Re: DIY TD Pulser
Not sure what exactly you have two of... 😊
I've posted some test results from two samples of the build I did following the notes from Sergey Kubushyn. The test was conducted over the noon hour on an 8 GHz digital Tektronix scope at work - didn't catch the exact model number. I posted captures of the rise time photos under "DIY TD Pulser" in the Photos section. Got 159 pS on the first build. Was a little more careful with the output construction on the second and got down to 119 pS with it. Jeff ________________________________ From: TekScopes@yahoogroups.com <TekScopes@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Chuck Harris cfharris@erols.com [TekScopes] <TekScopes@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 6:46 PM To: TekScopes@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Re: DIY TD Pulser I have two of them. One has a bad TD, the other works, but is easily 10 times slower than the spec's say it should be. I had heard that when tektronix made them they had no real way of measuring the pulse risetime, so they guessed. -Chuck Harris David davidwhess@gmail.com [TekScopes] wrote: Why can't you use the random sampling capability on the 7T11? Then at
|
|