|
Re: TX and RX Frequency Difference
#40m
Hi Ernie. If you have the 27 MHz reference crystal in there, and if you don't have a GPS, try setting your reference frequency to 27,007,036 and see if that helps.... You are actually 800 Hz off per
Hi Ernie. If you have the 27 MHz reference crystal in there, and if you don't have a GPS, try setting your reference frequency to 27,007,036 and see if that helps.... You are actually 800 Hz off per
|
By
Ronald Taylor
·
#80429
·
|
|
Re: TX and RX Frequency Difference
#40m
Hi,
Calibration by GPS will correct this. Did you purchase the QLG2 SE GPS accessory. I can't help you with manual calibration. I'm sure other posts will follow.
The GPS option is critical for Beacon
Hi,
Calibration by GPS will correct this. Did you purchase the QLG2 SE GPS accessory. I can't help you with manual calibration. I'm sure other posts will follow.
The GPS option is critical for Beacon
|
By
George Korper
·
#80428
·
|
|
TX and RX Frequency Difference
#40m
I have just completed my QCX Mini Build for 40M. The RX and TX Freq seem to be off by about 80Hz. For example, I TX on 7.115.20 and RBN says I'm at 7116.00. The delta is consistent no matter where
I have just completed my QCX Mini Build for 40M. The RX and TX Freq seem to be off by about 80Hz. For example, I TX on 7.115.20 and RBN says I'm at 7116.00. The delta is consistent no matter where
|
By
Ernie Bailey - N2DGQ
·
#80427
·
|
|
Re: New QDX up and running, but we need to talk about FT8 and QRP
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:54 PM, Paulo CT wrote:
Should we start talking about a new spot for digital QRP ops?No... the QRO guys will just take that over too.
Mike
WM4B
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:54 PM, Paulo CT wrote:
Should we start talking about a new spot for digital QRP ops?No... the QRO guys will just take that over too.
Mike
WM4B
|
By
Mike Besemer - WM4B
·
#80426
·
|
|
Re: New QDX up and running, but we need to talk about FT8 and QRP
I agree completely, however in today's ego driven world I am not sure this is fixable. For me the challenge/thrill is miles/watt and no simply miles.
I agree completely, however in today's ego driven world I am not sure this is fixable. For me the challenge/thrill is miles/watt and no simply miles.
|
By
N3MNT
·
#80425
·
|
|
Re: QCX-Mini 20m build complete - couple of issues
#20m
Thank you everyone for your comments which have been very helpful! For now I will assume that my QCX is working as it should (no mistakes building it) and I will do my best to avoid the RF issues.
vy
Thank you everyone for your comments which have been very helpful! For now I will assume that my QCX is working as it should (no mistakes building it) and I will do my best to avoid the RF issues.
vy
|
By
Leopold v. Bismarck
·
#80424
·
|
|
Re: Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
I've got an idea for an inexpensive dummy load:
I've got an idea for an inexpensive dummy load:
|
By
Pat - N0SHU
·
#80423
·
|
|
Re: 160m WSPR worked great for me on 1.09 firmware overnight
Oh dear, I didn't want to cause trouble :-(
Yeah, "Save State", that works; my troubled mind can handle that.
No, don't change a thing unless you need the space: it ain't broke, so you shouldn't feel
Oh dear, I didn't want to cause trouble :-(
Yeah, "Save State", that works; my troubled mind can handle that.
No, don't change a thing unless you need the space: it ain't broke, so you shouldn't feel
|
By
Julian N4JO
·
#80422
·
|
|
Re: Second Best location for an antenna tuner
#antenna
#tune
Hi,
Good question and one I have asked myself.
My antenna is a 2 x 16 meter doublet fed with 11 meter open feeder which enters the house in a
fixed cupboard in the living room. Don't ask why!
The
Hi,
Good question and one I have asked myself.
My antenna is a 2 x 16 meter doublet fed with 11 meter open feeder which enters the house in a
fixed cupboard in the living room. Don't ask why!
The
|
By
Roelof Bakker
·
#80421
·
|
|
New QDX up and running, but we need to talk about FT8 and QRP
Hello everyone. Just completed my QDX build sucessfully.
However, running QRP on the actual FT8 channels is an exercise in frustation. Long have gonne the days that a 25w signal was considered
Hello everyone. Just completed my QDX build sucessfully.
However, running QRP on the actual FT8 channels is an exercise in frustation. Long have gonne the days that a 25w signal was considered
|
By
Paulo CT
·
#80420
·
|
|
Re: Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
Jack,
Nice idea, except that my primary computer is a Mac and it died over the weekend, and my smartphone doesn’t have the functionality to do that.
After I adjust some things here, I may be able
Jack,
Nice idea, except that my primary computer is a Mac and it died over the weekend, and my smartphone doesn’t have the functionality to do that.
After I adjust some things here, I may be able
|
By
Jim Strohm
·
#80419
·
|
|
Re: 160m WSPR worked great for me on 1.09 firmware overnight
If you do decide to harvest those bytes, could you change how the vfo works at the same time? I've mentioned before but it really makes no sense to go from A -> B -> Split -> then back to A. better
If you do decide to harvest those bytes, could you change how the vfo works at the same time? I've mentioned before but it really makes no sense to go from A -> B -> Split -> then back to A. better
|
By
mike/w1mt
·
#80418
·
|
|
Re: Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
Jim:
Why not just find the file using Windows Explore (the file utility) and drag it into your email. Just open a few lines where you want it inserted and leave the cursor there, then drag the file
Jim:
Why not just find the file using Windows Explore (the file utility) and drag it into your email. Just open a few lines where you want it inserted and leave the cursor there, then drag the file
|
By
jjpurdum
·
#80417
·
|
|
Re: 160m WSPR worked great for me on 1.09 firmware overnight
RIT, VFO A, B and which VFO is current, as well as RIT in 4.2, are all parameters which ahould be thought of as default start-up parameters used in power-up.
And the "Save settings" action is more of
RIT, VFO A, B and which VFO is current, as well as RIT in 4.2, are all parameters which ahould be thought of as default start-up parameters used in power-up.
And the "Save settings" action is more of
|
By
Hans Summers
·
#80416
·
|
|
Re: Second Best location for an antenna tuner
#antenna
#tune
Dunno. I once used the following setup :
inverted vee dipole > homebrew ladder line > 4:1 balun outside > short 50ohm coax > AMU inside > TRX
It worked
Dunno. I once used the following setup :
inverted vee dipole > homebrew ladder line > 4:1 balun outside > short 50ohm coax > AMU inside > TRX
It worked
|
By
Michael.2E0IHW
·
#80415
·
|
|
Re: Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
And groups.io thinks that a .jpg isn’t a file. So will need to delete the file folder and create a an image folder for the picture of the dummy load.
Kind of disappointing and frustrating,
And groups.io thinks that a .jpg isn’t a file. So will need to delete the file folder and create a an image folder for the picture of the dummy load.
Kind of disappointing and frustrating,
|
By
Jim Strohm
·
#80414
·
|
|
Re: Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
OK, now
https://groups.io/g/QRPLabs/files/Cheap%20HB%20dummy%20load
Exists.
73, Willie N1JBJ
OK, now
https://groups.io/g/QRPLabs/files/Cheap%20HB%20dummy%20load
Exists.
73, Willie N1JBJ
|
By
William Smith
·
#80413
·
|
|
Re: CAT Control HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hello Slade
I may have missed some of the earlier posts regarding your problem so sorry if I am digging up older dirt.
I had a similar problem as yours, it turned out to be the cable that wouldn't
Hello Slade
I may have missed some of the earlier posts regarding your problem so sorry if I am digging up older dirt.
I had a similar problem as yours, it turned out to be the cable that wouldn't
|
By
Ian G4GIR
·
#80412
·
|
|
Added Folder /Cheap HB dummy load
#file-notice
Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> added folder /Cheap HB dummy load
Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> added folder /Cheap HB dummy load
|
By
QRPLabs@groups.io Notification <noreply@...>
·
#80411
·
|
|
Re: Cheap HB dummy load
A CPU cooler from an obsolete desktop computer will handle the heat sink duties nicely. You will need to provide power for the fan; they usually have 12V fans, so the same power supply that you use to
A CPU cooler from an obsolete desktop computer will handle the heat sink duties nicely. You will need to provide power for the fan; they usually have 12V fans, so the same power supply that you use to
|
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#80410
·
|