antenna.pdf Regards, Martin - G8JNJ

Folding it back is not likely to work all that well. In the limiting case you get effectively 34.5' long transmission line on each side of the dipole. There are some people who push a fractal antenna

I suppose you could turn that setting on and turn off access for all the "Apps" loaded on the machine individually if you wish to maintain your privacy. {^_^}

With the notations on the pictures it was not immediately obvious that was the issue you were talking about. {o.o}

Guys, Many thanks for your information and links etc. I checked the PPTC device and there is continuity across it, so that's a good thing. However, take a look at the attached pic, I think it leaves

Given the choice of the two, I think I'd zig-zag the length, rather than double it back. Doubling back is liable to cause cancellations and reduction of signal strength at some frequencies. HST, for

<< I fail to see a problem. If you are worried about the -18 dB vs -24 dB discrepancy, ignore it. Neither has a notation for reference level. Obviously they are using different reference levels. Add

Ah, that sounds like Microsoft - making the world safe for malware. {+_+}

I fail to see a problem. If you are worried about the -18 dB vs -24 dB discrepancy, ignore it. Neither has a notation for reference level. Obviously they are using different reference levels. Add or

Hello, I've had to relocate my 133' 80-6m dipole to the attic after coming down outside in a winter storm. The run of attic along the roof peak is 64' inside. I've extended the dipole end to end for

I'd measure the pptc first and if it is open then pop the unit in a sealed airtight bag and put in the freezer for a couple of days - then remove it and allow 24 hours for it to return naturally to

The NESDR SMArTee has a 4.3V bias-t. I've just spotted on the Spyverter specs that volatage requirement is as follows: Bias-tee voltage: 4.2v to 5.5vI was only worried as none of the NooElec devices

The Spyverter is compatible with pretty much everything. If the device has a it's own 5v bias-t, then great, if no, then there's an external micro-usb for power.

Hi, Does anyone know if the Spyverter is compatible with NooElec SDR's? The specific combination I've got in mind is to use the Spyverter with NESDR SMArTee. Thanks in advance!

Dear Developers Long ago we requested the feature for data logging out of AstroSpy and we received the answer, that all the development power was focused on the release of the HF+. Because the HF+ is

Decoding is also OK when running a Spyserver ...

Because a pic probably explains better ...

Hi there ! Yesterday, after W10 April update (v1803), I noticed that both RDS spy (via MPX Output plugin) and DSD+ did not work. Here is the explanation a kind guy sent me : in Win 10 1803 Build