|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
With geometry only slightly out of calibration as you state, I wouldn't mind about the slight influence. In general, it's less of a shift than what you cause by adjusting, i.e. if you straighten by
With geometry only slightly out of calibration as you state, I wouldn't mind about the slight influence. In general, it's less of a shift than what you cause by adjusting, i.e. if you straighten by
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#141842
·
|
|
Re: 7A13 Vc readout options
Today a little DVM is easy and tiny, but back then, it
was a mess of digital circuitry. The DVMs they made for
the TM500 frames aren't exactly empty shells.
Today I would take a 8 pin DIP/SOIC
Today a little DVM is easy and tiny, but back then, it
was a mess of digital circuitry. The DVMs they made for
the TM500 frames aren't exactly empty shells.
Today I would take a 8 pin DIP/SOIC
|
By
Chuck Harris
·
#141841
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
adjusting geometry will be a problem as it changes the
relationship between the vertical/horizontal amplifiers
and the divisions on the screen. Its purpose is to warp
the deflection field so that the
adjusting geometry will be a problem as it changes the
relationship between the vertical/horizontal amplifiers
and the divisions on the screen. Its purpose is to warp
the deflection field so that the
|
By
Chuck Harris
·
#141840
·
|
|
7A13 Vc readout options
While working on these 7A13s, I often wondered why Tek didn't just put the Vc comparison voltage display right on the CRT readout. There's a whole blank lower readout spot available, but they opted
While working on these 7A13s, I often wondered why Tek didn't just put the Vc comparison voltage display right on the CRT readout. There's a whole blank lower readout spot available, but they opted
|
By
Ed Breya
·
#141839
·
|
|
Re: Leo Bodnar TD Pulser
Unfortunately, you can't measure or adjust a scope accurately with a
pulse that narrow. This can also be a problem with avalanche pulsers.
Unfortunately, you can't measure or adjust a scope accurately with a
pulse that narrow. This can also be a problem with avalanche pulsers.
|
By
David DiGiacomo
·
#141838
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
Adjusting Geometry should not be a problem. Just placing the jumper in the CAL position is no problem but make sure you don't select or even do any of the "fly-by-wire" adjustments. The unsafe ones
Adjusting Geometry should not be a problem. Just placing the jumper in the CAL position is no problem but make sure you don't select or even do any of the "fly-by-wire" adjustments. The unsafe ones
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#141837
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
It's not only the edge focus, there is tiny bit of curvature on the delta_t cursors when I move them close to the left/right sides. So I plan to do to the CAL08 which needs the jumper to be positioned
It's not only the edge focus, there is tiny bit of curvature on the delta_t cursors when I move them close to the left/right sides. So I plan to do to the CAL08 which needs the jumper to be positioned
|
By
Amir Bozorgi
·
#141836
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
CRT adjustments like trace rotation, (edge/high drive) focus and grid bias have no influence on calibration status. Still, since you mention only edge focus to be slightly off, I would just touch the
CRT adjustments like trace rotation, (edge/high drive) focus and grid bias have no influence on calibration status. Still, since you mention only edge focus to be slightly off, I would just touch the
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#141835
·
|
|
Re: 7a13 observations
Thanks for your contributions, Ed. I will be following your work with interest.
Dave Wise
Thanks for your contributions, Ed. I will be following your work with interest.
Dave Wise
|
By
Dave Wise
·
#141834
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
yes, maybe that pin is somehow disconnected although physically the J119 socket seems very fine and pretty much untouched in the past. I just found pin 17 of J511 on A5 thanks to your lead. This is
yes, maybe that pin is somehow disconnected although physically the J119 socket seems very fine and pretty much untouched in the past. I just found pin 17 of J511 on A5 thanks to your lead. This is
|
By
Amir Bozorgi
·
#141833
·
|
|
Re: 7854 adding more memory.
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for the update.
I would appreciate updates from Nathan on the progress of his replacement
RAM/ROM card.
Dennis Tillman W7PF
Hi Cliff,
Thanks for the update.
I would appreciate updates from Nathan on the progress of his replacement
RAM/ROM card.
Dennis Tillman W7PF
|
By
Dennis Tillman W7pF
·
#141832
·
|
|
Re: 7a13 observations
I'm wrapping up this 7A13 project for now, but wanted to offer some suggestions for those with busted mechanical readout type 7A13s. I will start a fresh thread for this.
Ed
I'm wrapping up this 7A13 project for now, but wanted to offer some suggestions for those with busted mechanical readout type 7A13s. I will start a fresh thread for this.
Ed
|
By
Ed Breya
·
#141831
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
as I explained, the voltage on pin 13 of J119 is zero and everything with the scope works! I have checked it many times.
as I explained, the voltage on pin 13 of J119 is zero and everything with the scope works! I have checked it many times.
|
By
Amir Bozorgi
·
#141830
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
Since you're writing that your 2465A operates correctly, incl. cursor movement etc., it seems a simple case of a broken connection to J119 pin 13. Since you need that pin only for calibration, you may
Since you're writing that your 2465A operates correctly, incl. cursor movement etc., it seems a simple case of a broken connection to J119 pin 13. Since you need that pin only for calibration, you may
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#141829
·
|
|
Re: adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
The DAC adjustment section is clearly detailed in the
calibration section of the manual, to wit, section 5-10.
To do the adjustment, you have to be using a DVM in DC
mode, and measure between J119
The DAC adjustment section is clearly detailed in the
calibration section of the manual, to wit, section 5-10.
To do the adjustment, you have to be using a DVM in DC
mode, and measure between J119
|
By
Chuck Harris
·
#141828
·
|
|
Re: 500 series fan balancing
The 500 series was never a quiet scope. The air motion
is pretty loud.
It is actually better for noise if the fan blades are
not all perfectly the same. Perfection allows the creation
of
The 500 series was never a quiet scope. The air motion
is pretty loud.
It is actually better for noise if the fan blades are
not all perfectly the same. Perfection allows the creation
of
|
By
Chuck Harris
·
#141827
·
|
|
adjusting DAC REF voltage on 2465A
I recently obtained a very cheap 2465A (US $180 delivered) and just recapped it. The serial number is B019XXX
All voltages on J119 are now perfect both in terms of DC value and noise.
Everything
I recently obtained a very cheap 2465A (US $180 delivered) and just recapped it. The serial number is B019XXX
All voltages on J119 are now perfect both in terms of DC value and noise.
Everything
|
By
Amir Bozorgi
·
#141826
·
|
|
500 series fan balancing
Hi Group,
The fan on my 536 is in good overall condition, motor bearings are fine,
but it vibrates considerably and produces annoying low freq noise. I did my
best to square the blades using a black
Hi Group,
The fan on my 536 is in good overall condition, motor bearings are fine,
but it vibrates considerably and produces annoying low freq noise. I did my
best to square the blades using a black
|
By
Nenad Filipovic
·
#141825
·
|
|
Re: Leo Bodnar TD Pulser
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, 'Leon Vogt' leevogt@... [TekScopes] wrote:
There is yet another option :) One can use HP 33002A SRD Module driven with
500 mW (~27dBm) 100 MHz sinusoidal signal. That will
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, 'Leon Vogt' leevogt@... [TekScopes] wrote:
There is yet another option :) One can use HP 33002A SRD Module driven with
500 mW (~27dBm) 100 MHz sinusoidal signal. That will
|
By
Sergey Kubushyn
·
#141824
·
|
|
Re: Leo Bodnar TD Pulser
Craig:
I agree with you that Leo's Pulsar deserves consideration. The software
options, quality of build and price are very attractive. I received mine in
under a week. I turned around and ordered
Craig:
I agree with you that Leo's Pulsar deserves consideration. The software
options, quality of build and price are very attractive. I received mine in
under a week. I turned around and ordered
|
By
Leevogt_98
·
#141823
·
|