But one purification cycle gives the raw materials for tens of thousands of chips. May even be 100s of k devices - does anyone have figures?
So it's hardly a 'lot' of energy.
When the design already exists and the IP is made available, they're pretty easy to get made too. Look at the story of the reincarnation of the old SL6270 VOGAD chip.
And this myth about static sensitivity.
OK, back in the dark ages of the 1970s, perhaps into the 1980s even, devices were susceptible and manufacturers weren't as careful as they should have been, but since then they've become orders of magnitude better. It's not just hearsay, I know someone who has worked in the highly specialised field of semiconductor static testing since that era and he has benn very closely involved with and explained the progress made over the years with testing techniques and built in protection.. (He may even be a member of this Group now. Paul, are you there ....?)
It's really about time some of these myths of decades ago were forgotten and people looked at the real state of electronics today. Trouble is, there are so few young electronics graduates in our Am. Rad. ranks now to tell the story ...
BTW, I connected a chunky 5V power supply the wrong way round to a PIC processor once. It current limited at 3A and current must have passed for perhaps half a second, most of i- going through the device WHICH SURVIVED to carry on working. What happened is that every I/O line and there were over 20 of them had reverse biassed diodes (for transient and over voltage protection) to ground and the supply rail. With the supply reversed all these diodes forward conducted, in parallel, and were able to able to sink that 3A for the duration. But longer and bond wires might have popped. But the chip subsequently worked.
What's this got to do with the subject line of RF Indication - I dunno, but it's a good waffle anyway. Back to the G+T