|
Live webcast from AMSAT-UK Space Colloquium
Live web streaming this weekend from AMSAT-UK International Space Colloquium.
Already covered 2.4 GHz ISS DATV transmitter and 2.4 GHz to 10 GHz linear transponder for Geostationary
Live web streaming this weekend from AMSAT-UK International Space Colloquium.
Already covered 2.4 GHz ISS DATV transmitter and 2.4 GHz to 10 GHz linear transponder for Geostationary
|
By
M5AKA
·
#33306
·
|
|
Re: 24GHz, 47GHz, and 76-248GHz Contests next weekend, 21st July
Apologies for re-send - but Yahoo seems to be delaying this topical msg when earlier mailings are included. So I've cut them right down, back to John's original...
Hi Peter,
Apologies for re-send - but Yahoo seems to be delaying this topical msg when earlier mailings are included. So I've cut them right down, back to John's original...
Hi Peter,
|
By
Martyn G3UKV
·
#33303
·
|
|
Live webcast from AMSAT-UK Space Colloquium
Live web streaming this weekend from AMSAT-UK International Space Colloquium.
Already covered 2.4 GHz ISS DATV transmitter and 2.4 GHz to 10 GHz linear transponder for Geostationary
Live web streaming this weekend from AMSAT-UK International Space Colloquium.
Already covered 2.4 GHz ISS DATV transmitter and 2.4 GHz to 10 GHz linear transponder for Geostationary
|
By
M5AKA
·
#33302
·
|
|
Re: 24GHz, 47GHz, and 76-248GHz Contests next weekend, 21st July
Missed a bit off last e-mail for last part of Sunday:-
Missed a bit off last e-mail for last part of Sunday:-
|
By
Martyn G3UKV
·
#33305
·
|
|
Re: OFCOM - DRAFT RESPONSE FOR COMMENT
GA Murray
The RSGB Draft Response is EXCELLENT.
Without detracting from those who have already given guidance and offered their own suggestions in various places (forums, BATC,
GA Murray
The RSGB Draft Response is EXCELLENT.
Without detracting from those who have already given guidance and offered their own suggestions in various places (forums, BATC,
|
By
Martyn G3UKV
·
#33301
·
|
|
Re: 24GHz, 47GHz, and 76-248GHz Contests next weekend, 21st July
Hi Peter, Keith, Chris, Roger et al
Been studying potential paths re 24 GHz.
So....
Start at Brown Clee (IO82QL84), around 0930 (UTC). Path to JO01EP maybe ????(with lift!) +
Hi Peter, Keith, Chris, Roger et al
Been studying potential paths re 24 GHz.
So....
Start at Brown Clee (IO82QL84), around 0930 (UTC). Path to JO01EP maybe ????(with lift!) +
|
By
Martyn G3UKV
·
#33304
·
|
|
24G contest tomorrow
Sorry mmwavers but 3 days of g100rsgb with camb-hams has used up all my xyl points this week so I won't be active after all. Other things to do on Sunday.
73
John
Sorry mmwavers but 3 days of g100rsgb with camb-hams has used up all my xyl points this week so I won't be active after all. Other things to do on Sunday.
73
John
|
By
g4bao
·
#33300
·
|
|
Re: CCX 3cms
GB3CCX is back to full strength here now the temperature is lower. Graham G3VKV
GB3CCX is back to full strength here now the temperature is lower. Graham G3VKV
|
By
Graham G3VKV
·
#33299
·
|
|
Blade RF
Hi Group
I keep looking at the RF bade unit at http://www.nuand.com/blog/shop/ Out of the box the bladeRF can tune from 300MHz to 3.8GHz without the need for extra boards and has current open
Hi Group
I keep looking at the RF bade unit at http://www.nuand.com/blog/shop/ Out of the box the bladeRF can tune from 300MHz to 3.8GHz without the need for extra boards and has current open
|
By
Keith Le Boutillier <keithl@...>
·
#33298
·
|
|
Re: G100RSGB -underwhelmed with uWave QSOS
I took a listen yesterday when it was reported that GB100RSGB was on 1296.210MHz, but didn't hear anything.
10GHz is not operational here at the moment but I might rig up a receive system for a cross
I took a listen yesterday when it was reported that GB100RSGB was on 1296.210MHz, but didn't hear anything.
10GHz is not operational here at the moment but I might rig up a receive system for a cross
|
By
G0DJA <dave@...>
·
#33297
·
|
|
Re: 1st 9H <--> IT9 24Ghz qso
Hi All Again,
In the excitement and given the time the e-mail was written, mistakenly I wrote johnny's call sign as IT9ARO which should have been IW9ARO. Sorry for the mistake.
The mistake has been
Hi All Again,
In the excitement and given the time the e-mail was written, mistakenly I wrote johnny's call sign as IT9ARO which should have been IW9ARO. Sorry for the mistake.
The mistake has been
|
By
Mansueto Grech <mansueto.grech@...>
·
#33296
·
|
|
Re: Agilent 346A and N9069A reading high?
Good points made by all and to mitigate against it I have used narrower bandwidths. I makes very little difference but it is still worth noting so thankyou for that. Basically the
Good points made by all and to mitigate against it I have used narrower bandwidths. I makes very little difference but it is still worth noting so thankyou for that. Basically the
|
By
Conrad Farlow <conrad@...>
·
#33295
·
|
|
1st 9H <--> IT9 24Ghz qso
Hi All,
Please to inform your that today July 19th 2013 the first ever QSO ON 24Ghz was made between 9H and IT9
At 17:21 GMT IT9ARO (Johnny) heard my (9H1GB) signal on 24.048200GHz+/- Immediately I
Hi All,
Please to inform your that today July 19th 2013 the first ever QSO ON 24Ghz was made between 9H and IT9
At 17:21 GMT IT9ARO (Johnny) heard my (9H1GB) signal on 24.048200GHz+/- Immediately I
|
By
Mansueto Grech <mansueto.grech@...>
·
#33294
·
|
|
Re: [Moon] [Moon-Net] Agilent 346A and N9069A reading high?
Glad you found it Conrad.
if its an ATF then it'll most likely be in the 5 to 6 GHz region.
(the narrow filter will not be helping it because the out of band matchwill be appalling from everywhere to
Glad you found it Conrad.
if its an ATF then it'll most likely be in the 5 to 6 GHz region.
(the narrow filter will not be helping it because the out of band matchwill be appalling from everywhere to
|
By
Graham D <graham.d@...>
·
#33293
·
|
|
Re: [Moon] [Moon-Net] Agilent 346A and N9069A reading high?
Ooops should have gone to Graham sorry.
__________________________________________________
73
Conrad G0RUZ IO93FR
North Wakefield Radio Club
__________________________________________________
Ooops should have gone to Graham sorry.
__________________________________________________
73
Conrad G0RUZ IO93FR
North Wakefield Radio Club
__________________________________________________
|
By
Conrad Farlow <conrad@...>
·
#33292
·
|
|
Re: [Moon] [Moon-Net] Agilent 346A and N9069A reading high?
Its hooting you were right. I removed the noise head and put a load on it and I can see a descrete frequency that has an 8dB noise figure. This will be the frequency at which it's oscillating.
Do you
Its hooting you were right. I removed the noise head and put a load on it and I can see a descrete frequency that has an 8dB noise figure. This will be the frequency at which it's oscillating.
Do you
|
By
Conrad Farlow <conrad@...>
·
#33291
·
|
|
OFCOM - DRAFT RESPONSE FOR COMMENT
Thanks for all inputs so far
THE RSGB DRAFT REPOSNSE IS NOW ONLINE
Web page:
http://rsgb.org/main/operating/band-plans/microwaves/spectrum-release/
Short
Thanks for all inputs so far
THE RSGB DRAFT REPOSNSE IS NOW ONLINE
Web page:
http://rsgb.org/main/operating/band-plans/microwaves/spectrum-release/
Short
|
By
g6jyb <mjniman@...>
·
#33290
·
|
|
Re: G100RSGB -underwhelmed with uWave QSOS
Sorry John taken the transverter and antenna off the mast so I could paint my shack whilst the weather was good.
73
Bob
G8DTF
Sorry John taken the transverter and antenna off the mast so I could paint my shack whilst the weather was good.
73
Bob
G8DTF
|
By
Robert Price <g8dtf@...>
·
#33289
·
|
|
Re: G100RSGB -underwhelmed with uWave QSOS
Hello John,
I have had virtually no conditions on any band 2mand up for past two days.
If your on after 7 or 8 in the evening I willgladly try but the bands are
as flat as a pancake here during
Hello John,
I have had virtually no conditions on any band 2mand up for past two days.
If your on after 7 or 8 in the evening I willgladly try but the bands are
as flat as a pancake here during
|
By
Ralph
·
#33288
·
|
|
Re: Ofcom deadline approaching (next Monday July 22nd)
Hi Murray and others.
Folowing the useful discussion session atFinningley, I have just submitted my response online.
73, Mike, G3LYP
Hi Murray and others.
Folowing the useful discussion session atFinningley, I have just submitted my response online.
73, Mike, G3LYP
|
By
Michael Scott
·
#33287
·
|