|
Re: QCX Good news
Thanks Dan!
73 Hans G0UPL
http://qrp-labs.com
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl
Thanks Dan!
73 Hans G0UPL
http://qrp-labs.com
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl
|
By
Hans Summers
·
#90009
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
Dave,
you seem to be getting Exactly the same results as me. rx current 180mA, low audio out (btw, mic input is wrong input for wsjt-x - select qdx ip and op), poor LSB separation. When you have
Dave,
you seem to be getting Exactly the same results as me. rx current 180mA, low audio out (btw, mic input is wrong input for wsjt-x - select qdx ip and op), poor LSB separation. When you have
|
By
KEN G4APB
·
#90008
·
|
|
Re: Issues with QDX after the build
#qdx
I personally have not had good success with the burning the insulation off method. I find I have much better results using an Exacto blade to scrape off the enamel from magnet wire. Yes it's more time
I personally have not had good success with the burning the insulation off method. I find I have much better results using an Exacto blade to scrape off the enamel from magnet wire. Yes it's more time
|
By
KC9REN
·
#90007
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
By the way, my current draw readings are from my bench power supply so may not be that accurate. After running the radio for a couple of hours and making several QSO's, nothing got too hot (apart from
By the way, my current draw readings are from my bench power supply so may not be that accurate. After running the radio for a couple of hours and making several QSO's, nothing got too hot (apart from
|
By
Dave, M0OOR
·
#90006
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
** Update **
In the interests of sharing my findings, I have now got it working.
What I have done:
- Reworked L12 - this improved things greatly ( I must have had a fault there).
- Reflowed joints on
** Update **
In the interests of sharing my findings, I have now got it working.
What I have done:
- Reworked L12 - this improved things greatly ( I must have had a fault there).
- Reflowed joints on
|
By
Dave, M0OOR
·
#90005
·
|
|
Re: While poking around on the QRP=Labs website this morning ...
By
@BruceUK
·
#90004
·
|
|
Re: While poking around on the QRP=Labs website this morning ...
My experience is on QCX+ rather than QDX but for what its worth :
Having put a very very light smear of heatsink compound (standard white silicone/zinc stuff) on the flat faces that get screwed to
My experience is on QCX+ rather than QDX but for what its worth :
Having put a very very light smear of heatsink compound (standard white silicone/zinc stuff) on the flat faces that get screwed to
|
By
@BruceUK
·
#90003
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
Mike
Ah yes!
I too remember now. Hans did say somewhere that the different audio ICs in the v3 took more current.
If Dave's measurement is accurate his is taking a little more than normal. But not a
Mike
Ah yes!
I too remember now. Hans did say somewhere that the different audio ICs in the v3 took more current.
If Dave's measurement is accurate his is taking a little more than normal. But not a
|
By
Alan G4ZFQ
·
#90002
·
|
|
Re: BS170 MOSFETS
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 03:52 PM, John Rabson wrote:
I seem to recall a question in my IEE (1966?) fiinals which asked me to outline the design of a 1kW transistor AF amplifier. I asked a neighbour who
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 03:52 PM, John Rabson wrote:
I seem to recall a question in my IEE (1966?) fiinals which asked me to outline the design of a 1kW transistor AF amplifier. I asked a neighbour who
|
By
Da Amazin' man G0FTD
·
#90000
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
I think the 100ma RX current value was from early QDX history and with the various upgrades most recent builds have been averaging out in the 140-150 ma range. I believe there was a note to this
I think the 100ma RX current value was from early QDX history and with the various upgrades most recent builds have been averaging out in the 140-150 ma range. I believe there was a note to this
|
By
Mike Easterbrook
·
#89999
·
|
|
QCX Good news
We hear about all the problems on here, so I thought I'd post something positive.
I recently installed updated 1.08 firmware chips for my original QCX 40 & 20m and QCX mini 30 & 60m. The minis have
We hear about all the problems on here, so I thought I'd post something positive.
I recently installed updated 1.08 firmware chips for my original QCX 40 & 20m and QCX mini 30 & 60m. The minis have
|
By
Daniel Walter
·
#89998
·
|
|
Re: BS170 MOSFETS
I seem to recall a question in my IEE (1966?) fiinals which asked me to outline the design of a 1kW transistor AF amplifier. I asked a neighbour who worked in semiconductor research if the examiners
I seem to recall a question in my IEE (1966?) fiinals which asked me to outline the design of a 1kW transistor AF amplifier. I asked a neighbour who worked in semiconductor research if the examiners
|
By
John Rabson
·
#89997
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
Dave,
This test shows if T2 is wound and installed correctly.
How much down is LSB? If it is around possibly 50dBthen the secondaries must be wound and connected correctly. Fundamentally there is no
Dave,
This test shows if T2 is wound and installed correctly.
How much down is LSB? If it is around possibly 50dBthen the secondaries must be wound and connected correctly. Fundamentally there is no
|
By
Alan G4ZFQ
·
#89996
·
|
|
Re: BS170 MOSFETS
Yep:
https://www.mouser.com/new/nxp-semiconductors/nxp-mrf1k50h-transistor/
As used in the Elecraft KPA-1500 (two of them, which gives a great deal of overhead).
And I do have CK-722's. They came in
Yep:
https://www.mouser.com/new/nxp-semiconductors/nxp-mrf1k50h-transistor/
As used in the Elecraft KPA-1500 (two of them, which gives a great deal of overhead).
And I do have CK-722's. They came in
|
By
Dave New, N8SBE
·
#89995
·
|
|
Re: QDX smoked - what to test
#qdx
Jason,
The next step would be to verify IC1. It should have 5volts on the input and 3.3volts on the output. A correct input and no output would mean a bad IC1. I am using the fact that the current
Jason,
The next step would be to verify IC1. It should have 5volts on the input and 3.3volts on the output. A correct input and no output would mean a bad IC1. I am using the fact that the current
|
By
Evan Hand
·
#89994
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
I did do the sweeps with a dummy load on all bands and the USB graphs look fine albeit that the LSB graphs don't look as low as possibly they should do, so maybe the unwanted sideband rejection isn't
I did do the sweeps with a dummy load on all bands and the USB graphs look fine albeit that the LSB graphs don't look as low as possibly they should do, so maybe the unwanted sideband rejection isn't
|
By
Dave, M0OOR
·
#89993
·
|
|
Re: QDX Deaf with high current.
#qdx
If the 5V and 3.3V regulators are hot, it would follow some other components will also be hotter than they should, especially I/C’s.
Finding same should point you in the right direction.
If the 5V and 3.3V regulators are hot, it would follow some other components will also be hotter than they should, especially I/C’s.
Finding same should point you in the right direction.
|
By
howard winwood G4GPF
·
#89992
·
|
|
Re: QDX smoked - what to test
#qdx
Yes, I see 5V on the output of IC2.
Jason KB1ZOK
Yes, I see 5V on the output of IC2.
Jason KB1ZOK
|
By
jasongilroy@...
·
#89991
·
|
|
Re: QDX Documentation
Hi Hans,
wow that was quick! Thanks for confirming, I see the site is now updated.
Hopefully will have a working unit this weekend :D
73 Elia
M0ZHN
Hi Hans,
wow that was quick! Thanks for confirming, I see the site is now updated.
Hopefully will have a working unit this weekend :D
73 Elia
M0ZHN
|
By
M0ZHN
·
#89990
·
|
|
Re: QDX Documentation
Hi Elia
3 and 3a are the same manual. I have just amended the website to make that clear. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
73 Hans G0UPL
http://qrp-labs.com
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl
Hi Elia
3 and 3a are the same manual. I have just amended the website to make that clear. Thanks for pointing this out to me.
73 Hans G0UPL
http://qrp-labs.com
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/g0upl
|
By
Hans Summers
·
#89989
·
|