Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Richard R. Pope
Sergey,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
What about the lack of Cables, Keyboard, and Mouse? My understanding is that the Keyboard and Mouse are special. GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 10:34 PM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, jafinch78 . wrote:Does this contain more modules and is a better price for what you areYep, I would say this one is much better. It is 16702B, it has 16555A module
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, jafinch78 . wrote:
Does this contain more modules and is a better price for what you areYep, I would say this one is much better. It is 16702B, it has 16555A module that has 8 times 16712A memory and it also has 16712A and 16550A modules if you need those. I would recommend getting 16556D blade with even more memory that comes out handy at times -- those can be found really cheap. LCD is not all that important but you can replace it for the sake of completeness if you want. It is regular 12.1" 800x600 LCD, nothing special. --- ****************************************************************** * KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. * * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. * ******************************************************************
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Richard R. Pope
JA,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Nope. There are no cables, keyboard, or mouse. That alone makes this one a non-starter. The cables can cost as much or more than the Analyzer. I do appreciate the information. GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 10:10 PM, jafinch78 . wrote:
Does this contain more modules and is a better price for what you are looking for? https://www.ebay.com/itm/292413119401?
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Does this contain more modules and is a better price for what you are looking for? https://www.ebay.com/itm/292413119401?
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Richard R. Pope
Kevin,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The amount that I am budgeting is between $250 and $400 including cables, CD, Manual; If Possible;, and shipping. I will be working with levels of +-5VDC most of the time and sometimes +-15VDC. 16 Channels is useable but better and more useful is at least 48 channels. This covers the Address lines, Data lines, Status lines, and the Control lines of 8 and 16 bit S100 computers. I could have used one last week. The 10baseT on the 16702A will work fine for me. I really don't need to setup a HP-IB network. I know and I have been doing a lot of research on these. I would like a Saleae but there is that 16 Channel barrier. What do you think of this machine? https://www.ebay.com/itm/253358003032 GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 8:42 PM, Kevin Oconnor wrote:
Hi Richard,
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 06:42 pm, Kevin Oconnor wrote:
I was wondering if anyone was going to comment regarding using a Pico Scope, Red Pitaya or Analog/Digital Discovery? From my readings the later looks to be the most versitile of those type systems. Anyone with experience using?
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Kevin Oconnor
Hi Richard,
First, how much do you want to spend? What logic levels do you want to work with? How many channels do you need? What protocols do you want to use? You can buy a new logic analyzer for many $K. Or you can buy a used HP or Tek dedicated box that's 10, 20 or 30 years old that supports 1980's protocols. Or you can buy a new USB based unit like a $600 Saleae 16 channel Pro that decodes modern protocols. Or you can buy a $50 Saleae logic 16 channel nockoff that suits many users and supports the same modern protocols.
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Richard R. Pope
Paul,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I also appreciate this information. GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 7:51 PM, Paul Amaranth wrote:
Here it is:
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Paul Amaranth
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:55:37PM +0100, Hans Boon wrote:
Where can I find the decoding software in GITHUB? --
Paul Amaranth, GCIH | Rochester MI, USA Aurora Group, Inc. | Security, Systems & Software paul@... | Unix & Windows
|
|
Re: Pinouts for Ukraine Germanium Transistor
I am very happy with the quality of these Ukrainian Germanium transistors.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Consistent parameters all always good to see. I am very impressed with the curve tracer screen I am disappointed in that people claim these GT320V transistors are an equivalent to the 2N2635. In no way can the GT320V be used as a direct substitute for a 2N2635, and this has nothing to do with the straight-line pinout. Thank you to everyone who gave answers to my pinout question. Gary
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Leo Bodnar <leo@...> wrote:
The closest to official datasheet I can find is the product announcement --
Gary Robert Bosworth grbosworth@... Tel: 310-317-2247
|
|
Re: Questions on impedance matching
Ted Rook
David
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
PS Compared to the precision and rigor that are found in RF work computing and video the world of audio can sometimes seem sloppy by comparison. Our hearing is a something of an enigma because in some ways it is sophisticated, sound source location, and frequency discrimination for example, and in some ways it is primitive, the thresholds for just detectable changes can be quite large under some conditions and quite small in others. For an audio device to reproduce sound free from obvious degradation does not require sophisticated or expensive hardware, this was achieved in the 1950s with tube amplifiers and moving coil loudspeakers. There is a website you may find helpful, it is what remains from the work of the late Dr Jim Leach at Georgia Tech, there is probably a link there to his course text book http://leachlegacy.ece.gatech.edu/audiothings.html Best Ted Rook
On 12 Feb 2018 at 20:05, Ted Rook wrote:
Yes I agree, with 600 ohms attached the terminal voltage is the nominal value, with open circuit it is double. In audio we NEVER match source and load impedances, not with small signals nor with power amplifiers and loudspeakers. The universal system comprises low source impedances and high load impedances, ratios of 1:10 to 1:1000 are common. Things are happening in audio at such a slow speed that reflected energy is irrelevant. Reflections don't cause "distortion" in audio. Distortion in audio occurs due to non-linearity in the amplification and from abuse of amplification by the connection of load impedances below the rated value. DECIBELS ratio of two voltages expressed in dB is 20 times the log base10 of the ratio in round numbers: double is +6dB half is -6dB 3x is +10dB 10x is +20dB 100x is +40dB ratio of two powers expressed in dB is 10 times the log base 10 of the ratio in round numbers: double is +3dB half is -3dB 10x is +10dB 100x is +20dB Hope this helps Ted On 12 Feb 2018 at 6:34, David Berlind wrote: thank you @tedR: when you say "if it (the 600 ohms) is absent," you actually mean if there's no load at all. Because, according to the math, other loads (above or below 600 ohms) should not necessarily yield double the voltage. It will be somewhere in between. I'm trying to understand the use cases for where maximum power transfer (watts) trumps maximum voltage (amplitude) and vice versa. My assumption is that as you move off the maximum power transfer point (where impedances match), you get signal distortion due to refection and at that point, maximizing voltage means you're just maximizing a distorted signal which is not helpful in radio or cable communications, but might be desirable in audio. The relationship to dB is a new dimension for me. What's the math behind any dB calculations and what is optimal? What dB am I shooting for?
|
|
Re: Something you didn't know: What did Tek have to do with Packing Peanuts?
I use a mixture of peppermint oil, corn/soybean oil, dr bronners soap and water as a repellent for rodents.
For bugs; like fleas that might come with rodents kind, I'll add pennyroyal oil (don't let this contact you).
|
|
Re: Curve tracer plug-in for 500 series.-
bobkrassa
There is a manual for the Systron-Donner 9550 on ebay right now. Too pricey to buy just for curiosity but may be worth it to someone who owns one. I have no connection with the seller.
73 Bob Krassa ACØJL
|
|
Re: Questions on impedance matching
Ted Rook
Yes I agree, with 600 ohms attached the terminal voltage is the nominal value, with open
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
circuit it is double. In audio we NEVER match source and load impedances, not with small signals nor with power amplifiers and loudspeakers. The universal system comprises low source impedances and high load impedances, ratios of 1:10 to 1:1000 are common. Things are happening in audio at such a slow speed that reflected energy is irrelevant. Reflections don't cause "distortion" in audio. Distortion in audio occurs due to non-linearity in the amplification and from abuse of amplification by the connection of load impedances below the rated value. DECIBELS ratio of two voltages expressed in dB is 20 times the log base10 of the ratio in round numbers: double is +6dB half is -6dB 3x is +10dB 10x is +20dB 100x is +40dB ratio of two powers expressed in dB is 10 times the log base 10 of the ratio in round numbers: double is +3dB half is -3dB 10x is +10dB 100x is +20dB Hope this helps Ted
On 12 Feb 2018 at 6:34, David Berlind wrote:
thank you @tedR: when you say "if it (the 600 ohms) is absent," you actually mean if there's no load at all. Because, according to the math, other loads (above or below 600 ohms) should not necessarily yield double the voltage. It will be somewhere in between. I'm trying to understand the use cases for where maximum power transfer (watts) trumps maximum voltage (amplitude) and vice versa. My assumption is that as you move off the maximum power transfer point (where impedances match), you get signal distortion due to refection and at that point, maximizing voltage means you're just maximizing a distorted signal which is not helpful in radio or cable communications, but might be desirable in audio. The relationship to dB is a new dimension for me. What's the math behind any dB calculations and what is optimal? What dB am I shooting for?
|
|
Youtube link, I mentioned in previous email.
Leanna L Erickson <lle@...>
|
|
Re: Curve tracer plug-in for 500 series.-
Hi Sebasstian,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
It would be easier to read my comments on the 7CT1N and 5CT1N in the paper I wrote on my Vacuum Tube Curve Tracer adapter board. < http://www.ke5fx.com/A_VTCT_Adapter_for_All_Tektronix_SCTs_W7PF.pdf> Dennis Tillman W7PF
-----Original Message-----
From: TekScopes@groups.io [mailto:TekScopes@groups.io] On Behalf Of Sebastian Garcia Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 3:35 PM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Curve tracer plug-in for 500 series.- Thank you very much for your comments, Dennis. I'll read the CTs and CT plugins docs, to understand their ups and downs. I'm with low resources for this right now, but having here some 500-series scopes will try to leverage one for this. Best regards, Sebastian. Dennis Tillman W7PF wrote: Hi Sebastian, -- Dennis Tillman W7PF TekScopes Moderator
|
|
Re: Curve tracer plug-in for 500 series.-
Sebastian Garcia
Thank you very much for your comments, Dennis.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I'll read the CTs and CT plugins docs, to understand their ups and downs. I'm with low resources for this right now, but having here some 500-series scopes will try to leverage one for this. Best regards, Sebastian. Dennis Tillman W7PF wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations?
Richard R. Pope
Ed,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I believe that I am going to go with this one. He put up some more pictures. There are six cables in this machine. If I am looking at this correctly that would be 96 channels. He also has a copy of the CD. So for about $250 including the shipping I believe that this is a pretty good buy. GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 1:31 AM, ed beers wrote:
Keyboard an mouse are a plus since there are compatibility issues (mostly solvable by adding pullups).
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations? S-100 Bus
Richard R. Pope
Hello,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
To answer the question of why buy a Logic Analyzer for working with the S-100 buss? Because there are times when an LED based display or a scope just won't tell you the whole story. You just can't beat being able to see the various signals and the relationships between those signals. There is a Website: S100.computers.com that is dedicated to the S100 computer system. New boards are being manufactured and can be bought from there including LED based Diagnostic boards. GOD Bless and Thanks, rich!
On 2/12/2018 11:20 AM, hrgerson@... wrote:
Logic Analyzers for the S-100 Buss are nice & certainly handle faster issues.
|
|
Re: Logic Analyzer Recommendations? S-100 Bus
brasscat
The Jade Bus Probe was intended for hardware troubleshooting. S100 mainframes at Jade had one in each, installed in the last slot. Other S100 board producers also purchased it for the same purpose. It was IEEE double size, so when installed, directly and not on and extender, the display was visible. Very handy in finding dead or shorted signals in the newly produced boards that Jade manufactured.
Stan
|
|