|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi Maxime,
Please try the PIDs settings that Dan suggested. They might be able to smooth out the RA motion. Use the ServoConfig.exe utility to adjust the PIDs and check for RA motion. Do this
Hi Maxime,
Please try the PIDs settings that Dan suggested. They might be able to smooth out the RA motion. Use the ServoConfig.exe utility to adjust the PIDs and check for RA motion. Do this
|
By
Don W
·
#31557
·
|
|
Re: 32 in in St. Charles, Missouri
Hi Jim, glad to hear you are making some progress with the scope.
How are the skies at the location?
Perhaps I'm wrong and I've never personally tried this, but I seriously doubt you will be able to
Hi Jim, glad to hear you are making some progress with the scope.
How are the skies at the location?
Perhaps I'm wrong and I've never personally tried this, but I seriously doubt you will be able to
|
By
Joshua Hufford
·
#31556
·
|
|
32 in in St. Charles, Missouri
Some of you may remember when this saga began some dozen years ago when the Astronomical Society of Eastern Missouri acquired a 32" telescope then owned by Al Kelly in Houston. We had worked out a
Some of you may remember when this saga began some dozen years ago when the Astronomical Society of Eastern Missouri acquired a 32" telescope then owned by Al Kelly in Houston. We had worked out a
|
By
James Roe
·
#31555
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Did you try my suggestion of lowering the integral and raising the derivative?
Dan
Did you try my suggestion of lowering the integral and raising the derivative?
Dan
|
By
Dan Gray
·
#31554
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
I can't help with the oscillation, but I wanted to mention that 12595200 is the correct number for ticks/rev (31488 * 400x interpolation = 12595200). I'm a little bit surprised that your Al ticks per
I can't help with the oscillation, but I wanted to mention that 12595200 is the correct number for ticks/rev (31488 * 400x interpolation = 12595200). I'm a little bit surprised that your Al ticks per
|
By
jan@...
·
#31553
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi Maxime,
OK, your test with IGNORE means the mount encoders have NOTHING to do with your oscillation. Your description of error and current on RA says the servo is heavily loaded, which you also
Hi Maxime,
OK, your test with IGNORE means the mount encoders have NOTHING to do with your oscillation. Your description of error and current on RA says the servo is heavily loaded, which you also
|
By
Don W
·
#31552
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi all,
So I went to the observatory yesterday.
The shaking was discrete but the mount was still not behaving well. It was blocked again while pointing low toward West.
The shaking was present in
Hi all,
So I went to the observatory yesterday.
The shaking was discrete but the mount was still not behaving well. It was blocked again while pointing low toward West.
The shaking was present in
|
By
Maxime Spano
·
#31551
·
|
|
Re: PointXP Generation with Plate Solving: Where are the scripts
Yes, that is in the back of my mind, but first I have to be successful on the script part. Then I will look at see if I can automatize the camera.
Thanks for the reminder.
Yes, that is in the back of my mind, but first I have to be successful on the script part. Then I will look at see if I can automatize the camera.
Thanks for the reminder.
|
By
Alvaro Cruz-Cabrera
·
#31550
·
|
|
Re: PointXP Generation with Plate Solving: Where are the scripts
Don,
Thanks for the information. Hopefully I will manage to get it right. Now I have to wait for the full moon to take advantage of it (I am imaging in between).
Alvaro
Don,
Thanks for the information. Hopefully I will manage to get it right. Now I have to wait for the full moon to take advantage of it (I am imaging in between).
Alvaro
|
By
Alvaro Cruz-Cabrera
·
#31549
·
|
|
Re: PointXP Generation with Plate Solving: Where are the scripts
Hi,
You could find ASCOM driver for Sony here : https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/678666-ascom-driver-for-sony-cameras-available-for-testing/
or here :
Hi,
You could find ASCOM driver for Sony here : https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/678666-ascom-driver-for-sony-cameras-available-for-testing/
or here :
|
By
Salomon Thomas
·
#31548
·
|
|
Re: PointXP Generation with Plate Solving: Where are the scripts
Hi Alvaro,
When you set up SiTech to do a PXP rmodel, SiTech creates a script to do the PXP model. That script is listed in the script window where you set up the PXP model (where you tell it how
Hi Alvaro,
When you set up SiTech to do a PXP rmodel, SiTech creates a script to do the PXP model. That script is listed in the script window where you set up the PXP model (where you tell it how
|
By
Don W
·
#31547
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi Maxime,
My suggestion about the worm/gear fit and grease is based on your description of having to release the fit a bit to be able to move the mount away from viewing Venus at low altitude. You
Hi Maxime,
My suggestion about the worm/gear fit and grease is based on your description of having to release the fit a bit to be able to move the mount away from viewing Venus at low altitude. You
|
By
Don W
·
#31546
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi,
Thanks for your answers.
Don, the shaking was difficult to identify as it was not present all the time and not every night (it just shake for 4 or 5 sec then it's ok for 30s). It's just that some
Hi,
Thanks for your answers.
Don, the shaking was difficult to identify as it was not present all the time and not every night (it just shake for 4 or 5 sec then it's ok for 30s). It's just that some
|
By
Maxime Spano
·
#31545
·
|
|
PointXP Generation with Plate Solving: Where are the scripts
Dan,
We kind of talk a while ago about using the script that collects the PointXP by using plate solving.
I mentioned that I use a Sony A7s, and that there is not ASCOM access to the camera, so I
Dan,
We kind of talk a while ago about using the script that collects the PointXP by using plate solving.
I mentioned that I use a Sony A7s, and that there is not ASCOM access to the camera, so I
|
By
Alvaro Cruz-Cabrera
·
#31544
·
|
|
Re: PointXP Analysis explained
Hi Ralf,
Sensitivity is basically an indicator to see how much data the terms have to work with. Set the limit to 20,000, the turn on all terms. This will allow PXP to turn on terms it normally
Hi Ralf,
Sensitivity is basically an indicator to see how much data the terms have to work with. Set the limit to 20,000, the turn on all terms. This will allow PXP to turn on terms it normally
|
By
Dan Gray
·
#31543
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
That setup works out to 0.1 arcseconds per tick. RGH20H is 50nm per tick. The RESR20 31488 ring is 200mm in diameter. 50nm / 100mm = 0.5 microradians = 0.1 arcseconds.
Jan
That setup works out to 0.1 arcseconds per tick. RGH20H is 50nm per tick. The RESR20 31488 ring is 200mm in diameter. 50nm / 100mm = 0.5 microradians = 0.1 arcseconds.
Jan
|
By
jan@...
·
#31542
·
|
|
PointXP Analysis explained
Hello experts,
pointxp works great, gives a lot of details, but I have no idea what all the analysis tells me.
E.g. what does "Sensitivity mean" (I have 280)
Pointing error RMS 12,8" (for a completely
Hello experts,
pointxp works great, gives a lot of details, but I have no idea what all the analysis tells me.
E.g. what does "Sensitivity mean" (I have 280)
Pointing error RMS 12,8" (for a completely
|
By
Ralf
·
#31541
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Go to the controller stuff, and take a look at the position error. You have to move your mouse to the textbox.
If you have a lot of position error, you could try lowering the integral, and raising
Go to the controller stuff, and take a look at the position error. You have to move your mouse to the textbox.
If you have a lot of position error, you could try lowering the integral, and raising
|
By
Dan Gray
·
#31540
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi Maxime,
OK, I see that you posted questions last December and didn't seem to have the shaking, so the shaking is recent. I am going to guess that the shaking in RA is too tight a fit of the worm
Hi Maxime,
OK, I see that you posted questions last December and didn't seem to have the shaking, so the shaking is recent. I am going to guess that the shaking in RA is too tight a fit of the worm
|
By
Don W
·
#31539
·
|
|
Re: Mount "shaking"
Hi Don,
Thank you very much for your post. Before I answer your questions I would like to mention two points:
- I took over the activity of the observatory while the telescope plus mount was already
Hi Don,
Thank you very much for your post. Before I answer your questions I would like to mention two points:
- I took over the activity of the observatory while the telescope plus mount was already
|
By
Maxime Spano
·
#31538
·
|