|
Re: Tek 7834 Question
Hi GerhardMine does the same , or it did before the power supply went into tick mode , not had time to fix that yet . I put it down to expectations of a bi-stable screen like that in a 564 or a 549
Hi GerhardMine does the same , or it did before the power supply went into tick mode , not had time to fix that yet . I put it down to expectations of a bi-stable screen like that in a 564 or a 549
|
By
Brian
·
#166272
·
|
|
Tek 7834 Question
Has anyone experience with the TEK 7834 400 MHz mainframe?
About 20 years ago I bought a used 7834 mainframe for the 7S11/7T11
plug-ins. At that time I wondered about the storage function.
When
Has anyone experience with the TEK 7834 400 MHz mainframe?
About 20 years ago I bought a used 7834 mainframe for the 7S11/7T11
plug-ins. At that time I wondered about the storage function.
When
|
By
Gerhard Hofbauer <gerhard.hofbauer@...>
·
#166271
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
I had an interesting situation which I done that as well
On the PCB board of DC electronic load a white dot was marked to indicate pin 1, however on the IC socket it indicated the pin on the opposite
I had an interesting situation which I done that as well
On the PCB board of DC electronic load a white dot was marked to indicate pin 1, however on the IC socket it indicated the pin on the opposite
|
By
DW
·
#166270
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
Actually, you can see the notch and STILL install it backards.
Been there, done that.
Paul
--
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Manchester MI, USA
Aurora Group of Michigan, LLC |
Actually, you can see the notch and STILL install it backards.
Been there, done that.
Paul
--
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Manchester MI, USA
Aurora Group of Michigan, LLC |
|
By
Paul Amaranth
·
#166269
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
Thanks for the correction and the valuable information
The reason for confusion is that In the past I have dealt with IC's that referenced pin 1 with a circle, you can see this in the link
Thanks for the correction and the valuable information
The reason for confusion is that In the past I have dealt with IC's that referenced pin 1 with a circle, you can see this in the link
|
By
DW
·
#166268
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
see www.hakanh.com/dl/docs/hardtofind/200-0950-00.pdf
/Håkan
see www.hakanh.com/dl/docs/hardtofind/200-0950-00.pdf
/Håkan
|
By
zenith5106
·
#166267
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
I looked inside my 7704A and verified that all the 200-0950-00 COVER, ELEC CONN:PLASTIC are there.
I don't see them so fragile, and they are solidly attached (inserted?) to the connector body.
I looked inside my 7704A and verified that all the 200-0950-00 COVER, ELEC CONN:PLASTIC are there.
I don't see them so fragile, and they are solidly attached (inserted?) to the connector body.
|
By
Ernesto
·
#166266
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
My saying "*About* 1 inch by 3 inch" indicates that it was just a
guesstimate.
I was giving an approximate size to eliminate any of the other parts,
particularly any "prismatic" parts, from the
My saying "*About* 1 inch by 3 inch" indicates that it was just a
guesstimate.
I was giving an approximate size to eliminate any of the other parts,
particularly any "prismatic" parts, from the
|
By
Chuck Harris
·
#166265
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
The notch is pin 1, lower left corner in your photo. the part number is
near pin 7. This is a quad 2 input NAND gate device from the fist vintage
of 7400 series TTL. Made in 1972.
Tom Bowers
The notch is pin 1, lower left corner in your photo. the part number is
near pin 7. This is a quad 2 input NAND gate device from the fist vintage
of 7400 series TTL. Made in 1972.
Tom Bowers
|
By
Tom Bowers
·
#166264
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
The notch identifies pin 1 which is at the lower left.
That's also a quad nand gate, not an op amp.
The circle is a mold mark.
--
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Manchester MI, USA
The notch identifies pin 1 which is at the lower left.
That's also a quad nand gate, not an op amp.
The circle is a mold mark.
--
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Manchester MI, USA
|
By
Paul Amaranth
·
#166263
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
I meant to say Quad Dual Input NAND device.
Carl
I meant to say Quad Dual Input NAND device.
Carl
|
By
Carl Hallberg
·
#166262
·
|
|
Re: SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
It is not an op amp. It is a quad nand gate. On round devices, the tab is the last pin.
Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)
It is not an op amp. It is a quad nand gate. On round devices, the tab is the last pin.
Carl Hallberg (W9CJH)
|
By
Carl Hallberg
·
#166261
·
|
|
SN7400N Quad opamp which side is pin 1?
https://groups.io/g/TekScopes/album?id=245683
Here is a rather unusual design at least for me. This chip contains both the notch and the circle, I want to say the notch is pin 1 but I am not 100%
https://groups.io/g/TekScopes/album?id=245683
Here is a rather unusual design at least for me. This chip contains both the notch and the circle, I want to say the notch is pin 1 but I am not 100%
|
By
DW
·
#166260
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
Yes, Steve, that is what I understand to be the item in question. However, I wouldn't particularly call them "pins", more "connectors" as they are thin and flat; I think of "pins" as being more
Yes, Steve, that is what I understand to be the item in question. However, I wouldn't particularly call them "pins", more "connectors" as they are thin and flat; I think of "pins" as being more
|
By
Colin Herbert
·
#166259
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
Colin and David,
If you look at eBay item: 133386313435 it is the plug-in backplane for a
7854.
In the fourth photo, I believe it shows one of the connectors that is
missing the cover on one side of
Colin and David,
If you look at eBay item: 133386313435 it is the plug-in backplane for a
7854.
In the fourth photo, I believe it shows one of the connectors that is
missing the cover on one side of
|
By
stevenhorii
·
#166258
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
Thank You, David, I am now un-flummoxed. It is exactly the part that I was thinking of, but the 3 inch measurement is way too short. As you suggest 4 inch is about right. These parts are also used on
Thank You, David, I am now un-flummoxed. It is exactly the part that I was thinking of, but the 3 inch measurement is way too short. As you suggest 4 inch is about right. These parts are also used on
|
By
Colin Herbert
·
#166257
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
For avoidance of doubt this is p/n 200-0950-00 shown on the mechanical parts breakdowns in all the 7000 series Service manuals.
There are two of these used on each plugin socket on the main interface
For avoidance of doubt this is p/n 200-0950-00 shown on the mechanical parts breakdowns in all the 7000 series Service manuals.
There are two of these used on each plugin socket on the main interface
|
By
David C. Partridge
·
#166256
·
|
|
Re: Vacuum forming 7K interface "covers"
I thought that I knew what you were talking about until you gave the size as 1 inch by 3 inches. I am now flummoxed, because that isn't the size of the plastic parts that keep the (gold-plated)
I thought that I knew what you were talking about until you gave the size as 1 inch by 3 inches. I am now flummoxed, because that isn't the size of the plastic parts that keep the (gold-plated)
|
By
Colin Herbert
·
#166255
·
|
|
Cool videos on 570 Curve Tracer
I was not aware of this YouTuber (TomTekTests) until I stumbled across this video on a 570 restoration.
https://youtu.be/AphQLWbN8nI
Here is part 2:
https://youtu.be/U2GVbmi4Wso
Makes me want a
I was not aware of this YouTuber (TomTekTests) until I stumbled across this video on a 570 restoration.
https://youtu.be/AphQLWbN8nI
Here is part 2:
https://youtu.be/U2GVbmi4Wso
Makes me want a
|
By
David Berlind
·
#166254
·
|
|
Re: Electrolytic Capacitor Removal NO Desoldering Required
Well said, Yachad, especially setting off professionalism against rigid traditionalism. Doing things in an unorthodox way can work!
You gave very clear instructions.
And you even express my stated
Well said, Yachad, especially setting off professionalism against rigid traditionalism. Doing things in an unorthodox way can work!
You gave very clear instructions.
And you even express my stated
|
By
Raymond Domp Frank
·
#166253
·
|