|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
The ISP indicated no port 25 blocking, but who knows? This has turned out to be a real stumper.
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
Jonathan Magee
Hi, when trying to use the ampr.org address I think the connection will be routed over the internet. Some ISPs block connections to port 25 on unknown machines to reduce spam. 73 de Jonathan GI7KMC
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, 02:05 Don - W9JUN, <radio.w9jun@...> wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:31 AM, David Ranch wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
I have the opendns servers in my router...will that affect the resolv.conf
search ampr.org
nameserver 44.88.0.1
nameserver 44.88.0.9
nameserver 8.8.4.4
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:31 AM, David Ranch wrote:
It's still strange your smartphone can successfully connect to your Rpi via IP address but doesn't work via DNS name. Per my previous emails, please try connecting to all of the TCP ports from your phone to your Raspberry Pi:From the cell local lan (192.168.1.8) I can connect to 110 and 465 using w9jun.ampr.org and 25, 110, 465 using 192.168.1.43 (local ip of PI)
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
- What is in your Raspberry PI's /etc/resolv.conf?
search ampr.org
nameserver 44.88.0.1
nameserver 44.88.0.9
nameserver 8.8.4.4
- What is the wifi IP address of your smartphone? 192.168.1.8 - On the Raspberry Pi, if you do a "dig" on that smartphone IP address, what is it's response? dig 192.168.1.8 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Raspbian <<>> 192.168.1.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 1559
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;192.168.1.8. IN A
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
. 3600 IN SOA a.root-servers.net. nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2019062101 1800 900 604800 86400
;; Query time: 70 msec
;; SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222)
;; WHEN: Fri Jun 21 20:53:33 EDT 2019
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 115
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
David Ranch <dranch@...>
Hello Don, Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
Ok, the key detail here is when netstat shows a local address of "0.0.0.0:something", that means it's listening on all interfaces. If it's not listening on all interfaces, it would show something like "127.0.0.1:465" or "192.168.0.22:465". cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward Ok, you have forwarding on. Ok.
You don't to be masquerading (NATing) your traffic here which is ok. Overall, I don't see anything glaring there. It's still strange your smartphone can successfully connect to your Rpi via IP address but doesn't work via DNS name. Per my previous emails, please try connecting to all of the TCP ports from your phone to your Raspberry Pi: port 25 port 110 port 465 and specifically note if you get a connection or not like how I gave in my previous email. If this is a DNS issue, I have a few ideas to look at things: - What is in your Raspberry PI's /etc/resolv.conf? - What is the wifi IP address of your smartphone? - On the Raspberry Pi, if you do a "dig" on that smartphone IP address, what is it's response? --David
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
bbillp
For an internet IP DNS connection to your local server see no-ip.com . Read their information, it worked for my special control server. Bill acj
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Thanks Richard for your detailed explanation! This is looking really interesting and I might tackle that project too.
I'm looking into the other comments on this thread and see other interesting ideas too. DRAWS is a little too much for me now, but I have already a product from NW and they seem to make good stuff. Thanks again 73 from PY2BIL
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
Perry Ogletree
That’s a form of loop back protection. It helps keep nasties out of your network.
Perry K4PWO
From: RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio@groups.io <RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio@groups.io> On Behalf Of William Kimber
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 05:20 PM To: RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio@groups.io Subject: Re: [RaspberryPi-4-HamRadio] Web Server Using Postfix #networking
Hi all,
If I can stick a very rusty oar in here. Many years ago I had a PC running as a server, open to internet via router. All on wired lan. On that server from inside the lan it was not possible to use the Internet IP address. From inside the lan you had to use the internal server IP address.
The reason I believe is that the server doesn't know or use the internet address, that is done by the router which translates requests from internet to local lan address. It doesn't sent requests for the local server using the internet address from the local lan/wifi out to the internent and expect to get it echoed back.
Please forgive if I have misunderstood the problem.
Cheers, Will ZL1TAO
On 21/06/19 9:02 AM, Don - W9JUN wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
William Kimber
Hi all,
If I can stick a very rusty oar in here. Many years ago I had a
PC running as a server, open to internet via router. All on wired
lan. On that server from inside the lan it was not possible to use the Internet IP address. From inside the lan you had to use the internal server IP address.
The reason I believe is that the server doesn't know or use the
internet address, that is done by the router which translates
requests from internet to local lan address. It doesn't sent
requests for the local server using the internet address from the
local lan/wifi out to the internent and expect to get it echoed
back.
Please forgive if I have misunderstood the problem.
Cheers, Will ZL1TAO
On 21/06/19 9:02 AM, Don - W9JUN wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM, David Ranch wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:43 AM, David Ranch wrote:
netstat -an | grep -e 25 -e 465 Thank you for your feedback!!!!!! netstat -an | grep -e 25 -e 465
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:465 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 3025 private/proxywrite
unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 2465 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- sudo /sbin/iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT ax.25-- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT ipencap-- anywhere anywhere
DROP all -- !44.0.0.0/8 anywhere
DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:chargen
DROP udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:chargen
tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags:! FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: REMOVE name: tcp side: source
tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags: FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: SET name: tcp side: source
DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags: FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: UPDATE seconds: 60 hit_count: 5 name: tcp side: source
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere 44.0.0.0/8
ACCEPT ax.25-- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT ipencap-- anywhere anywhere
DROP all -- !44.0.0.0/8 anywhere
DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:chargen
DROP udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:chargen
tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags:! FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: REMOVE name: tcp side: source
tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags: FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: SET name: tcp side: source
DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcpflags: FIN,SYN,RST,ACK/SYN recent: UPDATE seconds: 60 hit_count: 5 name: tcp side: source
ACCEPT all -- 192.168.1.0/24 44.0.0.0/8 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT all -- 192.168.1.0/24 44.0.0.0/8
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT ax.25-- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT ipencap-- anywhere anywhere
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Richard, A very valid point. The DRAWS™ HAT integrates a lot of functionality and is purpose built for the applications that use it. Certainly one can build everything it offers, cheaper, given time and skill. I was noting the 'no solder' desire and I fall largely into that category, especially for very small parts. (I have monocular vision, so no depth perception and my good eye is aging). I do solder slightly larger and less critical stuff :) The observation is that when you take your DIY project to the club meeting, you will get a lot of "That's cool, can you make one for me?"
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:41 AM Richard Bates <richard@...> wrote: I think we're just comparing time vs money - my project took a little more tinkering but I saved $149.95. I acknowledge of course that the DRAWS card offers many other features, beyond what this simple project requires. --
John D. Hays Kingston, WA K7VE
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Richard Bates
I think we're just comparing time vs money - my project took a little more tinkering but I saved $149.95. I acknowledge of course that the DRAWS card offers many other features, beyond what this simple project requires.
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Richard Bates
David
- relay vs transistor - largely because I had a relay at hand - I didn't feel the delay difference was significant, compared to the 300ms Tx delay set in the TNC - also the relay ensured a clean short to ground - but I agree, a transistor would be fine - as to using the existing mini-jack - it was easier than making another hole in the RPi case - I didn't care about the RPi built-in audio-out, as I was using the USB sound adapter for both audio in & out So - both just my choice - but I don't claim either are significant to the overall idea. Richard
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Technical documentation for DRAWS™ -- includes schematic, pinout, etc. GPIO 12 and GPIO 23 provide PTT through the left and right DIN-6 connectors (amateur packet radio standard to radios). DRAWS™ provides 2 multi-speed packet (300/1200/9600/...) Direwolf modems through these connections. No soldering required, no hacking sound fobs, etc. Raw HAT, self assemble kit, and pre-built units. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:45 AM Ronny Julian <k4rjjradio@...> wrote:
John D. Hays Kingston, WA K7VE
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
David Ranch <dranch@...>
Hello RIchard, Your solution seems overly complex but maybe I'm missing something: - Why use a relay with a higher delay time compared to just using a simple transistor circuit with lower delays? - Why do all the complex tapping into the onboard output-only soundcard when you still need a soundcard input? Why not just do everything on the external sound device (input and output)? --David
On 06/20/2019 08:04 AM, Richard Bates
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:18 PM, Guillermo/Bill wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: A Simple Portable Packet Station for Emergency Communications
Richard Bates
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:18 PM, Guillermo/Bill wrote:
Could you expand on the PTT part a little bit?The DireWolf manual, section 9.2.8.3, page 66, explains the addition you need in the direwolf.conf file, for example to use GPIO 26 you want PTT GPIO 26
i.e. in this example, GPIO26 (pin #37) will go "high" when the software TNC wants to transmit. This small reed relay fits conveniently inside the RPi case, and can be soldered directly to to GPIO line. You can see that: - relay pin 1 connects to the radio PTT line - relay pin 2 connects to the GPIO line, pin 37 in this example - relay pins 3 and 4 connect to ground, for example pin 39 As I didn't need the functionality of the built-in RPi audio, I choose to disconnect the RPi audio-out lines from the built-in mini-jack, by breaking the tracks - so I could use it for the PTT line (relay pin 1). You could alternatively simply add a mini-jack to the RPi case and take the PTT signal out that way. Richard
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
David Ranch <dranch@...>
Hello Don, Ok.. the Rpi is the email server and your phone is the client. What kind of phone? Android? iPhone? When you're trying to have your phone get email from the Rpi, I assume your phone is on your home wifi.
You didn't provide any DNS test results from your phone which is what matters but assuming your Windows laptop is on the same Wifi network, it seems like you can resolve things. You have also shown that you can connection to port 465 (smtps) [encrypted smtp] and port 110 (pop3) [non-encrypted pop3]. Technically speaking, you should be fine at this point. Configure your email client on the phone to use port 465 for SMTP and it should work. If it MUST have port 25, then try the following in the raspberry pi: - run the command: netstat -an | grep -e 25 -e 465 I see: $ netstat -an | grep -e 25 -e 465 tcp 0 0 192.168.0.11:465 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:465 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 192.168.0.11:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN What the above shows is that I have both port 465 and 25 listening on IP address 192.168.0.11 and 127.0.0.1. What you need on your machine to show is 44.48.210.1 and 127.0.0.1. You would configure that in the /etc/postfix/main.cf file under the inet_interfaces stanza. It would look like: inet_interfaces = 44.48.210.1, localhost Then run: /etc/init.d/postfix restart and try the "netstat -an | grep -e 25 -e 465" command again. If I switch to data on my cell I can connect to 25, 465, and 110. If the testing above was all correct in the first place, all that and be left is a forwarding or filtering issue. What is the output of the following commands: #Should be a 0 cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward sudo /sbin/iptables -L --David KI6ZHD
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
Here's some dig info using my windows laptop
C:\Users\June>dig w9jun.ampr.org mx ; <<>> DiG 9.11.8 <<>> w9jun.ampr.org mx
;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44150 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;w9jun.ampr.org. IN MX ;; ANSWER SECTION:
w9jun.ampr.org. 3600 IN MX 5 w9jun.ampr.org. ;; Query time: 143 msec
;; SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222) ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 20 09:02:58 Eastern Daylight Time 2019 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 59 C:\Users\June>dig w9jun.ampr.org ; <<>> DiG 9.11.8 <<>> w9jun.ampr.org
;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23976 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;w9jun.ampr.org. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION:
w9jun.ampr.org. 3600 IN A 44.48.210.1 ;; Query time: 272 msec ;; SERVER: 208.67.222.222#53(208.67.222.222) ;; WHEN: Thu Jun 20 09:04:59 Eastern Daylight Time 2019 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 59
|
|
|
|
Re: Web Server Using Postfix
#networking
Good day!
Is the Raspberry Pi the email client or the email server? server Are you saying that if you configure the email client to use the IP address vs. DNS name, that's the difference? Or is the issue that one is the Internal IP address and the other is the external IP? If I use the local lan address for the PI the email client (which is on my phone) everything works fine with ports 25 and 110. If I use w9jun.ampr.org (44.48.210.1), the client doesn't setup. As far as the dig command, I'm using a windows computer but here is the telnet info: My laptop is connected to my local router: C:\Users\June>telnet w9jun.ampr.org 25 Connecting To w9jun.ampr.org... NOTHING Got a connection to port 465 220 w9jun.ampr.org ESMTP Postfix (Debian/GNU) ehlo w9jun.ampr.org 250-w9jun.ampr.org 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 10240000 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN Got a connection to port 110 +OK Qpopper (version 4.1.0) at w9jun.ampr.org starting. If I switch to data on my cell I can connect to 25, 465, and 110.
|
|
|
