Re: 10Ghz preamp?
militaryoperator
HI Ben,
Its time for you to meet Franco's SU-02 board as it will do you well on 3cms (and other bands)
You need a sharp knife and some soldering abilities
page 60
cheers
Geoff
GI0GDP
Have to buy my milling machine first to make that milled box I guess. hi.
Ben
|
|
Re: 10Ghz preamp?
geoffrey pike
HI Ben, Its time for you to meet Franco's SU-02 board as it will do you well on 3cms (and other bands) You need a sharp knife and some soldering abilities page 60 cheers Geoff GI0GDP
On Tuesday, 13 July 2021, 22:24:34 BST, militaryoperator via groups.io <military1944@...> wrote:
Anyone making preamps for 10Ghz. I have one, an HEMT type which does work but before I shoehorn it into my 10Ghz box I was just wondering if there's better out there, built of course. No facilities for making pcb's etc.
Ben
|
|
Re: PLL Question
M0ZHN
Thanks Andy, will give that a try and see how it goes.
Elia, M0ZHN
|
|
Re: PLL Question
Looks back though archives ... Brian being GM8BJF Yes, use an OPAMP gain stage. I use the LM6211 which is a 20MHz bandwidth chip that can operate up to 24V, and have used it with LMX2470 and LMX2487 synth chips to drive VCOs that take a tuning voltage greater than 5V. Rather than a buffer / gain stage though, the complete loop filter is built around the LM6211 which end up as an inverting stage so the appropriate config bit in the synth chip to ser negative phase detector polarity needs to be set. http://g4jnt.com/LMX2470_DevModule.pdf gives more details. Andy
Hi Andy,
|
|
Re: PLL Question
M0ZHN
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your reply, it was in RadCom Plus Volume 1, No.1 but it is also on Brian's website: Versatile PLL Elia, M0ZHN
|
|
Re: PLL Question
Can you refer the RadCom article - like which issue? I suspect you could use a non-inverting op-amp stage with a gain of 4 running from a 25V rail to get the swing you need. May need a fast opamp - There are suitable ones around Andy
Hi everyone,
|
|
10Ghz preamp?
militaryoperator
Anyone making preamps for 10Ghz. I have one, an HEMT type which does work but before I shoehorn it into my 10Ghz box I was just wondering if there's better out there, built of course. No facilities for making pcb's etc.
Ben
|
|
PLL Question
M0ZHN
Hi everyone,
I am new here, just joined today. I would like to ask a question if I may. I am looking to build the versatile PLL that was published by Brian in RadCom Plus some time back. The circuit seems to require a VCO that is designed for 0-5V tuning. Is there a way I can use a wideband VCO, say 0-20V tuning, with this circuit and if so what do I need to add/change/modify? Any advice and help is greatly appreciated. 73 Elia, M0ZHN
|
|
Re: ADF4351 Controller
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 20:41, Tim, VK2XAX <VK2XAX@...> wrote: Hi Andy,
|
|
Re: ADF4351 Controller
Hi Andy,
Will you be offering PCB's or is making those up to the reader ? If the later, can you share the gerbers so I can knock up a few down under ? thanks Tim -- VK2XAX : QF56if : ITU59 : CQ30 : BMARC : WIA
|
|
Re: GB3GCT
Alan Melia
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Tony this is/was a problem with BT but it is easily
solved (well certinly in my case)
You may already have done this.....but maybe some
missed previous descriptions I still see some bounced mails on the list I run
but these are generally because the receiving ISP has tagged the mail
incorrectly as spam.
Go to web-mail click on your address and click
settings on the drop-down menu
select Mail on the LHS menu
then you will see a menu allowing you to block
senders or domains
(make sure you did not block anything you
want)
Then go to the lower item and set groups.io as a
''safe sender''
Without this it seems BT appliesa very aggressive
heuristic decision on all incomming mails.
After doing this I got most mails through though
some did land in thespam folder until they were approved.
Since doing this I have not been bouncing any list
server mail distribution including time-nuts (febo) and mailman or other bulk
senders
I have been receiving groups.io mail for
severalyears not and I cant remember any nasties thathave crept though on any
group (unlike Yahoo!)
Alan
G3NYK
|
|
Re: GB3GCT
Tony G4NBS
In defence of John I had to switch to digest to avoid those continuous bounced message errors from groups.io.
I was continually having to unlock my account due to this group, others did not appear to be so problematic for some reason. Since switching to the digest I have not been locked out for something like 2 years..... Regards Tony G4NBS
|
|
Re: Locate Prog
In those early versions there was an approximate conversion for NGR <> Lat/Long doing the rounds that was good for 100m or so accuracy. It must have been an empirically designed formula as it had a very weird function in there - something like LOG(SIN) or LOG(TAN) IIRC. I could never work out where that came from but it did, sort of work. Soon replaced it with the OS polynomial that was good for metre accuracy. And only recently added the WGS84/GBR36 spheroid conversion for the Windoze versions - that's messy, and it's only good for 3metre accuracy without complicated correction tables. And to think, back in those days it was difficult enough to get people to use 8 char Locators for 400m resolution. Now we routinely quote 10 char and even 12 char ones. Andy
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 15:01, Colin G4EML <colin@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Locate Prog
Colin G4EML
Hi Andy, Yes the very earliest version used just NGRs. But I soon updated it to use the lat long great circle calcs. That’s why it took so long to calculate, the basic language used was not fast with trig functions. Colin.
On 13 Jul 2021, at 12:22, Andy G4JNT <andy.g4jnt@...> wrote:
Was that a prog that calculated bearings using Pythagorus on NGRs? The error doing that is quite considerable on paths more than a few tens of km, but back in those days on wide band FM was presumably acceptable. I started off that way, but as soon as the NGR to Lat/Long routines appeared - the simple one before GPS forced us all to adopt lat/long in WGS84 - it was changed to a great circle calculation. Andy On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 10:17, Colin G4EML <colin@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: GB3GCT
Actually, the RadCpm deadline is 15 July, so you've still time to send an updated copy. That's what happened with DN last month - the 'stop-press' bit at the end re. the attenuator. Andy
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 14:38, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: GB3GCT
> As I only take the digest Perhaps there's a moral there somewhere, John. ;-) People didn't send these reports in "for the column", they were sent for Group interest Andy
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 14:29, g4bao <john@...> wrote: Blast! I just submitted the column without these details!
|
|
Re: GB3GCT
g4bao
Blast! I just submitted the column without these details!
As I only take the digest, can you in future send stuff for the column direct to me. Ta John
|
|
Re: Locate Prog
Was that a prog that calculated bearings using Pythagorus on NGRs? The error doing that is quite considerable on paths more than a few tens of km, but back in those days on wide band FM was presumably acceptable. I started off that way, but as soon as the NGR to Lat/Long routines appeared - the simple one before GPS forced us all to adopt lat/long in WGS84 - it was changed to a great circle calculation. Andy
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 10:17, Colin G4EML <colin@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: ADF4351 Controller
Nice chip, that one. Andy
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:09, Colin Ranson <g8lbs@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: ADF4351 Controller
Colin Ranson
Andy,
I have just looked at the ‘black board’ I have under a good head viewer and the chip is an ADF5355 which goes to 13.5GHz. A completely different kettle of fish to the ADF4351. I think I got it to make a sig genny, but have now got an alternative.
I’ll find something to make it go at a fixed 5328 or 5330MHz, having said that digital stuff is not my forte.
73’s
de G8LBS – presently putting together a 30w 3400MHz amp.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Andy G4JNT
Sent: 13 July 2021 10:54 To: UK Microwaves groups.io Subject: Re: [UKMicrowaves] ADF4351 Controller
OK I've modded the PIC code, as of yesterday, for 32 spot frequencies with five control links. Now it's going to be a case of generating the data for 32 frequencies and assembling into the file before placing the code for public consumption.
There's also the issue of what reference to choose. 10MHz, obvs. But how worth it would it be to include a few frequencies for a 25MHz reference - the one often supplied on the Chinese boards? With 32 settings to choose from, there's space for a small subset of 25MHz ones.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 10:47, Colin Ranson <g8lbs@...> wrote:
|
|