|
516 in Indianapolis
https://indianapolis.craigslist.org/ele/d/indianapolis-tektronix-516-oscilloscope/7457356704.html
Craigslist 516 in Indianapolis, $150. I don't know the seller.
https://indianapolis.craigslist.org/ele/d/indianapolis-tektronix-516-oscilloscope/7457356704.html
Craigslist 516 in Indianapolis, $150. I don't know the seller.
|
By
Bruce Atwood
·
#191654
·
|
|
Looks Like vintagetek.org Has Been Hacked
I tried to go to the museum page today and it takes me to a male ED drug seller site. Can someone contact them and let them know please?
I tried to go to the museum page today and it takes me to a male ED drug seller site. Can someone contact them and let them know please?
|
By
RellikJM
·
#191653
·
|
|
Re: Type 106 Saga (Again)
Stephen,
I was a nice situation that you found the culprit this way, especially because the specified condition in the Power Supply diagram is quite weird. I only noted that because I tried to
Stephen,
I was a nice situation that you found the culprit this way, especially because the specified condition in the Power Supply diagram is quite weird. I only noted that because I tried to
|
By
Albert Otten
·
#191652
·
|
|
Re: 468 Power Switch
The vintageTEK Museum has restored a number of 468's and has some parts units left. We could supply these parts. Where are you located?
--
Bob Haas
The vintageTEK Museum has restored a number of 468's and has some parts units left. We could supply these parts. Where are you located?
--
Bob Haas
|
By
Bob Haas
·
#191651
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Rogerio,
It occurred to me after my post is if you question if a resistor in the string is bad, unsolder one lead of one resistor. This makes the circuit an open circuit to anything on either end.
Rogerio,
It occurred to me after my post is if you question if a resistor in the string is bad, unsolder one lead of one resistor. This makes the circuit an open circuit to anything on either end.
|
By
Mark Vincent
·
#191650
·
|
|
468 Power Switch
I'm looking for a source of a power switch 260-1849-00 for a 468 repair. Apparently this switch is used in a number of other scopes including 2445-series?
I also need the 2-part control shaft
I'm looking for a source of a power switch 260-1849-00 for a 468 repair. Apparently this switch is used in a number of other scopes including 2445-series?
I also need the 2-part control shaft
|
By
NigelP
·
#191649
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Thank you all for the replyes.
I will try to follow the traces, although this might prove to be difficult in the577 without taking out the PCB.
Regards,
Roger
Thank you all for the replyes.
I will try to follow the traces, although this might prove to be difficult in the577 without taking out the PCB.
Regards,
Roger
|
By
Rogerio O
·
#191648
·
|
|
locked
Re: RIFA MADNESS!!!
If this is purely capacitive (i.e., the cap hasn’t started leaking, which adds a resistive component), this would be indicative a few nF.
I don’t remember if you said what mains frequency and
If this is purely capacitive (i.e., the cap hasn’t started leaking, which adds a resistive component), this would be indicative a few nF.
I don’t remember if you said what mains frequency and
|
By
Carsten Bormann
·
#191647
·
|
|
locked
Re: RIFA MADNESS!!!
Brian,
That article from allaboutcircuits sounds very familiar, but reading it now I think I took too strong an implication from their discussion: that both X and Y had mandated failure modes, and
Brian,
That article from allaboutcircuits sounds very familiar, but reading it now I think I took too strong an implication from their discussion: that both X and Y had mandated failure modes, and
|
By
Jeff Dutky
·
#191646
·
|
|
Re: Type 106 Saga (Again)
Hi all,
Taking into account all your recommendations and suggestions, I finally fixed my Type 106.
While I was about to make more measurements on the A supply, R233 burnt almost instantly after I
Hi all,
Taking into account all your recommendations and suggestions, I finally fixed my Type 106.
While I was about to make more measurements on the A supply, R233 burnt almost instantly after I
|
By
Stephen
·
#191644
·
|
|
locked
Re: RIFA MADNESS!!!
I seemed to remember something about particular failure modes - open & short so I looked around online.
The pages below are general ones not manufacturer sites.
A few online sources state that the X
I seemed to remember something about particular failure modes - open & short so I looked around online.
The pages below are general ones not manufacturer sites.
A few online sources state that the X
|
By
Brian Symons
·
#191643
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Barry,
Thanks for correcting me about cam switches. I figured they were from 1 to _ from front to back. That would be the logical thing to do. The cam "numbering" I too can get confused with. Out
Barry,
Thanks for correcting me about cam switches. I figured they were from 1 to _ from front to back. That would be the logical thing to do. The cam "numbering" I too can get confused with. Out
|
By
Mark Vincent
·
#191642
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
I ran into this with at least one 7000-series plugin. If I recall correctly, the switch contacts weren't numbered from front to back, back to front, or any other scheme I could identify. It was a
I ran into this with at least one 7000-series plugin. If I recall correctly, the switch contacts weren't numbered from front to back, back to front, or any other scheme I could identify. It was a
|
By
n4buq
·
#191641
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Rogerio,
Contact 1 should be the same on a cam as a rotary switch. The first contact number should be the closest to the front/shaft. Ryder's manuals showed the 1 parts of the switches with layered
Rogerio,
Contact 1 should be the same on a cam as a rotary switch. The first contact number should be the closest to the front/shaft. Ryder's manuals showed the 1 parts of the switches with layered
|
By
Mark Vincent
·
#191640
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
Is this convention used for the cam switches also?
If affirmative, contact 1 would be the closest to the "front" or shaft .
Regads,
Roger
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
Is this convention used for the cam switches also?
If affirmative, contact 1 would be the closest to the "front" or shaft .
Regads,
Roger
|
By
Rogerio O
·
#191639
·
|
|
Re: Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Rogerio,
The F and R are front and rear. One is the wafer closest to the shaft behind the metal wafer with the collar for the shaft. Position 1 is usually the fully CCW (anticlockwise) rotation
Rogerio,
The F and R are front and rear. One is the wafer closest to the shaft behind the metal wafer with the collar for the shaft. Position 1 is usually the fully CCW (anticlockwise) rotation
|
By
Mark Vincent
·
#191638
·
|
|
Contact numbering rules for tektronix cam and rotary switches
Dear all,
I am trying to fix a Tek 577 and would like to check the operation of some specific contacts of the Step Offset Ampl cam switch as well as the 177 Vertical Cuurent/Div rotary switch
I can
Dear all,
I am trying to fix a Tek 577 and would like to check the operation of some specific contacts of the Step Offset Ampl cam switch as well as the 177 Vertical Cuurent/Div rotary switch
I can
|
By
Rogerio O
·
#191637
·
|
|
Tektronix 177 not working in nA ranges
Hi everyone.
I am unable to complete the calibration of a 577/177 I am working on.
I narrowed down the possible culprits to the vertical amplifier (in the 577) or the vertical pre-amplifier (in the
Hi everyone.
I am unable to complete the calibration of a 577/177 I am working on.
I narrowed down the possible culprits to the vertical amplifier (in the 577) or the vertical pre-amplifier (in the
|
By
Rogerio O
·
#191636
·
|
|
Re: Interesting Lissajous
Thanks for that, Peter.
Raymond
Thanks for that, Peter.
Raymond
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#191635
·
|
|
Re: Interesting Lissajous
There are 7000-series scopes beside the 7104 that X-Y phase compensation boards.
As far as I can tell it was standard in the 7503 and 7504 in 1969, and optional in later models, e.g. the 7704 (Opt.2)
There are 7000-series scopes beside the 7104 that X-Y phase compensation boards.
As far as I can tell it was standard in the 7503 and 7504 in 1969, and optional in later models, e.g. the 7704 (Opt.2)
|
By
Peter H
·
#191634
·
|