|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
Nelson Collar
A lot of lathes did not come with covers and the era of that machine it could be older.
On Wednesday, November 6, 2019, 09:19:38 AM CST, vtsblogan@... <vtsblogan@...> wrote:
Can't tell from the pics, but it probably takes the long plastic one that covers both set of pulleys- if it's a rear drive one.
I'm sure you can find a pic of it. I've seen them on Ebay in the 75 to 150 range If you can confirm it I have a spare you can have if you don't mind waiting till late winter spring. On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:49:31 -0800, "Nitro" <nitroburners@...> wrote: Hi guys and gals Winter is approaching and I hope to have the time to reassemble my 10K. This machine didn't come with the belt/gear guard in place when I acquired it. The headstock casting is not the same as a 9" and is not the same as the underdrive units I have seen online. This lathe was bench mounted when I found it, but had no guard in place at the time. The machine was disassembled for refinishing as it had been in a fire, but didn't get hot enough to destroy it. I probably have 200 hours or more invested in it for the teardown, disassembly and refinishing. I used my glass bead cabinet for a lot of the cleaning, plus have my Logan 922 11 inch for some of the round polishing work. I'm retired now with over 50 years on the shop floor, so hopefully my work does speak for itself. Can anyone help me identify it so I can track one down? My rebuild manual was of no help, so even a picture or so of an existing one would be helpful.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
vtsblogan@...
Can't tell from the pics, but it probably takes the long plastic one that covers both set of pulleys- if it's a rear drive one. I'm sure you can find a pic of it. I've seen them on Ebay in the 75 to 150 range If you can confirm it I have a spare you can have if you don't mind waiting till late winter spring.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:49:31 -0800, "Nitro" <nitroburners@...> wrote:
Hi guys and gals Winter is approaching and I hope to have the time to reassemble my 10K. This machine didn't come with the belt/gear guard in place when I acquired it. The headstock casting is not the same as a 9" and is not the same as the underdrive units I have seen online. This lathe was bench mounted when I found it, but had no guard in place at the time. The machine was disassembled for refinishing as it had been in a fire, but didn't get hot enough to destroy it. I probably have 200 hours or more invested in it for the teardown, disassembly and refinishing. I used my glass bead cabinet for a lot of the cleaning, plus have my Logan 922 11 inch for some of the round polishing work. I'm retired now with over 50 years on the shop floor, so hopefully my work does speak for itself. Can anyone help me identify it so I can track one down? My rebuild manual was of no help, so even a picture or so of an existing one would be helpful.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
Phillip Rankin
The photos here can at least help you identify what you what you are looking for. The top cover comes up on ebay from time to time, but I haven't noticed one lately. http://www.lathes.co.uk/southbend/page8.html
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 7:22 AM Steven H via Groups.Io <stevesmachining=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
You might be able to find parts diagram(s) or photos that will help at the www.wswells.com site. Other sites to check are www.vintagemachinery.org
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Good luck. Steve Haskell
On Nov 5, 2019, at 12:49 PM, Nitro <nitroburners@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
Correct, my casting is closed on the bottom and doesn't have the hinge/mounting bosses present in an underdrive unit.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
Rogan Creswick
Ah, looking at your pictures again, you must have a rear-mount drive (It looks like the bottom of the headstock is visible, and that would certainly be different, if that's what I think it is.). I don't think I can help, but let me know.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 7:29 PM Rogan Creswick via Groups.Io <creswick=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 1964 10K headstock cover question
Rogan Creswick
I am also in the process of restoring a 10k that went through a fire...you've accomplished a lot more than I have! I do have the guards, for mine, and I can post pictures if that's useful. I'm unsure from your message: *is* your lathe an underdrive unit? Mine is -- which will probably make a bit of a difference here.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:49 AM Nitro <nitroburners@...> wrote: Hi guys and gals
|
||
|
|
||
|
1964 10K headstock cover question
Hi guys and gals
Winter is approaching and I hope to have the time to reassemble my 10K. This machine didn't come with the belt/gear guard in place when I acquired it. The headstock casting is not the same as a 9" and is not the same as the underdrive units I have seen online. This lathe was bench mounted when I found it, but had no guard in place at the time. The machine was disassembled for refinishing as it had been in a fire, but didn't get hot enough to destroy it. I probably have 200 hours or more invested in it for the teardown, disassembly and refinishing. I used my glass bead cabinet for a lot of the cleaning, plus have my Logan 922 11 inch for some of the round polishing work. I'm retired now with over 50 years on the shop floor, so hopefully my work does speak for itself. Can anyone help me identify it so I can track one down? My rebuild manual was of no help, so even a picture or so of an existing one would be helpful.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
Chuck Lippmeier
Thanks all for your responses. It’s too bad this article is so confusing. I’m thinking now that it would be easier to just put an adjustable speed power feed on the compound and eliminate the whole problem. Chuck Lippmeier
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
On the 9" with factory taper attachment, the connecting bar is integral to the cross slide.
John
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
South Bend calls the 'Cross-Feed Tailpiece' the 'connecting bar'. It's this part (at least on a 13"):
John
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
Looking at the article, the author calls it the “Cross-Feed Tailpiece” in the Bill of Materials on Page 50 of the article. This is Detail 8. Then in the upper LH corner of Page 52, the drawing for Detail 8 is shown and the detail is called the “Cross-Slide Tailpiece”. So an error in editing. Drawing calls for a piece of cold rolled steel, 1/4” x 3-1/8” x 10-1/2”. I think I would use 3” wide material myself.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Steve Haskell
On Nov 4, 2019, at 6:31 PM, StevesMachining <stevesmachining@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
Jim B. I would say:
-- Jim B
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
I assume by the name it is the detail that gets bolted on the rear end of the upper cross slide (that would be the piece that the compound sits on)- the cross-slide tailpiece has a long slot down the center of it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Steve Haskell
On Nov 4, 2019, at 5:37 PM, Chuck Lippmeier <chuck@...> wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
Chuck Lippmeier
Group, I bought the eBay post for the “Home Shop Machinist” 2004 Jan/Feb. edition. As I read, it refers to a “Cross-feed tailpiece” What is a “cross-slide tailpiece”? Chuck Lippmeier
From: SouthBendLathe@groups.io [mailto:SouthBendLathe@groups.io] On Behalf Of mike allen
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 9:22 PM To: SouthBendLathe@groups.io Subject: Re: [SouthBendLathe] 9" Taper attachment plans
Steve , I ended up with a copy from another member , but thank you very much animal On 10/30/2019 9:57 AM, Steven H via Groups.Io wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
MAKING A TAPER ATT
william B. Mispel
Hi. I don't know who is building the taper att. but I do have three castings he may be interested in them. I rebuilt my factory taper att. into a teliscoping taper att. several years ago. Kept the parts I wanted to use. Kept the rest in a box.(pack rat) Bruce
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
william B. Mispel
I don't know who is building the taper att.But, I have three castings he may be interested in. I rebuilt my taper att. From a factory att to a telescopic att. a few years ago. Pretty much from scratch using just the parts I wanted. Bruce
On 10/31/2019 9:22 PM, mike allen
wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
william B. Mispel
HI, Whoever is building the taper att. I have three main castings you may like to have. I rebuilt my taper att. a few years ago into a teliscoping att. Bruce
On 10/31/2019 9:22 PM, mike allen
wrote:
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
mike allen
Steve , I ended up with a copy from another member , but thank you very much animal
On 10/30/2019 9:57 AM, Steven H via
Groups.Io wrote:
Mike,
|
||
|
|
||
|
Re: 9" Taper attachment plans
Guenther Paul
His full name is George Bullis GP
On Thursday, October 31, 2019, 5:41:52 PM EDT, Steven H via Groups.Io <stevesmachining@...> wrote:
Original poster stated in his original post that the particular HSM back issue was no longer available.
Rules are made to be broken, people cheat on their income taxes all the time, still wrong, but they do it anyway.
Regards,
Steven R. Haskell
-----Original Message-----
From: John Dammeyer <johnd@...> To: SouthBendLathe <SouthBendLathe@groups.io> Sent: Thu, Oct 31, 2019 4:51 pm Subject: Re: [SouthBendLathe] 9" Taper attachment plans Has anyone actually contacted Home Shop Machinist and asked about purchasing either a PDF or a back issue? As long as they would be willing to provide it, copying it and sending it to someone is still wrong.
John
From: SouthBendLathe@groups.io [mailto:SouthBendLathe@groups.io] On Behalf Of comstock_friend
Sent: October-31-19 1:23 PM To: SouthBendLathe@groups.io Subject: Re: [SouthBendLathe] 9" Taper attachment plans Yes, the Home Shop Machinist article would have a very active copyright! I have scanned it, but file is 18MB (I guess I could do it again at lower resolution). PM me and I can send it. My Canon 9000 scanner will keep all the pdf pages in one doc. Free pdfill http://www.pdfill.com/pdf_tools_free.html will also do the same....
John
|
||
|
|
