I can't understand the 'you have to take it all' rule. How many people have room for some of these collections? Wouldn't it be nice just to get rid of as much as possible? Then what's left probably has minimal value and can be scrapped.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018, 3:11:35 PM PST, Artekmedia <email@example.com> wrote:
Wish I had thought of that one when I invited my late wife's friends
over to go through her shoes and clothes after she passed
( PS : Picked up a new 7A13 and a AM503 today to help complete my
collection..... :-) )
On 12/18/2018 5:46 PM, redarlington wrote:
My plan is simple. Anybody can have anything they want. But you have to
take it all.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 5:36 PM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 2018-12-08 2:38 PM, oliver johnson via Groups.Io wrote:
Hi all I for one have more scopes than i can or will ever use , but forsome strange reason i keep getting them . For me it just fixing them that i
enjoy and once fixed it goes in the pile that i have , speaking of pile i
am looking for one last tek to complete my dual beam collection, 7844 is
the last tek needed for dual beam collection, if anyone has one reasonable
please let me know, thanks and keep the hobby going .
This thread really makes me wonder how many collectors have a succession
plan for when we can't take care of them all any more.
How many have lined up a Will, or executor who will successfully be able
to rehome your collection to a museum or suitably responsible individual?
The "wife seeks to get rid of 97 of husband's instruments by Sunday,
local pickup only", that we see semi-regularly now, is far from the
worst case scenario.
Disclaimer: I haven't
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:39 PM, TomC<email@example.com> wrote: On12/7/2018 3:15 PM, Craig Sawyers wrote:
Now just what do I do if I have to display more than 12 waveforms at
Ah - you can do that with a single 7844How?