Homemade friction drive ideas? #ascom #question
Hi. Thanks! |
|
Don W
Hi Matija,
Friction drives must have similar tics/rev to worm/gear drives, which means for SiTech you need around (or more) 10 million tics/revolution for good tracking (for imaging). SiTech servos are (were, since they are no longer available) 10:1 gear ratio times 2000 encoder tics/rev. Those numbers with 360:1 worm gear ratio = 7.2 million (not quite enough). OK, now consider a friction drive with a disk driven by a servo driven pin, with the pin rolling on the edge of a disk. If the disk is 360 mm diameter, to get 360:1 means the pin has to be 1 mm diameter. No way is that going to work! So consider a pin about 8 mm diameter, that would give the friction drive 360/8 = 45:1 ratio, needing 8:1 gearing between the servo (10:1) just to get to 7.2 million tics/rev. Now the real problem with friction drives: selection of materials for the disk and pin drive. The most successful friction drive mounts are the Mesu mounts. The earliest ones had a problem: after extended operation (a lot of use) the friction surfaces deteriorated leaving a powder of metal debris on the surface that made the drive rough and noisey. Mr Mesu changed the type of metals used to eliminate the problem. I don't know what metals he uses today. Stainless steels are known to gall easily. Steels rust. Aluminum is generally too soft. Titanium is expensive and difficult to work with. So I don't know. Don W |
|
SIMON
For size of wheel the answer has to be a large as possible, it's possible mesu includes this in his specs so have a route around his site, but I'd say it was about 10" diameter, (I can't measure as it is enclosed on a stainless steel case)
Material:Mesu uses stainless steel
|
|
Hi Don. |
|
Hi.
I plan to make a two stage system just like in your mesu mount. My main disk can only be 8” due to physical limitations. If I can get my hands on a decent 1:100 harmonic drive to attach to my motor, my final gear ratio will be 1:12500. That would get me (20000tics/rev * 12500) 250.000.000 tics per rotation of the main disk. I will indeed use stainless steel for my disks. I will polish all of them very well and maybe harden the thinest ones. Here is a sketch of what it will look like: Thanks! Matija |
|
Don W
Hi Matija,
Be careful with designing your tics/rev. SiTech can work well with 10 million to 30 million tics per rev. But 250 million tics won't work at all - WAY TOO MANY! Don W |
|
Hi, Don.
Thanks for informing me. I redesigned my friction system so that there is only a harmonic drive(1:50), roller pin, and the main disk(1:25), That gives me a ratio of 1:1250 or 25.000.000 tics/rev. That should work. I do worry about slippage though.
Again thanks for the information.
Matija |
|
Don W
Hi Matija,
Yes 25 million tics should work fine. I have been using 29 million tics on my SiTech since 2008 with about 1.67 degrees per scond slew speed. Not fast, but I spend most of my time tracking, not on GoTo's. Friction drives always have a concern for slippage. Just balance the scope and cameras very well. Then the main condition for slippage will be acceleration and deceleration. Fortunately SiTech has a control in ServoConfig to reduce accereation if you do get slippage. Not all mount controllers have this capability. Don W |
|
Hi Don. Do you by any chance know when will the motors be available in your online store? |
|
Don W
Hi Matija,
There are many types of stainless steels, ssum are gummy to machine and others are great to machine (cut with lathe or mill). Generally I believe using the same alloy stainless for mating parts is very likely to gall (tear the surface, ruining the assembly). Polishing doesn't prevent galling. You need to contact a metallurgist to recommend which alloys may work. Don W |
|
Roland
Don, You’re quite right. The best combination is probably some form of steel (certain types of stainless and other steels) and B14 bronze. In a worm and crown setup the crown is normally bronze and the worm is steel. B14 is actually quite self lubricating and is easy to machine precisely. Many mounts (eg AP) use aluminium crowns which can be anodised to increase surface hardness but I’m not convinced about the long term wear. But certainly using the same metal for mating parts may be problematic. Roland On 19 Nov 2022, at 03:56, Don W <westergren@...> wrote:
Hi Matija, There are many types of stainless steels, ssum are gummy to machine and others are great to machine (cut with lathe or mill). Generally I believe using the same alloy stainless for mating parts is very likely to gall (tear the surface, ruining the assembly). Polishing doesn't prevent galling. You need to contact a metallurgist to recommend which alloys may work. Don W |
|
Mark Volle
I’m not a metallurgist but I did try a friction drive with stainless on stainless and it wasn’t good -
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Surprisingly it was also a problem with an anodized disk - the anodized surface is almost too hard and too abrasive but an anodized pinion was able to drive almost any other metal - challenge being that if it slips, it grinds into the other material very quickly but the apparently rougher and harder surface of the anodized 6061 drive pin grabbed really well I’m somewhat spoiled as I managed to get several worm and gear sets and stopped trying the friction drive - I did end up using servo motors with harmonic drives to turn the worms - which has seemed to work well - Mark
|
|
Hi Mark. Also I really cant figure out what to use for the main disk. Maybe bronze like it was recommended earlier? One of the many stainless steels? I would imagine, that the 6061 pinion will be hard enough to not have any surface denting with all the pressure being put on it. |
|
Thanks!
We have an experienced metallurgist at my high school. I hope he can help the find the disk material. One user recommended I use 6061 anodised aluminium for the pinion. What do you think? Thanks again, Matija |
|
Mark Volle
Matija,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I found that the anodized surface was very “grippy” against stainless and plain steel but an anodized part isn’t necessarily the most perfectly uniform or round as the anodizing “grows” the surface - which if grown thick enough could then be ground to a precision finish and diameter afterwards but it is essentially a very hard surface on a relatively soft material. Thicker disks increase the amount of surface contact between the parts which can lower the tension needed or increase the load for the same tension but ultimately the tension between the two parts will be a big part of how suitable a specific material is - Ground and polished tool steel dowel pins are readily available and might make good pinions - and are available in very hard materials and precisely ground - they would have very little flex Some of this really depends on your performance targets - how perfect do you want the result to be? “”Perfect” is extremely challenging while “really good” is much more forgiving - Mark
|
|
Roland
Mark, I pretty much agree with your thoughts. An additional problem with anodising is that if, for some reason, you get a hard particle on the wheel, you run the risk of breaking through the anodising and then you only have the soft metal underneath. At most, anodising is maybe a few hundred microns thick, as far as I can recall. Matija, One other option is to make sure that one part wears more quickly than the other and can be replaced on a regular basis. So you need to make it so that it is easily accessible. You need to find a compromise between the coefficient of friction, the force applied and the precision you require. Bear in mind that anodising (and chroming) increase surface hardness but reduce the coefficient of friction. I am by no means an expert but certainly the choice of materials is fundamental. Of course, providing you can construct a system which will allow it fairly easily, you can also experiment with different materials. If I had to make a call on it, I would go for bronze against steel. If you harden the steel, the bronze will wear out over time and you’ll need to replace it from time to time. You can have both precisely ground so that the dimensions are uniform. You could also turn and then lap but I think the ground option is better. But I’m sure there are other choices possible. Hope this helps. Roland. On 19 Nov 2022, at 10:07, Mark Volle <mark.d.volle@...> wrote:
Matija, I found that the anodized surface was very “grippy” against stainless and plain steel but an anodized part isn’t necessarily the most perfectly uniform or round as the anodizing “grows” the surface - which if grown thick enough could then be ground to a precision finish and diameter afterwards but it is essentially a very hard surface on a relatively soft material. Thicker disks increase the amount of surface contact between the parts which can lower the tension needed or increase the load for the same tension but ultimately the tension between the two parts will be a big part of how suitable a specific material is - Ground and polished tool steel dowel pins are readily available and might make good pinions - and are available in very hard materials and precisely ground - they would have very little flex Some of this really depends on your performance targets - how perfect do you want the result to be? “”Perfect” is extremely challenging while “really good” is much more forgiving - Mark
|
|
Ronald, I still cant even remotely figure out how much force will have to be pushing on the pinion for the mount to drive nicely. My mount head will weigh about 40-60kg(without CW) and my telescope will be 25kg MAX. Most likely closer to 15kg. So lets say I make a D=10mm pinion out of steel and a D=250mm disk from bronze, about how much force are we talking here? 500N? 1000N? I will attach a photo of the tension system. |
|
Hi Mark, |
|
Roland
Most of the periodic error will probably come from the pinion if it is slightly out of round. That’s why I’m suggesting you precision grind and harden it. Of course, you may be able to go with off-the-shelf pinions. 10mm would seem ok to start. However, of what will you make the pressure wheel? This aside, over time a bronze disk will wear if the pinion is hardened. To avoid making a large bronze disk, you could think about using an annulus which fits precisely on a disk which you could make of another material. That way you only need to change the outer annulus. You could even experiment with different materials fairly easily. Just make the annulus out if a different material and slip it onto the main disk and fix it in position. In terms of the pressure, I have no idea. Much will depend on how well balanced you are and what friction you need to overcome. R. On 19 Nov 2022, at 13:05, Matija Sircelj <matija.sircelj@...> wrote:
Ronald, I still cant even remotely figure out how much force will have to be pushing on the pinion for the mount to drive nicely. My mount head will weigh about 40-60kg(without CW) and my telescope will be 25kg MAX. Most likely closer to 15kg. So lets say I make a D=10mm pinion out of steel and a D=250mm disk from bronze, about how much force are we talking here? 500N? 1000N? I will attach a photo of the tension system. |
|
Mark Volle
Matija,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would strongly recommend supporting the pinion with bearings on both sides of the disk - even with precision worm drives, having bearings on both sides of the pressure point is a huge improvement. Using a spring loaded pressure roller rather than or even in conjunction with a tensioned pinion mount should be really useful. The “spring” can also be a metal arm with “flex” in it that is tensioned down by an adjusting screw - the spring travel will be very small but the forces may need to be considerable so something that we would normally think of as more rigid can actually make a nicely controlled spring. Mark
|
|