|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I saw the grin, but hadn't looked at the pictures. ;) And forgot to attach the photo of the MT4 taper &adapter. So here goes on the photo.
And no. That doesn't look like a factory attachment to me in
I saw the grin, but hadn't looked at the pictures. ;) And forgot to attach the photo of the MT4 taper &adapter. So here goes on the photo.
And no. That doesn't look like a factory attachment to me in
|
By
Bill in OKC too
·
#106418
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Did you divide by 2?
On Thursday, June 2, 2022, 08:44:31 AM CDT, Bill in OKC too via groups.io <wmrmeyers@...> wrote:
Did you divide by 2?
On Thursday, June 2, 2022, 08:44:31 AM CDT, Bill in OKC too via groups.io <wmrmeyers@...> wrote:
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106417
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
My adapter for the Heavy 10L is 1-5/8" OD at the big end. It's .940" ID, with a wall thickness of 0.350" An MT 4 taper is 1.195" OD at that point on the taper. That gives you a wall thickness of
My adapter for the Heavy 10L is 1-5/8" OD at the big end. It's .940" ID, with a wall thickness of 0.350" An MT 4 taper is 1.195" OD at that point on the taper. That gives you a wall thickness of
|
By
Bill in OKC too
·
#106416
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Do to the varied level of users on the site, it is best to be direct and blunt or a sheep can easily be lead to slaughter. Lowering your credibility for that user/buyer in future posts.
Do to the varied level of users on the site, it is best to be direct and blunt or a sheep can easily be lead to slaughter. Lowering your credibility for that user/buyer in future posts.
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106415
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
It did not come out as a grin; just a semi colon a minus and a backslash.
Best Regards,
Andrei D. Calciu
6371 Birch Leaf Court
Burke, VA 22015-3528 USA
mailto:calciu1@...
From:
It did not come out as a grin; just a semi colon a minus and a backslash.
Best Regards,
Andrei D. Calciu
6371 Birch Leaf Court
Burke, VA 22015-3528 USA
mailto:calciu1@...
From:
|
By
Andrei
·
#106414
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I guess my little "grin" emoji was too subtle...
Just thought folks would find these ebay pictures amusing in light of this thread.
The seller got a note from me pointing out this was just some
I guess my little "grin" emoji was too subtle...
Just thought folks would find these ebay pictures amusing in light of this thread.
The seller got a note from me pointing out this was just some
|
By
E A
·
#106413
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Caveat Emptor
Umm... Look at the pictures!!! It might be the box but it is a crude home-made ball center without the ball or a piece of scrap metal. Buyer beware!!
Caveat Emptor
Umm... Look at the pictures!!! It might be the box but it is a crude home-made ball center without the ball or a piece of scrap metal. Buyer beware!!
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106412
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Your lathe has a mt3 headstock. No sleeve needed.
Get Outlook for Android
From: SouthBendLathe@groups.io <SouthBendLathe@groups.io> on behalf of E A <b-arch@...>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 8:21:11
Your lathe has a mt3 headstock. No sleeve needed.
Get Outlook for Android
From: SouthBendLathe@groups.io <SouthBendLathe@groups.io> on behalf of E A <b-arch@...>
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 8:21:11
|
By
Andrei
·
#106411
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Currently on Ebay...
Vtg South Bend Lathe Works Headstock Spindle Sleeve Catalog No. 205-N, orig box! $49.99
So what Morse Taper is this? And will it fit my 9A? ;-\
Erik A
From:
Currently on Ebay...
Vtg South Bend Lathe Works Headstock Spindle Sleeve Catalog No. 205-N, orig box! $49.99
So what Morse Taper is this? And will it fit my 9A? ;-\
Erik A
From:
|
By
E A
·
#106410
·
|
|
SB 9in. milling attachment
I'm looking for a 9in. milling attachment for my SB lathe. If anybody has a reasonably priced milling attachment please email me at dogbreath312@... with a picture if you could. Please no mills that
I'm looking for a 9in. milling attachment for my SB lathe. If anybody has a reasonably priced milling attachment please email me at dogbreath312@... with a picture if you could. Please no mills that
|
By
neafus
·
#106409
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I would check closer before making that MT4 as I think it would be a very thin sleeve and could prove it's self problematic in use and removal.
I would check closer before making that MT4 as I think it would be a very thin sleeve and could prove it's self problematic in use and removal.
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106408
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Might want to add an MT4 while you're at it. Just in case. It will be a while before I need one, but the Smithy CB-1220XL 3-in-1 machine my brother decided I needed has an MT4 spindle, MT3 tailstock,
Might want to add an MT4 while you're at it. Just in case. It will be a while before I need one, but the Smithy CB-1220XL 3-in-1 machine my brother decided I needed has an MT4 spindle, MT3 tailstock,
|
By
Bill in OKC too
·
#106407
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I have not but would say that is your call. You can also ream the finish internal taper using a Morse Taper finish taper in the tail stock. I would only do this turning the spindle by hand not
I have not but would say that is your call. You can also ream the finish internal taper using a Morse Taper finish taper in the tail stock. I would only do this turning the spindle by hand not
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106406
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
That will make it easier to hold and keep it true.
Should mark spindle and adapter in case the adapter is removed and reinstalled. Probably unnecessary since is probably true. But why not?
That will make it easier to hold and keep it true.
Should mark spindle and adapter in case the adapter is removed and reinstalled. Probably unnecessary since is probably true. But why not?
|
By
Rangelov
·
#106405
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I turn the outside and then with it installed in the spindle bore the inside. It becomes an exact fit for your lathe that way.
Good luck, glad the group provided help.
I turn the outside and then with it installed in the spindle bore the inside. It becomes an exact fit for your lathe that way.
Good luck, glad the group provided help.
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106404
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Hi,
Thanks for all the information. I think that I finally understand my lathe.
I misread the SouthBend documentation.
The .602 "proprietary" spindle bore taper is almost identical to Morse Taper #3
Hi,
Thanks for all the information. I think that I finally understand my lathe.
I misread the SouthBend documentation.
The .602 "proprietary" spindle bore taper is almost identical to Morse Taper #3
|
By
Rangelov
·
#106403
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Most South Bend used a .602 taper which is not a MT4.5. It is propitiatory and unique to SB.
On Sunday, May 29,
Most South Bend used a .602 taper which is not a MT4.5. It is propitiatory and unique to SB.
On Sunday, May 29,
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106402
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I might be thinking that South Bend was a pretty large factor in the early days of the Machinery Handbook& maybe it was included in teh book cause there were/are so many of them out
I might be thinking that South Bend was a pretty large factor in the early days of the Machinery Handbook& maybe it was included in teh book cause there were/are so many of them out
|
By
mike allen
·
#106401
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
Hi There,
I gather from the table (ASA 5.10-1953) that this table was
adopted in 1953. I would guess that it was adopted because
several machine makers during the 1950's started using this
taper
Hi There,
I gather from the table (ASA 5.10-1953) that this table was
adopted in 1953. I would guess that it was adopted because
several machine makers during the 1950's started using this
taper
|
By
wlw19958
·
#106400
·
|
|
Re: 14-1/2 spindle nose and taper
I am surprised it is listed in 1957. That is nearly 100 years after the Morse standards were created. We don't know when it showed up but seems relatively new compared to the original standards with
I am surprised it is listed in 1957. That is nearly 100 years after the Morse standards were created. We don't know when it showed up but seems relatively new compared to the original standards with
|
By
rlm_mcv
·
#106399
·
|