Date
41 - 60 of 64
QCX-mini constant 700Hz tone #qcxmini
Mont Pierce KM6WT
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 09:27 AM, Gregg Myers wrote:
Maybe "birdie" is not the right word to describe this... Mine did too, except, when I switched to Split VFO mode or RIT mode. In these modes you are changing the Receive only frequency while the XMIT frequency is Not updated. In these modes, as I tune by 100Hz steps, I can hear many tones in different places. Usually loudest with VFO A tuned 500 to 800 hertz higher than VFO B. That's my opinion too, as all three of my QCXs have the same issue at different audio levels... even though they are on different bands, and mini's layout is quite different than the QCX+. Do you hear the same tone across the band when you're in VFO Split Mode? Thanks, km6wt |
|
Gregg Myers
Hi Mont, For my observation in split mode: the tone will vary depending on the separation of the split of A and B in split mode. If A and B are set to exactly the same frequency and I am in Split mode, then the tone is the same pitch as if I am not in Split mode. But if I am in Split mode and start to tune one of the VFO (ie start to offset A and B frequencies from each other), I hear the tone change in pitch as the separation changes. Once A and B are separated by more than 700Hz, I then no longer hear any background tone. The tone is perhaps the loudest when A and B are separated by about 350Hz. Which is also a little strange to me as I thought the separation of Transmit and Receive in non-split mode is 700Hz (since my CW offset is the same as the default, 700Hz)??? So really, I don't understand exactly what is going on except it appears to be dependent on what the Si5351a is being directed to do by the software. BTW, as I checked on my mini, the transmit frequency (Clk 2) is not outputting anything unless you are actually transmitting (ie. Clk2 only 'turns on' during transmit), although internal to the chip the multisynths are likely doing their thing all the time. So as best I can guess, I am hearing some of the multisynth oscillator leakage or interference. ' I tried to record the tone as I was in split mode and slowly separated A and B from each other until they were about 700Hz apart in the attached MP3. Sorry in advance about the quality. About 6 seconds into the recording, the VFOs are separated by 350Hz which is the loudest point. Note that I amplified the recording quite a bit so as to make the background more obvious and also I did not have an antenna hooked up for the recording, so minimal atmospheric noise was present. Again, in actual operating conditions, the tone is low enough that after a few minutes of listening I don't seem to notice it. 73, Gregg On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 12:16 PM Mont Pierce KM6WT <de.km6wt@...> wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 09:27 AM, Gregg Myers wrote: |
|
Mont Pierce KM6WT
On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 02:28 PM, Gregg Myers wrote:
BTW, as I checked on my mini, the transmit frequency (Clk 2) is not outputting anything unless you are actually transmitting (ie. Clk2 only 'turns on' during transmit),Yes, that's what I'm seeing too. And your right, Clk 2 output is turned off, so nothing when scoping Clk 2 pin. although internal to the chip the multisynths are likely doing their thing all the time. So as best I can guess, I am hearing some of the multisynth oscillator leakage or interference.Yes, I agree, it must be some kind of crosstalk inside the chip... And since it happens in all 3 of my QCXs it's likely an issue inherent in the Si5351a chip itself and just needs to be programmed to be avoided. If you scope Clk 0, you will see that it changes frequency to 25MHz during transmit, and back to operating frequency during receive. Maybe Hans can do something similar to Clk 2. For example:
I wonder if Clk 2's freq shows up on a logic analyzer while scoping Clk 0 or Clk 1.... Thanks, km6wt |
|
Hans Summers
Hi all I have not been ignoring this thread but I am very busy at the moment... as soon as I can get things under control, I will come back to this issue and do some investigation here. As far as I can tell from the correspondence, band noise is generally overwhelming this tone. It is not a critical show-stopper issue. But I would like to understand and resolve it. I have a list of firmware things to investigate. When the dust settles here I will spend some days investigating these. 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:17 AM Mont Pierce KM6WT <de.km6wt@...> wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 02:28 PM, Gregg Myers wrote: |
|
There are actually several tones in Gregg's recording. There is one tone there when the recording starts, a second tone starts at about 4 seconds in, a third tone starts at about 12 seconds in, and I think another starts at about 15 seconds in (but it's so weak I could be imagining it). Not sure if that means anything, but that's what I observed.
|
|
Gregg Myers
Hi Jim, That's correct. In separating VFO A and B up to 750Hz apart, I hear the tone pitch appear (say from a low tone to a high tone) several times across that frequency span. I'm not sure what that means either. 73, Gregg On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:48 AM Jim Allyn - N7JA <jim@...> wrote: There are actually several tones in Gregg's recording. There is one tone there when the recording starts, a second tone starts at about 4 seconds in, a third tone starts at about 12 seconds in, and I think another starts at about 15 seconds in (but it's so weak I could be imagining it). Not sure if that means anything, but that's what I observed. |
|
Rod Smith
Thanks everyone for coming back with such helpful information.
As soon as I saw your post, Mont, the penny dropped. Your description fits the symptoms I'm seeing. Sure enough, in effect I have a low level "netting" tone that as you and Gregg describe must surely be caused by an internal signal leaking somehow from the Si5351 at the (intended next) transmit frequency. If I lock my sign gen feeding -110dBm at the antenna socket to zero beat with the rogue "netting signal", then go to split mode, I hear a strong beat note at the difference between A and B frequencies. Two potential "fixes" came to mind - the "Move Clk2 frequency well away during Rx" that Mont describes or, potentially, remove the resistor that feeds CLK2 alignment signal to the antenna input. There again, as Gregg found and Mont confirms, there's no signal actually at the CLK2 pin - so that may not work (but still might due to pick up along the track). Daniel - good question regarding other ICs etc - my 74ACT00 voltages seem fine and it seems to be working OK. Similarly the processor volts are OK and it seems to be doing its stuff re display, ADC, keying, sidetone, CW reader,and so on. D1 and D2 are fine. When I killed the voltage regulator I had only 8V at the supply socket, so ~7.3V? ended up on the 5V rail. I think all the ICs bar the Si5351 are specified to tolerate 7V max (another of several "if only" thoughts that haunt me!). I'd expected the Si5351 to fail on account of, what, nearly 6V applied to it. It's still possible I suppose that the (I'm assuming for now) internal Tx freq signal is the stronger on account of some damage done; but that seems a bit subtle for a failure. Similarly maybe the 74ACT00 switching is a little less clean on the gate that feeds the alignment signal to the antenna (but again that would only be an issue if the assumed Tx signal is propogated along that route). I'm still wating to come across some subtle failure - with fingers crossed that my mini's all now as good as it can be :o) Finally a big thanks, Hans, for your comments - as you say, not a critical issue. I hope that dust settles for you soon and that calm descends peacefully upon your shoulders. Best wishes all Rod G0VKX "When you understand the inside the outside will be just fine" |
|
Switching the oscillator on and off or changing its frequency by more than a few kHz takes some amount of time. This might interfere with the full break-in operating mode and may not be the ideal solution, even if it's a quick fix.
|
|
Mont Pierce KM6WT
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 06:23 AM, Bob M. wrote:
Switching the oscillator on and off or changing its frequency by more than a few kHz takes some amount of time. This might interfere with the full break-in operating mode and may not be the ideal solution, even if it's a quick fix.It's already turning Clk 2 On/Off for keying, and it changes Clk 0 Off/On frequency during keying. I asked Hans previously about the affects on QSK with sending all this data through I2C to the Si5351a. Apparently with the I2C running at 400KHz, there's plenty of time between the dits & dahs without affecting QSK. I'm sure Hans will find a solution once all the Fires are under control. Fortunately, 99.99% of the time it doesn't affect normal operations. Unfortunately, that still leaves the 0.01% 73 km6wt |
|
Rod Smith
Hi
A little more info from me that I'm cautiously optimistic will help diagnose and in due course cure this minor but niggling issue: After futile efforts on my part to detect the source of the "next Tx" frequency that's causing that 700Hz tone - using another receiver on "narrow cw" bandwidth for example - it dawned on me that the mini itself was all I needed - I could use the mini's own antenna Rx input terminal. I probed very very carefully around the underside of the main pcb, with the mini's own antenna input via a capacitor (for belts-and-braces abundance of caution). The 700Hz tone became clearly audible in the mini's connected earpiece when connecting to R55, or IC3 pins 4 or 10. It's a weak signal but definitely above the noise; this wasn't the case when probing to the ground/ earth or to any other pin of IC3. To my mind this demonstrates that the 700Hz tone is caused by a weak signal from CLK2 of the Si5351 on the "next intended Tx frequency". Which is encouraging. I imagine that something around perhaps -115dBm or less wasn't going to appear on a 'scope, by the way. Nothing here is intended in any way whatsoever to pressurise or hasten Hans to do anything. Cheers all Rod G0VKX "When you understand the inside the outside will be just fine" |
|
Was there ever a resolution to this problem?
James |
|
Mont Pierce KM6WT
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 01:02 PM, KB9NBL wrote:
Was there ever a resolution to this problem?As far as I know Hans has not had time yet to look at this... I do know that on receive he turns off the Si5351a's Clk2 output. And on transmit, he turns off Clk1, and reprograms Clk0 to 25MHz (or vise-versa). This is needed to keep the caps charged that are attached to the FST3253. I'm hoping that when he turns off Clk2, he can also change it's frequency setting by something (e.g. at least 1MHz up or down). Then if there is any bleedthru internal to the Si5351a, at least it will be off frequency and shouldn't be detected or noticed. Hopefully Hans will get to it soon and find an elegant solution I'm sure. :) :) :) After first noticing this in my QCX-mini, I went back to my 2 QCX+ rigs. It is in all my QCX rigs, although not nearly as bad as in my QCX-mini. It is really an issue when using RIT or split frequency. In fact, split frequency has several spurs(?) on all 3 of my QCXs, as you tune the RX frequency away from the TX frequency... 73 km6wt |
|
Was there a clear resolution to this issue?
Thanks James |
|
Rod Smith
Hi
I wonder whether someone is willing and able to to try removing the resistor that feeds CLK2 alignment signal to the antenna input? That might attenuate the symptoms enough to be useful, albeit at the expense of losing the alignment signal(s). I'm not going to mess further with my early-version QCX mini, which only just made it through my eventually successful efforts to replace a couple of op amps. 73 Rod G0VKX |
|
Paul Cooper, V7/KA4WPX
I've had the same issue with the 700Hz tone. When I toggle to dual VFO mode the tone disappears.
Now, if I could determine the cause of the growling/idling engine sound at various intervals, which can be modulated by keying in practice mode or toggling the mini then this will be an amazing little machine, indeed. 73, Paul V7/KA4WPX |
|
Rod Smith
Hi Paul
Yes - the 700Hz constant tone is caused by a leakage from the Si5351 CLK2, which is evidently set the the "next intended Tx frequency. So, when the mini is set to "split", that tone can be shifted out of the Rx audio passband by shifting the tx frequency. But with the tx and rx frequencies the same, I still hear that 700Hz tone. Do you? Do you hear the growling, and the 700Hz tone, when your mini is connected to a reasonably good antenna? I can hear the tone (on a quiet band). I can't help regarding the growl - sorry! 73 Rod G0VKX |
|
Paul Cooper, V7/KA4WPX
Hi there, Rod.
Thanks for writing. Yes, when RX and TX frequencies are different no 700Hz tone is heard; in simplex operation the tone is audible. The 700Hz tone is audible with or without an antenna, as is the growl. The growl, however, obscures all but the strongest signals within 500-1000Hz. I do not know if they are related. 73, Paul V7/KA4WPX |
|
Paul, can you give me a specific configuration I can set up on a QCX to experience it?
-- Julian, N4JO. |
|
Rod Smith
Thanks for the info Paul. You have the same issue as me with the 700Hz tone. Hans I think still has it on his list - to investigate. You'll probably have seen in the other messages on this topic that I've suggested:
"Two potential "fixes" came to mind - the "Move Clk2 frequency well away during Rx" that Mont describes or, potentially, remove the resistor that feeds CLK2 alignment signal to the antenna input. There again, as Gregg found and Mont confirms, there's no signal actually at the CLK2 pin - so that may not work (but still might due to pick up along the track)." The "move Clk frequency well away during Rx" would need Hans to modify the (already crammed) firmware. The resistor removal is fiddly and may not work - it needs a brave someone who's experiencing the symptoms to remove that resistor on an already-aligned mini, to compare beofre and after. My mini is too beaten up for me to risk it, I'm sorry to say. I made a ham fisted replacement of a couple of duff op amps (mine is a v1 mini) and I don;t want to chance my luck on that pcb unless I have to. Good luck - I hope someone somewhere can help you fix that growl too. 73 Rod G0VKX |
|
Paul Cooper, V7/KA4WPX
Hi,Julian. If you could please provide a bit more detail in what you mean by configuration I'll gladly pass that info along. Thank you.
73, Paul V7/KA4WPX |
|