Re: Deane Kidd and the Metric System
EricJ
That makes more sense. For myself, I can convert back and forth pretty easily most of the time in my head already after 20+ years of doing it daily. It's pretty easy for me to think in both measurement systems these days.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Eric Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S8.
 Original message From: "Fabio Trevisan fabio.tr3visan@... [TekScopes]" <TekScopes@...> Date: 12/15/17 8:39 AM (GMT06:00) To: TekScopes@... Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Deane Kidd and the Metric System
Guys, I think what Ian Newman meant is that you can easily do that conversion by heart, without resorting to a calculator or a piece of paper to make the full division or multiplication operation. It's a nobrainer to repeatedly double the quotient and the divisor until the divisor reaches 256, and just take note of what the quotient became to get the result directly in 10ths of mm. With an error of just 0.78%! I think it goes particularly intuitive to the ones of us who dealt more with binary logic who can tell by heart most of the smaller powers of 2 and the relation between all of them. Rgrds from Brazil, Fabio 20171215 11:28 GMT02:00 Eric J wyzkydd2358@... [TekScopes] < TekScopes@...>: Same. I was a machinist, toolmaker and welder for 20 years until I injured my back. We always used 25.4 for conversion from inch to metric and vice versa, it is correct and gives the exact conversion. Eric Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S8.  Original message From: "Barry n4buq@... [TekScopes]" <TekScopes@...> Date: 12/14/17 7:48 PM (GMT06:00) To: TekScopes@... Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Deane Kidd and the Metric System I worked in a metric shop for 10 years. I pretty much always used 25.4 as the conversion factor. 0.03937 is a rounded recriprocal of 25.4 which is technically the correct conversion factor between inches and millimeters (and easier for me to remember). Thanks, Barry  N4BUQ  Original Message  From: "Tom Jobe tomjobe@... [TekScopes]" < TekScopes@...> To: TekScopes@... Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 6:36:53 PM Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Deane Kidd and the Metric System That is a very neat trick... but consider this simple plan: For the fractional part of the dimension, divide the bottom number into the top number to get its decimal equivalent. Example (7/16" = 7 divided by 16 gives you 0.4375 inches) If there are whole inches involved in the measurement then it becomes 1.4375, 2.4375 etc. Divide the decimal inch number by .03937 and you have your millimeter equivalent. Example ( our 7/16" is 0.4375 decimal inches, we divide it by .03937 and we have our answer of 11.11125 mm. Memorizing the number .03937 solves the whole problem going either way, to or from inches and millimeters. Let's have an example of going from millimeters to inches: If you multiply 100mm by .03937 you will get it's equivalent in inches, 100 x .03937 = 3.937 inches. The number .03937 is simply how many inches are in one millimeter. This .03937 method was the common way that millimeters and inches were dealt with in shops I worked at in the US. tom jobe...

