Re: 475 questions


Oops! I meant that for Chuck, but thank you, also, for prompting that informative discussion!

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:07 PM, <> wrote:

Hi Raymond!

Wow! Thanks for the thorough explanation. I had been wondering about the
so-called capacitor "reforming."


On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 10:58 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:

Hi Raymond,

Old fashioned electrolytic capacitors have a fairly reactive,
(to aluminum) highly conductive, water based electrolyte.

The capacitor's leakage current creates an electrolytic cell
with the aluminum plates, and removes the oxide layer from the
cathode plate, and builds an oxide layer on the anode plate...

The oxide layer on the anode plate is the dielectric (insulator)
for the capacitor.

This reaction is the "reforming" process that lives on in
electrolytic capacitor lore... Even today. It is also a process
known colloquially as anodizing aluminum.

The aluminum oxide dielectric layer has competing issues:

As the oxide grows thicker, it became a better insulator, and works
to stop the leakage current necessary to grow the oxide layer thicker.

As the oxide layer ceases growing, the electrolyte dissolves the
oxide layer, allowing the leakage currents to increase... growing the
oxide layer thicker.

In normal operation, a balance is reached between leakage current
and growing the oxide layer.... A "working voltage" rating results.

The only way to increase the thickness of the oxide layer once
it reaches equilibrium, is to increase the voltage across the
electrolytic cell, making the cell's current increase, and in turn,
the oxide grow thicker... creating a new higher voltage equilibrium,
and a new "working voltage".

As long as the heat created by the leakage current doesn't raise
the temperature of the electrolyte to a point where the it boils,
the capacitor is fairly happy.

This means that higher than working voltage surges will start to
heat the electrolyte, but as long as the surge goes away before the
electrolyte boils, the capacitor will live to see another day.

One other factor needs mentioning:

The thinner the oxide dielectric layer, the higher the capacitance,
and the lower the working voltage.

The thicker the oxide dielectric layer, the lower the capacitance,
and the higher the working voltage.

The manufacturer had to balance all of these conditions when they
wrote the specifications for their old style electrolytic capacitors.

If you used these old electrolytic capacitors at a lower than working
voltage, their capacitance would increase, and their ability to
operate safely at their specified working voltage would diminish.

Unless you reformed the capacitor... safely limiting the current
until the oxide layer thickened...

Modern electrolytic capacitors use a nonreactive (to aluminum)
electrolyte and as a result, reforming is no longer necessary.

Modern electrolytic capacitors have their oxide layer created, and
their voltage rating determined, before the capacitor is even

-Chuck Harris

Raymond Domp Frank wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:07 PM, Eric wrote:

There are 2 fundamental differences that need to be taken in to account
replacing “vintage” caps. And I use the term vintage loosely. One is
tolerance. In the worst case I can remember a capacitors value was +150%
tolerance. The means that for a 1 uF the measured value of anything
2.5 uF to .1 uF would be considered “in spec” old radios still amaze
they ever worked. Now a days +-20% is the normal. The service manual will
you the tolerance of the filters. From memory I am guessing it is going
+100% to -20 % so pretty wide design tolerance on the filters.

The other important spec is the voltage rating of the cap. And here
caps and modern caps differ greatly. Vintage caps were very tolerant of
voltage especially given how tube gear warms up before the tube’s comes
to operation the B+ will spike some times as high as 200 to 250 volts
then when the device is operating and can hang there for about 15-30
This is not an issue in your 475 as it is solid state. However modern
completely intolerant of over voltage so if you have the physical space
always good to bump up the voltage rating of the cap it wont effect
to replace a 63V cap with a 400V cap excepta little cost in $ maybe one
and physical space it will be slightly bigger then it’s modern lower
counterpart. However both are usually smaller then their vintage counter
even doubling the voltage the modern can will be smaller physically.
I don't think anyone would have accepted caps with +150/-100% tolerance,
even electrolytics...

Any information on the inability of modern caps to withstand overvoltage
more than vintage caps used to? Maybe WV was just very conservatively
I'd rather have known the actual max.

For (wet) Al electrolytics, choosing a spec-voltage very much higher than
it's ever going to experience, has a deformation effect, so is not


Join to automatically receive all group messages.