I just re-read the 7904 service manual section on testing the LVPS and the resistance given there for the +5 V point is 50 Ohms which compares well to your 47 Ohms.
Following the procedure in the SM for a LVPS in tic-tic mode should help isolate the trouble.
Bob.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 4/11/2018 8:10 AM, Robert Hay wrote: Just to re-cap, your initial message indicated your probe ground lead contacted a high voltage point on a device under test with a common ground. This would raise the scope vertical input ground and cause high current to find its way thru your scope. This apparently caused a failure in the scope.
Your resistance tests don't point to a short on any of the LV supplies. The author of the old article used a VOM so I would tend to compare VOM readings to those given in the article. If you tested using both Fluke and VOM did you find much differences in readings?
The minus 51 V load resistance is much higher than the article measurement. The plus 5 is lower resistance. So, those might be the places to look. Did you check the diodes and caps for the -51 volt supply? If they are good, you may be looking for something failed open on the mainframe side since your measurement of 31.6k with the LVPS disconnected is much higher than the 2k given in the article.
Usually, the tic-tic mode is the power supply letting you know there is a short on one of the supplies and saving itself from further damage. As far as testing it without load to see if you still get the tic-tic or not it would be good if one of the more experienced members with testing the 7904 supply jumps in here.
Bob.
On 4/10/2018 4:37 PM, JJ wrote:
In reading that doc, I'm concerned that the problem is in that inverter control chip. That's probably impossible to find. I found the schematic of what's inside it: http://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/File:155-0067-02_block.png
Z-axis Board voltages PSU in Mainframe +130 8.3k +50 3.7k +15 90.1 ohms -15 205 ohms -50 4.2k +5 47 ohms
+5V lamp 2 ohms
Z-axis Board voltages PSU out of Mainframe +130 9,9k +50 4.6k +15 92.3 ohms -15 216 ohms -50 31.6k +5 48 ohms
+5V lamp 23k
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Robert Hay <bobh@joba.com> wrote:
Ok, you said the resistances were very high, how much higher than those suggested by the article?
+130 volts 6k +50 2k +15 90 Ohms -15 100 Ohms -50 250 Ohms +5V lamp 800 Ohms
Bob.
On 4/10/2018 1:28 PM, JJ wrote:
Bob, I found that the diodes seem OK when I disconnected one lead and measured both resistance and diode forward and reverse voltage. I found that the short across those two diodes was due to a shorted capacitor on the rectifier board - I was actually measuring the winding tap resistance through a weird path. I reconnected the PSU back into the mainframe after changing the cap. There was no glory - a very low tick coming from the supply.
I'll need to continue debug by following the procedure in the that document. I measured the resistances in z-axis board as the procedure indicates while the PSU was out of the mainframe - they are pretty much in line - a couple of resistances were much higher than the table - none were lower . I'll measure them now while the power supply is in the mainframe, Also, I get different results using a VOM and a DVM. Maybe there's something wrong with my VOM - it's pretty old. Is a VOM required to get the proper measurements as indicated in the table?
.Best, John
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Robert Hay <bobh@joba.com> wrote:
They say in the article that a low resistance indicates a problem in the
mainframe which is true if you are looking at something shorting to ground. But, in your case I would not discount that high current caused a open circuit while trying to get back to the source. I suppose you already looked for any signs of burning or smoked components, leads, traces, etc.
Bob.
On 4/10/2018 7:44 AM, JJ wrote:
Yes the resistances were very high. According to that doc, the issue
should be on the PSU. I'm going to put the PSU back into the mainframe, connect the cables, and make those voltage measurements on the LV regulator board. I didn't check for voltages before taking the PSU out because I didn't know at that time that the PSU needs to be under minimum load.
I found a shorted cap C1360 on the rectifier board (+54v filter cap on output of Pi filter). I'm going to lift one lead to ensure it's the problem. I'm also going to validate that the two power diodes that I found are shorted - by disconnecting the wires going to those diodes and measuring. If the diodes are bad, I'll replace the bad 10A diodes with two 5A diodes in parallel temporarily - hoping that's OK, I'll then hook up the mainframe's cables to the PS and check the voltages. I think the 3 cables are long enough for the PSU to hang out the back. If not, I plan on making extender cables.
Best, John
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Robert Hay <bobh@joba.com> wrote:
Have you checked resistances as suggested in the Service Scope article?
And then voltages with the supply outside the scope but still connected?
Bob.
On 4/10/2018 6:38 AM, JJ wrote:
Hi Tony, So, based on your findings, you have confirmed that the the PSU
needs to be under load in order to be functional. I will check all the caps on those 3 boards as well. Thank you for the info - it's very, very helpful. I hope the experts on this forum can help you out with the remainder of your 7904's issues.
Best, John
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Yiu On Tony C via Groups.Io < tonycheung_hk=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:
Hi JJ :
I am from Hong Kong ! I just complete the repair of PSU of TEK7904 , I
am lucky , I find a SHORT E-Cap. once I replace it and turn on PSU alone , It still sound shut-down ! once I connect to main unit , it come normal . I found few E-Cap short on A9 H amp board, A2 Main interface board and A12 Rectifier board For the power diode , I did check each by de-solder the to wire only . My 7904 still have other issue , H ok but the read-out still error in units , Y are not function -- position knob no response .
RegardTony CheungAPR 10 2018
From: JJ <jajustin@gmail.com> To: TekScopes@groups.io Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7:16 PM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 7904 Mainframe damaged
Dave, I went through hundreds of files in the files section of the archive and wasn't able to identify the schematic describing the minimum loading requirements for power supplies. Tried searching, browsing, ad nauseum! No glory. Are you sure that Jerry uploaded it?
Best, John
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Dave Daniel <kc0wjn@gmail.com> wrote:
On some of the 7xxx supplies (SMPS supplies, I believe), one needs to put
a minimum load on the power supply output in order for the supply to
work.
I don't remember if that is true for the 7904 power supply.
Jerry Massengale built one of these loads. I think he uploaded a copy of the schematic to the files section back in maybe2015.
DaveD
On 4/9/2018 12:22 PM, JJ wrote:
I removed the power supply from the mainframe - it's on my bench. First,
I'll remove the wire from the diode terminal and check to see if the
diode
is actually shorted as others have suggested. I was thinking of replacing the 10A diodes with two 5A diodes in parallel that I have available in my parts bin temporarily to see if I get all the other voltages back - right now there are no voltages at the test points of the rectifier board and
the
low voltage regulator. I wouldn't think there would be that much load with the supply removed? That way I can continue to debug. Thoughts?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Jeff Urban <JURB6006@gmail.com> wrote:
Incidentally, that stuff about the mini EMP is not very likely. Nott
only
does it actually have to happen at a strength to do something, it also
needs to be oriented the right way to do something. Also I erred
about the vaporized foil on the board, it was about ½ cm., not inch.
Anyway, if you are sure about the diodes I guess you know what to do,
if
possible. It might be rough to gt everything hooked back up for a live
test
without actually assembling it. Changing the diodes right away ? You could do that. And of course watch for mounting screws that also function as
a
ground, that has tripped me up a couple of times. Since you have one + and one - diode bad, assuming you don't have a
short
to ground, I would check see if there is a short between the + and -
legs
of that supply. At this time I have no idea what those sources feed but
it
could be a series arranged push pull output to something and while both of the output devices could be shorted, the load isn't low enough
impedance,
or maybe even electrostatic, to read a short to ground. It happens.
|