|
Re: QO-100
When it gets very narrow you get pictures like this - it doesn't say at what frequency other than
When it gets very narrow you get pictures like this - it doesn't say at what frequency other than
|
By
Dave G8KHU
·
#62817
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
Thanks Kent,
Can you do a Return Loss plot to determine if the feed impedance is 50 ohms?
I can readily get the gap to between 1 to 2 mm witch surely is close enough for the 4GHz
or so maximum
Thanks Kent,
Can you do a Return Loss plot to determine if the feed impedance is 50 ohms?
I can readily get the gap to between 1 to 2 mm witch surely is close enough for the 4GHz
or so maximum
|
By
Alan Beard
·
#62816
·
|
|
Wanted: 10GHz SMA Isolators
Hello All,
I'm looking for a couple of small 10GHz ferrite isolators for a new WG input LNA I'm working-on to replace my 2011 design. Does anyone have any they'd be prepared to sell me at a sensible
Hello All,
I'm looking for a couple of small 10GHz ferrite isolators for a new WG input LNA I'm working-on to replace my 2011 design. Does anyone have any they'd be prepared to sell me at a sensible
|
By
Chris Bartram G4DGU <chris@...>
·
#62815
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
I have perhaps a dozen Ridged horns of different sub-species.
Most have a ridge several millimeters wide.
But my 1-18 GHz one has the ridge ground to a fine edge along the top.
I think the fine edge
I have perhaps a dozen Ridged horns of different sub-species.
Most have a ridge several millimeters wide.
But my 1-18 GHz one has the ridge ground to a fine edge along the top.
I think the fine edge
|
By
KENT BRITAIN
·
#62814
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
Hi all,
Thanks guys for the pictures of commercial wide band horns but...
Can somebody answer the question please?
The ridge thickness, can it be thin, one sheet of sheet metal, say 1mm ?
(Just
Hi all,
Thanks guys for the pictures of commercial wide band horns but...
Can somebody answer the question please?
The ridge thickness, can it be thin, one sheet of sheet metal, say 1mm ?
(Just
|
By
Alan Beard
·
#62813
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
Not sure I do either - in the traditional 2.D²/λ sense
But when the transmitter is not a point source (not diffraction limited, I think, in optical terms) there must be some name for it.
The
Not sure I do either - in the traditional 2.D²/λ sense
But when the transmitter is not a point source (not diffraction limited, I think, in optical terms) there must be some name for it.
The
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62812
·
|
|
Re: dish positioning?
Hi Ben
That's what I use with simple switch to reverse polarity 12vdc set your the centre to 0deg then
You have equal throw either side , it was suggested to me by G8DMU and it works very well
Cheers
Hi Ben
That's what I use with simple switch to reverse polarity 12vdc set your the centre to 0deg then
You have equal throw either side , it was suggested to me by G8DMU and it works very well
Cheers
|
By
steve G1PPA
·
#62811
·
|
|
Re: dish positioning?
Thinking on what someone said I was trying to figure out how to nod the dish up and down to get the best signal. In my case it needs to be very light as its manually raised. I was trying to think
Thinking on what someone said I was trying to figure out how to nod the dish up and down to get the best signal. In my case it needs to be very light as its manually raised. I was trying to think
|
By
militaryoperator
·
#62810
·
|
|
dish positioning?
Thinking on what someone said I was trying to figure out how to nod the dish up and down to get the best signal. In my case it needs to be very light as its manually raised. I was trying to think
Thinking on what someone said I was trying to figure out how to nod the dish up and down to get the best signal. In my case it needs to be very light as its manually raised. I was trying to think
|
By
militaryoperator
·
#62809
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
<< ...in the sun's near field. >>
Not sure I completely agree with that Andy.
If the sun is a single source driving a sun diameter antenna, then yes indeed.
If you consider the sun to be an enormous
<< ...in the sun's near field. >>
Not sure I completely agree with that Andy.
If the sun is a single source driving a sun diameter antenna, then yes indeed.
If you consider the sun to be an enormous
|
By
Dave G8KHU
·
#62808
·
|
|
Re: UK Microwave OPs - Digest #264
Yes please, Chris
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
Yes please, Chris
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62807
·
|
|
Re: UK Microwave OPs - Digest #264
Andy,
If it's the same as the one I have, and it looks suspiciously like it, I have the manufacturer's data sheet on that horn ...
Let me know if you'd like it.
Chris
G4DGU
Andy,
If it's the same as the one I have, and it looks suspiciously like it, I have the manufacturer's data sheet on that horn ...
Let me know if you'd like it.
Chris
G4DGU
|
By
Chris Bartram G4DGU <chris@...>
·
#62806
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
An instinctive feeling is nagging me that the fraction of the sun in the antenna beamwidth doesn't matter when working things out this way. But it's hard to quantify why, except that using a solar
An instinctive feeling is nagging me that the fraction of the sun in the antenna beamwidth doesn't matter when working things out this way. But it's hard to quantify why, except that using a solar
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62805
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
Worked out the equation from first principles now, and it gives the same as Mike's example
k is Boltzman's constant, 1.38E-23
and S in the equation is the actual solar flux in Watts per m^2/Hz, not
Worked out the equation from first principles now, and it gives the same as Mike's example
k is Boltzman's constant, 1.38E-23
and S in the equation is the actual solar flux in Watts per m^2/Hz, not
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62804
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
I'm also puzzled as to how that can work with arbitrary antenna beamwidth
If the beamwidth is much larger than the sun's disc diameter then only a portion of the solar flux is contributimg, A very
I'm also puzzled as to how that can work with arbitrary antenna beamwidth
If the beamwidth is much larger than the sun's disc diameter then only a portion of the solar flux is contributimg, A very
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62803
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
Looks a bit like that, but it's smaller
Mouth dimensions (internal) 104 x 69mm
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
Looks a bit like that, but it's smaller
Mouth dimensions (internal) 104 x 69mm
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62802
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
To which I add I have a number of the 1.5 -15GHz ones in stock.
Sam, G4DDK
To which I add I have a number of the 1.5 -15GHz ones in stock.
Sam, G4DDK
|
By
SAM JEWELL
·
#62801
·
|
|
Re: A quick lashup 2.3 to 3.4 GHz horn
Looks like a 1-18GHz horn similar to the ETS Lindgren / Emco 3115.
Best Regards
Tim Hague
Looks like a 1-18GHz horn similar to the ETS Lindgren / Emco 3115.
Best Regards
Tim Hague
|
By
Tim Hague M0AFJ <m0afj@...>
·
#62800
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
I can't make that G/T equation work with your values.
What is k ?
And I assume it should read
G/T = 10 * log [ 4 π k (10^(N/10) - 1) / ( λ^2 S) ] . dB/K
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
I can't make that G/T equation work with your values.
What is k ?
And I assume it should read
G/T = 10 * log [ 4 π k (10^(N/10) - 1) / ( λ^2 S) ] . dB/K
Andy
www.g4jnt.com
|
By
Andy G4JNT
·
#62799
·
|
|
Re: QO-100
Forgot to add, if the transmitted noise power is roughly the same as the solar flux that gives a handle on the gain of the transponder once you do the link budget taking into account the distance, the
Forgot to add, if the transmitted noise power is roughly the same as the solar flux that gives a handle on the gain of the transponder once you do the link budget taking into account the distance, the
|
By
Mike Willis
·
#62798
·
|