Date
21 - 40 of 55
P6137 scope probe repair
Tom Lee
Hi Jared,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
It's great that you confirmed the diagnosis given by the capacitance measurements. It's also great that you have the option of returning it (I missed that part; I would've advised doing just that -- oh well!). If you didn't have that option, I'd have proceeded to torture you with more suggestions to fix it, but that's not necessary now. -- Cheers, Tom -- Prof. Thomas H. Lee Allen Ctr., Rm. 205 350 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4070 http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
On 1/17/2021 15:41, Jared Cabot via groups.io wrote:
Well inamongst all the shouting, I found the problem.
|
|
John Gord
Tom,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Few of the probe instruction manuals I can still find have schematics. I opened up an early P6106 compensation box, and it has two unshielded inductors (ferrite rod cores?) placed close enough together that they might couple a little. Intentional? --John Gord
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 03:08 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
|
|
John Gord
Tom,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
How about I mail it to you? I assume the address after your signature will work. --John
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 03:19 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
|
|
Yeah, I could have a go at somehow uncrimping it (I have many crimpers, I'm sure one would fit well enough to crimp it back down again), but weighing up between potentially butchering it and just returning it to have another go at a cheap probe in the future, the decision fell in favour of living to see another day and another probe. :D
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Well, unless there is some surefire way to uncrimp the connection? The actual termination of the cable looks very straightforward. Jared.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:56 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
|
|
Roy Thistle
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 03:41 PM, Jared Cabot wrote:
Others reading this might be interested. I have, and have had HF probes... and many times the trouble is with the cable. HF probes are in my experience... somewhat delicate... and don't like to be rough handled... relative to the some of older, and lower frequency probes that came with some of the 400, and 7000 series scopes. Those probes seem to be able to take reasonable abuse. If you don't need the bandwidth... or are buying one just as a hedge... I opine it is better, and usually a lot cheaper, to get the older ones, as above. They seem to last a lot better. I reckon that problems with HF probes are both because of necessity of the way the cable is constructed, and the reduction in quality that has occurred.
|
|
Tom Lee
Hi Jared,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Given a choice between trying to fix it, and returning it to the seller, I'd vote "return to seller" overwhelmingly. If the choice were between trying to fix it and junking it, I'd try to fix it. Here, get your money back. -- Cheers, Tom -- Prof. Thomas H. Lee Allen Ctr., Rm. 205 350 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4070 http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
On 1/17/2021 16:47, Jared Cabot via groups.io wrote:
Yeah, I could have a go at somehow uncrimping it (I have many crimpers, I'm sure one would fit well enough to crimp it back down again), but weighing up between potentially butchering it and just returning it to have another go at a cheap probe in the future, the decision fell in favour of living to see another day and another probe. :D
|
|
Yeah, it pains me to see how these probes are so tightly coiled in the photos on various auction websites... I wonder how many have been inadvertently damaged just by the sellers ignorance as to proper handling of these things..
I'm slowly searching for good deals on these probes for my 2467B, it's a 4 channel but I only really need two probes, and I can wait for a good deal to pop up. My trusty TDS210 gets me by with most stuff for now. :D Jared On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:10 AM, Roy Thistle wrote:
I think I'll do exactly this. I'm not so desperate to get this probe fixed that I can't wait for another one to come along. :) On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
|
|
Leon Robinson
Jared
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
What about a short piece of brass tubing slipped over the crimp area and crimp the center conductor in it. Leon Robinson K5JLR Political Correctness is a Political Disease. Politicians and Diapers should be changed often and for the same reasons.
On Sunday, January 17, 2021, 5:41:55 PM CST, Jared Cabot via groups.io <jaredcabot=protonmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Well inamongst all the shouting, I found the problem. It seems the cable was pulled and the center conductor has retracted into the inner insulation, pulling away from the end-cap at the scope end. Unfortunately I have no way to satisfactorily uncrimp and them recrimp the end connector to enable me to cut half an inch off the end of the cable to reterminate it, so I'll be returning it to the seller as faulty for a refund. Thanks all for the info and help! :)
|
|
Ok, so repair is back on the table.
The seller gave me a full refund and told me to keep the probe. :) I was thinking about how to uncrimp the connection, I think if I cut the cable flush, then dig out the remaining cable inside the crimp, I might be able to carefully form the crimped portion back to enough of a round shape to re-use. Then I can reinsert the cable and recrimp. I think I should only lose half an inch to an inch of cable so performance should remain in the 'good enough' region. Now I have the probe for free, I have nothing to lose so lets see how badly I mess it up. At least I'll have the spare parts from each end of the probe if the cable proves to be unrepairable....
|
|
Tom Lee
Cool, Jared! Document with pics as you go. I'm sure that you'll learn a great deal and will have good advice for the next person to attempt a probe repair.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
And if you ever get a chance, I personally would like to see what the internals of the compensation box looks like, to compare with the innards of the 6131. I'm guessing that they would be quite similar, but it would be nice to know the real answer. --Cheers, Tom -- Prof. Thomas H. Lee Allen Ctr., Rm. 205 350 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4070 http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
On 1/18/2021 00:45, Jared Cabot via groups.io wrote:
Ok, so repair is back on the table.
|
|
WINNER, WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!
It's ALIVE! :D So I managed to dig out the cable from the connector after I cut it off the cable flush with the connector. The end cap and second ring (and insulator) just gently pull away with the careful use of some sharp side cutters to act as if you were pulling them off with your fingernails. Then I used a 2mm drill bit to drill the core out and then pulled the outer insulation out too. After that, some small pointy pliers were used to round out the crimped portion and gently knocked in a 4mm drill bit backwards to act as a drift to round it out to as much as possible. Using the piece of outer insulation pulled out from the connector, you can estimate how much to push back in, it's about 17mm or so. Then it was pretty much just a matter of cutting back the cable by about an inch and then terminating the cable in a similar manner to any other coax. (I trimmed some of the shield braid off to make insertion easier). Now, I got me a working scope probe! All I need to do now is find a crimper that will crimp a hex shape about 4.2 - 4.4mm across flats and it's pretty much finished. I am one happy boy. :D So, now I'm off to ebay to try my luck with some other cheap probes I think. D Here are some photos I took, a video will be up on Youtube soon too so I'll link it here when it's online, or you can keep an eye on my channel, NearFarMedia. Innards of the Circuit Board Assembly: https://i.imgur.com/wxCDifj.jpg The cable connector disassembled: https://i.imgur.com/xeiT8e0.jpg The working probe!: https://i.imgur.com/kROO6jp.jpg
|
|
Milan Trcka
Jared,
I share your pain. I had an almost the same problem with a similar (if not identical) probe. Went through a fair amount of discovery. The center conductor appears to be non-solderable using standard fluxes (rosin and acid). I suspect it may be inconel or similar alloy. To uncrimp: Dremel tool and fine abrasive wheel and very careful cutting will liberate the cable and the center conductor. Alternately just chop off the cable end past the break, usually within a couple of inches of the exit from the strain relief on either end (as proven). To crimp (much more difficult): Thin-wall brass tubing for the outer jacket (alternately it appears that an insert for 1/4" plastic tubing used for compression fitting might work); crimp with a hex die in a coax cable crimper - some tools have up to three different diameters. For the inner conductor I used a stainless steel tube from a hypodermic needle (brass tubing would be better - did not find any). Crimp on the wire and solder to the SS tube (needs special flux). Crimp can be made with an adjustable 4-jaw pin crimper such as Cannon or Bendix - type. In any case this is a laborious process needing not-quite-common materials and special tools. If available, great. If not, it may not be worth the effort to locate/obtain them. Sincerely hope this may provoke a more constructive discussion. Milan
|
|
Tom Lee
Fantastic, Jared -- well done! I'm happy that the capacitance method pinpointed the location of the break to that level of precision, and that you devised a repair method that doesn't totally maul the cable.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
A virtual merit badge inducting you into the /Order of the Witches' Hat/ to you! -- Cheers Tom -- Prof. Thomas H. Lee Allen Ctr., Rm. 205 350 Jane Stanford Way Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-4070 http://www-smirc.stanford.edu
On 1/18/2021 07:12, Jared Cabot via groups.io wrote:
WINNER, WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!
|
|
Lawrance A. Schneider
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:33 PM, Jared Cabot wrote:
Hello Mr. Cabot, I left teaching to work in the Postal Service; reason being I took a huge pay raise by doing so. I made more than the Chairmen of the Mathematics Dept. . Go figure! In any event, the Postal service has their own school in Norman OK. I hated it there; every time they sent me there, I would great people with "Home, ET go home." and point towards the north-east sky. The instructors there had a huge problem with ET's wrapping the test leads around the meters we use there and - well you outlined 'what' in your missive; it "pains" me too. I never 'wrapped' my leads preferring to let them 'dangle' whenever I needed to do some trouble shooting on a faulty machine. Were I to have a bad test lead, I would naturally just fix it. However, many 'bosses' of the maintenance department knew nothing about how we worked. So, my fellow ETs form other areas would request a new set of leads rather than fix what they broke by tightly wrapping. The instructors there got tired of fixing broken meter cables. If you can indeed send it back, do so. Otherwise, it might be a fun project to 'try' to do the repairs. Thanks, larry
|
|
Lawrance A. Schneider
Great fix. I hope you put your pictures in the group photo area.
larry
|
|
Jeff Woolsey
On 1/18/21 10:20 AM, Milan Trcka wrote:
Jared, I, too, have a problem with P6137 probes. I have three of them: one is fine, one has a broken/lost probe tip, and the third also has a broken tip but it's stuck in the witches' hat. This means that the probe works fine with the hat, but is unusable without it... Someday when I've saved up enough pennies, two new probe tips for me. -- Jeff Woolsey {{woolsey,jlw}@jlw,first.last@{gmail,jlw}}.com Nature abhors straight antennas, clean lenses, and empty storage. "Delete! Delete! OK!" -Dr. Bronner on disk space management Card-sorting, Joel. -Crow on solitaire
|
|
I just uploaded a video showing the repair process, link below:
https://youtu.be/xSJzuXy4pgA I've also put the images from my previous post into the photos section here too: https://groups.io/g/TekScopes/album?id=259576
|
|
Jacques DULONGPONT
Very intersting video. Most probably the solution for one of my defective
probe. Thanks Jacques Le mar. 19 janv. 2021 à 16:05, Jared Cabot via groups.io <jaredcabot= protonmail.com@groups.io> a écrit : I just uploaded a video showing the repair process, link below:
|
|
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:04 PM, Jared Cabot wrote:
Nice Job, Jared! Raymond
|
|
Dave Daniel
BTW, that spring-loaded pin on the BNC connector end is not a ground pin. It indicates to the scope that the probe is a 10x probe so that the scope can display the proper voltage values. Remove the pin and the scope will treat the input as a 1x probe, even though the displayed waveform will be correct for a 10x probe.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
DaveD
On Jan 19, 2021, at 10:39, Jacques DULONGPONT <ankorjd@gmail.com> wrote:
|
|