|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
Ok, so they automated it, at least some. The negative supply to the display should not be adjusted from what I know, the contrast is a separate line.
Looking at the display's data sheet, the -VEE
Ok, so they automated it, at least some. The negative supply to the display should not be adjusted from what I know, the contrast is a separate line.
Looking at the display's data sheet, the -VEE
|
By
Harvey White
·
#191609
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
The old display has no pot on it. Measurements I've made suggest the THS720P adjusts the contrast by varing the negative supply to the display. I do see some change in the display as I vary the
The old display has no pot on it. Measurements I've made suggest the THS720P adjusts the contrast by varing the negative supply to the display. I do see some change in the display as I vary the
|
By
JOE
·
#191608
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
That's an STN display. All the ones that I've ever seen have a contrast adjustment, generally a variable voltage. For graphics displays I think it was a negative voltage, for the little 7 segment
That's an STN display. All the ones that I've ever seen have a contrast adjustment, generally a variable voltage. For graphics displays I think it was a negative voltage, for the little 7 segment
|
By
Harvey White
·
#191607
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
I am still fighting with my replacement LCD display. My latest theory is per the Sharp spec the display expects a contrast pot between pin 11 and pin 12 of the interface. From the THS700 service
I am still fighting with my replacement LCD display. My latest theory is per the Sharp spec the display expects a contrast pot between pin 11 and pin 12 of the interface. From the THS700 service
|
By
JOE
·
#191606
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
The reason I'm replacing the display is the LCD panel has delaminated, or something of that sort.
I too have successfully replaced CCFLs with LCDs on some units.
The reason I'm replacing the display is the LCD panel has delaminated, or something of that sort.
I too have successfully replaced CCFLs with LCDs on some units.
|
By
JOE
·
#191605
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
I do something similar, but since I'm doing battery operated equipment where the highest desired voltage is 5.0 volts, I use an individual dropping resistor per LED. Definitely not the most
I do something similar, but since I'm doing battery operated equipment where the highest desired voltage is 5.0 volts, I use an individual dropping resistor per LED. Definitely not the most
|
By
Harvey White
·
#191604
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
I have repaired a whole bunch of displays in marine equipment using led strips.
These a usually segments of three leds in series with a small resister.
Then it's "rinse and re[eat" to the next
I have repaired a whole bunch of displays in marine equipment using led strips.
These a usually segments of three leds in series with a small resister.
Then it's "rinse and re[eat" to the next
|
By
Bert Haskins
·
#191603
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
Hi,
Love to hear more about what you did to replace the displays.
Many thanks,
John aka DBN
Hi,
Love to hear more about what you did to replace the displays.
Many thanks,
John aka DBN
|
By
druid_noibn
·
#191602
·
|
|
Re: Help required finding a Tek 466 power rail short
Ok, interleaved:
And there's the first problem. I'm using the 468 power supply (ought to be close) as a reference. Bridge rectifiers can be used two ways, one is a full wave bridge. The +5 volt
Ok, interleaved:
And there's the first problem. I'm using the 468 power supply (ought to be close) as a reference. Bridge rectifiers can be used two ways, one is a full wave bridge. The +5 volt
|
By
Harvey White
·
#191601
·
|
|
Re: Tek FG501
Thanks EJP and Dave now I am more confused my manual which matches my later SN has all the test points for both units and shows two different PCBs its the early SN unit that does not match the manual
Thanks EJP and Dave now I am more confused my manual which matches my later SN has all the test points for both units and shows two different PCBs its the early SN unit that does not match the manual
|
By
jeff_a_bowman@outlook.com
·
#191600
·
|
|
Re: Continuing saga of the 7904
Thanks Roger,
Your advice was very useful and eventually indirectly led me to solving the problem! The HV at its test point was constant and about 1.3% high at 3 KV which I decided to accept but when
Thanks Roger,
Your advice was very useful and eventually indirectly led me to solving the problem! The HV at its test point was constant and about 1.3% high at 3 KV which I decided to accept but when
|
By
Morris Odell
·
#191597
·
|
|
Re: Replacing display in Tek THS700 scope
I replaced the CCFL in two THS720's with LED's. It makes an enormous improvement. Its not hard but it is a little involved. You will need a step up inverter and a backlight regulator. LED strips can
I replaced the CCFL in two THS720's with LED's. It makes an enormous improvement. Its not hard but it is a little involved. You will need a step up inverter and a backlight regulator. LED strips can
|
By
demianm_1
·
#191596
·
|
|
Re: Type 106 Saga (Again)
Albert, PF,
Hopefully I will be able to make more measurements today. Sorry if I’ve been responding a bit later lately.
Family issues.
Albert, PF,
Hopefully I will be able to make more measurements today. Sorry if I’ve been responding a bit later lately.
Family issues.
|
By
Stephen
·
#191595
·
|
|
Re: Help required finding a Tek 466 power rail short
Hi Harvey.
As the scope was essentially dead with only 0.6v at the test points on the 15v, 5v, -8v and -15v rails with 38 and 43 volts on the 140 and 65v test points respectively with no lights,
Hi Harvey.
As the scope was essentially dead with only 0.6v at the test points on the 15v, 5v, -8v and -15v rails with 38 and 43 volts on the 140 and 65v test points respectively with no lights,
|
By
James55
·
#191594
·
|
|
Re: Tek FG501
Jeff
U410 changed from a "Tektronix Selected part" to a Motorola Part MC1436CG at serial B130000. . The "Tektronix selected part" may have been a Motorola part as well that was sorted for some
Jeff
U410 changed from a "Tektronix Selected part" to a Motorola Part MC1436CG at serial B130000. . The "Tektronix selected part" may have been a Motorola part as well that was sorted for some
|
By
Dave / NR1DX
·
#191593
·
|
|
Re: Tek FG501
Manual states U410 is Tek part no 156-0400-00, and the cross reference gives Motorola part no MC1436CG, a high voltage (+-30V) 1MHz 94dB op-amp.
EJP
Manual states U410 is Tek part no 156-0400-00, and the cross reference gives Motorola part no MC1436CG, a high voltage (+-30V) 1MHz 94dB op-amp.
EJP
|
By
EJP
·
#191592
·
|
|
Re: Help required finding a Tek 466 power rail short
you have a number of linear supplies: transformer secondary driving bridge which is hooked up to the main filter capacitor,
there is, in normal power supply design theory, no way to get voltage at
you have a number of linear supplies: transformer secondary driving bridge which is hooked up to the main filter capacitor,
there is, in normal power supply design theory, no way to get voltage at
|
By
Harvey White
·
#191591
·
|
|
Re: Tek 151-1042-00 : Matched JFET in a 7B80
Looks like they didn't include those on the upper JFET's gate - just capacitively-coupled through a 12pF cap to the upper FET's gate.
Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
Looks like they didn't include those on the upper JFET's gate - just capacitively-coupled through a 12pF cap to the upper FET's gate.
Thanks,
Barry - N4BUQ
|
By
n4buq
·
#191590
·
|
|
Re: Help required finding a Tek 466 power rail short
Hi all,
last update for the evening.
I didn't quite do as planned as forgot about the 65v and 140v bridge CR1721 and started from the 15v bridge instead.
But hey, that gave out 17v, and the fan
Hi all,
last update for the evening.
I didn't quite do as planned as forgot about the 65v and 140v bridge CR1721 and started from the 15v bridge instead.
But hey, that gave out 17v, and the fan
|
By
James55
·
#191589
·
|
|
Re: Tek 151-1042-00 : Matched JFET in a 7B80
Those diodes are then to protect the IC, not the JFETs. There should be one more clamp, possibly two, at the front end to protect the upper JFET's gate. Ed
Those diodes are then to protect the IC, not the JFETs. There should be one more clamp, possibly two, at the front end to protect the upper JFET's gate. Ed
|
By
Ed Breya
·
#191588
·
|