Re: Remote Decoupling

Andy Reichert

Does Nitinol have a limited working life?


On 3/7/2021 8:19 AM, George Hofmann wrote:
Wow! Now you're talking!
I was going to suggest the Nitinol wire as an actuator solution. Nice to see that you are ahead of me on that.
Regarding the air hose connection I was thinking that the metal coupler would be adequate. It of course requires that a wire be connected to it somehow which is a little issue. There is the possibility of combining the two connection ideas such that a return circuit is available. This would negate track pickups in each car which is huge.
Also since I published this idea I realized that a simple pulse train could be improved on. Instead send a train of pulses synchronized with the DCC signal as a multibit message containing a header, a byte representing the car count, followed by a CRC. This could be sent many times for redundancy.
Processing in each car could be handled by a small microcontroller such as an ATtiny85.
The idea of triggering sounds from the cars is brilliant! Hearing a coupling sound coming from the loco when the actual action was 5 cars back forced me to turn off the sound.
Pretty sure you are on the right track so to speak. Carry on.

Edgewood WA
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

Join to automatically receive all group messages.