I never considered DSOs and other digitally controlled equipment as
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Fly-by-Wire but that's an excellent analogy. Thanks.
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:10 PM Jeff Dutky <email@example.com> wrote:
The 2200-series WERE "cheap and flimsy" compared to the 400-series scopes
(well, the knobs and buttons were, at least. The cases were still pretty
well made), but that was by design: Tek was facing fierce competition from
Japanese manufacturers and they designed the 2200-series scopes to reduce
cost of parts and assembly (and, whether intentional, or just a fortuitous
side effect, of maintenance). The 2200-series scopes also wound up being
much lighter than the 400-series, but I'm not sure that is a cost-cutting
measure, or if it was meant as an improvement in user-experience (it
certainly is easier to haul a 2235 around than a 465).
The later 2200-series scopes, like the 2246, increased the cost cutting by
going to entirely (or mostly) digital controls, but this also allowed the
controls to be programmed by GPIB or loaded from saved settings, which was
another kind of user-experience improvement, though not one that everybody
appreciates in equal measure. Lots of folks, myself included, like solid,
direct mechanical controls rather than fly-by-wire instrumentation.
-- Jeff Dutky