In the old days Andy I guess people had to publish on paper to get their work recognised. These days people just stick it on their blog. The trouble is nobody can find their blog. As you know I have

Hi Keith, I posted something about BladeRf on the BATC website sometime ago, there were a few comments but not much interest. Personally I am too busy with a project called DATV-Express which is

Lawrance, I can let you have some suitable relays FOC, if you are QTHR Best regards, Tim Hague, M0AFJ Skype m0afj.Tim Sent on my iPad

Andy wrote Is it that people are doing stuff?.... .....No. I think it's case of "Nah..... There's an App for that...... Someone else can do that hard stuff and I'll just pay them and use

Hi Charles Thanks for the reply. I would have thought there would be more comment on this subject but yours is the only one. I have looked at the Myriadrf and it looks interesting I will do

Yes, what has happened to design and build in in the rad Am community even over the last 13 years? I was recently perusing the Jan and Feb 2000 issues of RadCom and they were full of interesting

Dave, my mind's going.... it's only Monday isn't it....... I blame the heat, but same question for tomorrow? :-)

Anyone going to be QRV on 10GHz this evening or should I swap the shack for the garden with a cool beer instead? 73 John

Hi Keith, I rather like the Myriad RF board http://myriadrf.org/ which is basically the RF part only. Unfortunately the bridge board that connects it to the FPGA development board I use is currently

If anyone else is wondering - send the logs to me by email! 73 John G3XDY

How does one enter an online log for this contest when you've used the Rover rule and operated from two separate locations? The contest robot allows only one site to be entered. Do you put into two

Hey, I like that site ! And it also explains why my GPS/NMEA display keeps toggling between IO90IV58 and IO90IV48 (I don't display any higher resolution). That site shows me at IO90IV48XL so

Web site should have read http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/ I used this for yesterdays 134/ 76 /47 GHz contacts Roger

Andy, Why not use 10 digits locators? It is very easy to get an exact location using no.nonsense/qthmap/ I am sure you could argue about the uncertainty of the distances, but it look pretty good to

If 8 digit locators were used to define location, that would yield 7 points of jitter / uncertainty. Scoring at 1pt / 100m would mandate paths being calculated using accurate lat/long. Perhaps

I am very pleased to see that there was activity on several of our mm wave bands yesterday, and that some new paths were proved out successfully. In some cases the distances covered at these

Yesterday saw the 24G and up activity and two new paths at least were worked in the south by G8KQW and G8ACE. Of particular interest I think was Butser to Povington on 76GHz which although is not a UK

I also sent mine last night... Gary (M1EGI)