I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
|
|
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away....
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via groups.io <bill41@...> wrote: I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
|
|
The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away.... On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via groups.io I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
|
|
Nathan Rich <thaddeusthudpucker@...>
Might be possible to 3D print you something but it would be a dummy. Do you do a lot of facing point switch moves?
Nathan Rich
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away.... On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via groups.io I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
|
|
Someone was producing and testing 3D printed long shank comparable couplers but I have lost that link. Yes. I have thought about the idea of 3D printing but my CAD capabilities/knowledge are minimal. Non-Existent is a better word.
The layout is a switching layout masquerading as a branch line. The mix between facing point and trailing point switch moves on the sharp end of the loco is about 50/50.
I pulled the loco off the shelf yesterday and intend to do a study of the issues that are effecting the mismatched coupler height this weekend.
Cheers, — Bill
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Might be possible to 3D print you something but it would be a dummy. Do you do a lot of facing point switch moves?
Nathan Rich The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away.... On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via groups.io I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers, Bill Keene Irvine, CA
|
|
Visit my page for more info
Thanks
Chris
Sent from my Apple propaganda device.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: SergentEngineering@groups.io <SergentEngineering@groups.io> on behalf of Bill Keene via groups.io <bill41@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2022 7:37:48 PM
To: SergentEngineering@groups.io <SergentEngineering@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Sergent Engineering] INSTALLATION ON BLI ATSF 2-8-2 FRONT PILOT
Someone was producing and testing 3D printed long shank comparable couplers but I have lost that link. Yes. I have thought about the idea of 3D printing but my CAD capabilities/knowledge
are minimal. Non-Existent is a better word.
The layout is a switching layout masquerading as a branch line. The mix between facing point and trailing point switch moves on the sharp end of the loco is about 50/50.
I pulled the loco off the shelf yesterday and intend to do a study of the issues that are effecting the mismatched coupler height this weekend.
Cheers,
— Bill
Might be possible to 3D print you something but it would be a dummy. Do you do a lot of facing point switch moves?
Nathan Rich
The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away....
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via
groups.io
I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone
on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
|
|
Nathan Rich <thaddeusthudpucker@...>
Investment cast couplers: Nice to see someone doing this! The balls are easy to get from Amazon or similar, a package of 1500 1mm balls is $7.49 at last check. Used these to assemble a bunch of "Genuine" couplers and they work perfectly.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I’m
well along with the process of picking up with the couplers. These are test 3D prints. Next will be investment castings. Stay tuned!
Visit my page for more info
Thanks
Chris
Sent from my Apple propaganda device.
Someone was producing and testing 3D printed long shank comparable couplers but I have lost that link. Yes. I have thought about the idea of 3D printing but my CAD capabilities/knowledge
are minimal. Non-Existent is a better word.
The layout is a switching layout masquerading as a branch line. The mix between facing point and trailing point switch moves on the sharp end of the loco is about 50/50.
I pulled the loco off the shelf yesterday and intend to do a study of the issues that are effecting the mismatched coupler height this weekend.
Cheers,
— Bill
Might be possible to 3D print you something but it would be a dummy. Do you do a lot of facing point switch moves?
Nathan Rich
The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away....
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via
groups.io
I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone
on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
|
|
Nathan, thanks for the great info.
Chris
Sent from my Apple propaganda device.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: SergentEngineering@groups.io <SergentEngineering@groups.io> on behalf of Nathan Rich <thaddeusthudpucker@...>
Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2022 9:16:33 PM
To: SergentEngineering@groups.io <SergentEngineering@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Sergent Engineering] INSTALLATION ON BLI ATSF 2-8-2 FRONT PILOT
Investment cast couplers: Nice to see someone doing this! The balls are easy to get from Amazon or similar, a package of 1500 1mm balls is $7.49 at last check. Used these to assemble a bunch of "Genuine" couplers and they work perfectly.
I’m
well along with the process of picking up with the couplers. These are test 3D prints. Next will be investment castings. Stay tuned!
Visit my page for more info
Thanks
Chris
Sent from my Apple propaganda device.
Someone was producing and testing 3D printed long shank comparable couplers but I have lost that link. Yes. I have thought about the idea of 3D printing but my CAD capabilities/knowledge are minimal.
Non-Existent is a better word.
The layout is a switching layout masquerading as a branch line. The mix between facing point and trailing point switch moves on the sharp end of the loco is about 50/50.
I pulled the loco off the shelf yesterday and intend to do a study of the issues that are effecting the mismatched coupler height this weekend.
Cheers,
— Bill
Might be possible to 3D print you something but it would be a dummy. Do you do a lot of facing point switch moves?
Nathan Rich
The coupler head is barely outside the coupler box and there is interference between the coupler head and the boiler tubes on the “switcher pilot”.
The coupler is close to half a head height low. Roughly the thickness of the coupler shank.
Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
How much too short Bill? Are you talking 1/8 th inch, less, more?
I can't recall what I did to my BLI 2-8-2 and it's packed away....
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:36, Bill Keene via
groups.io
I am in the process of converting my newly acquired Broadway Limited ATSF 2-8-2 to Sergent couplers and have run into a challenge.
When simply replacing the factory coupler the standard E87 coupler is too short and also mounts too low. I do not have the longer shank couplers in my supply. I believe that a longer shank is required but the low mounting height is still an issue. Has anyone
on the list made this conversion? If so, I would greatly appreciate learning what was required to result in a successful conversion.
Thanks & Cheers,
Bill Keene
Irvine, CA
|
|