Hello Mike I agree with the rule of thumb! Careful simulation does provide a way of minimising inter-antenna degradation, though. To put things in perspective, my 2/70/23 system occupied about 3.5m

I think there is a rule of thumb - which is don't. Unless of course you have to and then as far apart as possible. I did manage to stack antennas for 6m up to 13cm in about 6ft of vertical space but

Hi All, Just to let you know, I have taken GB3CSB off the air today. This is to add 13cm and 9cm, along with a new PA for 23cm. Some preparation will also be made in anticipation of some other bands

try emailing Kent at: wa5vjb@...

Hi David... I've just checked and it works for me provided I type it into the box on the browser. However if you copy and paste from the Scatterpoint pdf file it apparently puts a space after group/

Hello Dom I don't see Scatterpoint at the moment, and unfortunately I wasn't able to get to Martlesham, but I looked fairly thoroughly into the problems of stacking my own antennas for 2/70/23 a

Hello ---------------------------------------snip------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It works here, David. G4HJW David Jones wrote:

I've tried to get into the Scatterpoint Yahoo site, but Yahoo says Scatterpoint does not exist. Can somebody post me a url please? The one from the latest scatterpoint does not work. Thank

Many thanks for the info David. Mike

In fact the moon must be much more reliable and predictable than the F layers ... no problem with "moonspots" affecting propagation :-) Peter

Well I once worked VP8GQ in Antarctica on 160 metres with 7 watts out to a 270 ft end fed wire bent five times around my parent's garden and no higher than 40 feet at the best... on CW of course :-) I

To all paid up members of the UK Microwave Group.. The latest edition of our newsletter Scatterpoint has been just emailed to those on the email lists and also uploaded to the Scatterpoint Yahoo

On 08/12/2010 19:11, g0mrf@... wrote: Hi guys, I suggest 220g/l ammonium peroxydisulphate ... (NH4)2S2O8 ... @ 40-50C as the preferred etchant. Much cleaner than ferric chloride and you

There is a good group on making you ownPCBs. See, http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/ Derward Myrick KD5WWI

In a message dated 08/12/2010 10:08:51 GMT Standard Time,g3lyp@... writes: Hello Mike. Sorry the message was lost. I did a reply for Andy giving the proportions as best I can remember, butthe H2O2

Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@...> wrote: I would not recommend that method of tinning if you have to place a legless type SM device , QFP, as you can't get a even thickness and the IC will not sit

There seem to be several detractors of the press-n-peel transfer technique. The two photographs linked here are examples of what can be done with "press-n-peel blue" when small compact PCBs are

HCl very easily. Most hardware stores sell it as a drain cleaner / limescale remover. I was surprised, but have seen it in many places. And in the nearly fully concenrated fuming variety. Look for

Hi Andy Yes, worth trying but can ordinary people get HCl and H2O2 easily? David From: Andy Talbot To: ukmicrowaves@... Sent: Wednesday, 8 December, 2010 11:33:32 Subject: Re: [ukmicrowaves] Re: