Date
1 - 9 of 9
454 with no vert. deflection
mtmpsmp@...
I have a 454 that has no vertical deflection on ch1 or ch2, using
another scope I am able to trace signal from the preamps to the deflection plates. The sweep appears to be in good shape and the trace is centered on crt. ( position controls have no effect on trace) What I don't understand is that I have a voltage imbalance on vertical plates and the trace is still centered!
|
|
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
mtmpsmp@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a 454 that has no vertical deflection on ch1 or ch2, usingBoy! I don't understand that either. I have to wonder if the voltage unbalance is actually getting to the deflection plates inside the CRT. Perhaps there is a broken connection INSIDE the CRT. If the unbalance is actually on the CRT plates, I don't see how the trace can be centered vertically . . . Stan w7ni@easystreet.com
|
|
mtmpsmp@...
--- In TekScopes@y..., Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@e...> wrote:
mtmpsmp@y... wrote:onI have a 454 that has no vertical deflection on ch1 or ch2, using voltagevertical plates and the trace is still centered!Boy! I don't understand that either. I have to wonder if the unbalance is actually getting to the deflection plates inside theCRT. Perhaps there is a broken connection INSIDE the CRT. If theunbalance is actually on the CRT plates, I don't see how the trace can becentered vertically . . ....................................................................... Stan, Upon further investigation I have found that when the scope is turned on the collector voltage is the same (74.6 volts) on each output device. The voltage will stay in that condition ( flat centered trace) until I start making voltage measurements with my voltmeter ( high impedance digital) then the top connecter drops to 56.8 -62.0 volts and the bottom to 32.5 -29.8 volts, the voltage of course being determined by position control. The trace is at this point off screen in all modes ( chop, add ect) I can seem only to bring this condition on by taking voltage measurement on either vert plate. Do you think maybe a bad output transistor? thanks for your help. Mike http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
mtmpsmp@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In TekScopes@y..., Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@e...> wrote:Maybe, Mike. Looking at my 454 manual, I see that the collector voltage onmtmpsmp@y... wrote:onI have a 454 that has no vertical deflection on ch1 or ch2, using both Q394 and Q494 should be about 41-42 volts measured with a voltmeter. Also, I don't think the voltmeter should "load" the circuit such that the voltage changes very much because of attaching the voltmeter. There are TWO sets of vertical deflection plate pins. Are you sure all FOUR pins are connected? A good troubleshooting method for balanced circuits like vertical amplifiers is to short together like points such as the upper and lower CRT deflection plates in order to force them to be at the same voltage. This should force the trace to be centered vertcially and should not damage the circuitry. If the trace is centered with the CRT vertical deflection plates shorted together (this is also the same as shorting the collectors of the vertical output stage transistors together), it is a very good indication that the CRT itself is good. Next, you can remove the short and move it to the emitters of Q394 and Q494. If the trace is once again centered vertically, most likely Q394 and Q494 are good. Next, move the short to the base of Q374 and the base of Q474. If the trace is once again centered, most likely Q374 and Q474 are good. You can work your way a stage at a time through the vertical amplifier this way until you do not get a centered trace. Now you are very close to the problem and it is time to check for shorted or open transistors in this immediate area. Be careful not to brush ground with the loose end of the short wire while the instrument is powered up and the other end is connected because you will have a LOT of destroyed transistors if you do that . . . Also, be sure BOTH ends of the short wire are disconnected before connecting one end to another part of the circuit . . . Let me know how this works for you. Stan w7ni@easystreet.com
|
|
mtmpsmp@...
--- In TekScopes@y..., Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@e...> wrote:
wrote: usingmtmpsmp@y... wrote:I have a 454 that has no vertical deflection on ch1 or ch2, theanother scope I am able to trace signal from the preamps to thedeflection plates. The sweep appears to be in good shape and ontrace is centered on crt. ( position controls have no effect imbalancetrace) What I don't understand is that I have a voltage theonvoltagevertical plates and the trace is still centered!Boy! I don't understand that either. I have to wonder if theunbalance is actually getting to the deflection plates inside ..CRT......................................................................Perhaps there is a broken connection INSIDE the CRT. If theunbalance isactually on the CRT plates, I don't see how the trace can becenteredvertically . . . toStan, of56.8 -62.0 volts and the bottom to 32.5 -29.8 volts, the voltage vertcourse being determined by position control. The trace is at this voltage onplate.Maybe, Mike. Looking at my 454 manual, I see that the collector both Q394 and Q494 should be about 41-42 volts measured with avoltmeter. Also, I don't think the voltmeter should "load" the circuit suchthat the voltage changes very much because of attaching the voltmeter.There are TWO sets of vertical deflection plate pins. Are you sure all FOUR pinsare connected?amplifiers is to short together like points such as the upper and lower CRTdeflection plates in order to force them to be at the same voltage. Thisshould force the trace to be centered vertcially and should not damage thecircuitry. If the trace is centered with the CRT vertical deflection platesshorted together (this is also the same as shorting the collectors of thevertical output stage transistors together), it is a very good indicationthat the CRT itself is good.and Q494. If the trace is once again centered vertically, most likely Q394and Q494 are good. Next, move the short to the base of Q374 and the base ofQ474. If the trace is once again centered, most likely Q374 and Q474 are good.You can work your way a stage at a time through the vertical amplifier thisway until you do not get a centered trace. Now you are very close to theproblem and it is time to check for shorted or open transistors in thisimmediate area. Be careful not to brush ground with the loose end of the short wirewhile the instrument is powered up and the other end is connected because youwill have a LOT of destroyed transistors if you do that . . . Also, be sureBOTH ends of the short wire are disconnected before connecting one end toanother part of the circuit . . .w7ni@e................................................................ ...................................................................... Stan, I got no farther than Q374 and Q474, I replaced both transistors and the output transistors collector voltage dropped to 40.5 and 35.2 volts. The trace is now in the upper half of screen and I have a small deflection of a square wave signal so gain is poor. Should Q374and Q474 be a matched duo? This thing about having to touch the collectors to start the transistors to conduct is really odd, you don't have to leave the probe on just make a momentary contact with deflection pin or collector. I don't have a manual for this thing so I'm working mostly in the dark. I would like to thank you very much for all the help you have given me. mike
|
|
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
Hi Mike,voltage onDo you think maybe a bad output transistor? thanks for your help.Maybe, Mike. Looking at my 454 manual, I see that the collector You really need a 454 manual. The one I was using to remind me of the Q numbers was the one I now have up for sale on eBay right now. You should look at auction #1226363944 and think about bidding on it. You probably have found at least one bad transistor, or maybe two. You can test those for most defects with an ohmmeter right on the bench. The next thing I would do is short the emitters of Q394 and Q494 and see if this forces the trace to the center of the screen. If it does, then I would say Q394 and Q494 are good and you need to progress with the shorting process to the previous stage, etc. You really need the manual . . . Stan w7ni@easystreet.com
|
|
mtmpsmp@...
--- In TekScopes@y..., Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@e...> wrote:
help.Do you think maybe a bad output transistor? thanks for your pinsvoltage onMikeMaybe, Mike. Looking at my 454 manual, I see that the collectorboth Q394 and Q494 should be about 41-42 volts measured with avoltmeter.Also, I don't think the voltmeter should "load" the circuit suchthat thevoltage changes very much because of attaching the voltmeter.There are TWOsets of vertical deflection plate pins. Are you sure all FOUR verticalareconnected? theamplifiersis to short together like points such as the upper and lower CRTdeflectionplates in order to force them to be at the same voltage. Thisshould forcethe trace to be centered vertcially and should not damage thecircuitry. Ifthe trace is centered with the CRT vertical deflection platesshortedtogether (this is also the same as shorting the collectors of Q394verticaloutput stage transistors together), it is a very good indicationthat the CRTitself is good. good.and Q494.If the trace is once again centered vertically, most likely Q394and Q494 aregood. Next, move the short to the base of Q374 and the base ofQ474. If thetrace is once again centered, most likely Q374 and Q474 are thisYou canwork your way a stage at a time through the vertical amplifier wireway untilyou do not get a centered trace. Now you are very close to theproblem andit is time to check for shorted or open transistors in thisimmediate area.Be careful not to brush ground with the loose end of the short youwhile theinstrument is powered up and the other end is connected because surewill havea LOT of destroyed transistors if you do that . . . Also, be w7ni@e................................................................BOTH endsof the short wire are disconnected before connecting one end toanother partof the circuit . . . .. upperStan, signalhalf of screen and I have a small deflection of a square wave haveso gain is poor. Should Q374and Q474 be a matched duo? the Qgiven me. mikeHi Mike, numbers was the one I now have up for sale on eBay right now. Youshould look at auction #1226363944 and think about bidding on it.You can test those for most defects with an ohmmeter right on the bench.and see if this forces the trace to the center of the screen. If it does,then I would say Q394 and Q494 are good and you need to progress with theshorting process to the previous stage, etc....................................................................... Stan, Well I have located a manual, I bid on the one you had on Ebay but it got out of hand in short order! ( I know you were happy!) Anyway I have located my problems. (plural) turns out someone had lifted the end of D388 to check it at some time and the choke on the back side of the board had come off. Also Q388 was bad I replaced the transistor and resoldered the choke and things got interesting! The position controls were working but gain was still way off. I started checking for gain in each stage from the delay line and got as far as Q 464,364 at this point gain fell drastically! :( Well I Pulled those and low and behold they were npn not the expected pnp, I replaced with two 151-0193 and I have a new scope!!!! (This scope came from IBM so I really don't Know what to think about this?) So in closing I want to thank you for all your help It was very nice of you to take the time. Now I have this 2213 that the trace only covers half of screen........ thanks. Mike Smith
|
|
Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@...>
Hi Mike,
Good news! It is always great to hear of a success like yours. More comments below . . . mtmpsmp@yahoo.com wrote: Stan,Well, there are marginal technicians in every company . . . So in closing I want to thank you for all your help It was very niceHalf the screen horizontaly or vertically? I might have some ideas on this, too, if you are stuck . . . thanks. Mike SmithOK, Mike. My pleasure. Stan w7ni@easystreet.com
|
|
mtmpsmp@...
--- In TekScopes@y..., Stan or Patricia Griffiths <w7ni@e...> wrote:
Hi Mike,on this, too, if you are stuck . . .......................................................................thanks. Mike SmithOK, Mike. My pleasure. The trace starts on center of screen and runs to right side, Vertical seems to be ok. The output transistors voltages are comparable but signal on + plate is very weak. I don't have manual for this one but layout looks very close to my 2235 . although parts are numbered different. Mike
|
|