|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
Agree with Allison. The extra length of the plastic gets snaggy when putting a radio in a bag.
If you look at a QCX the long BNC is ridiculous. So I ask Allison if the shorter BNC is reliable.
Agree with Allison. The extra length of the plastic gets snaggy when putting a radio in a bag.
If you look at a QCX the long BNC is ridiculous. So I ask Allison if the shorter BNC is reliable.
|
By
George Korper
·
#50917
·
|
|
Re: 500 times for the SMA
Well actually, I only object to the length of the current BNC.
I was trying to match the "MountainTopper" and a short BNC is used on that I think.
So I would like to see Han's comment on
reducing the
Well actually, I only object to the length of the current BNC.
I was trying to match the "MountainTopper" and a short BNC is used on that I think.
So I would like to see Han's comment on
reducing the
|
By
George Korper
·
#50916
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
SMA for size.
BNC for durability and less fiddly when up on a hill with cold hands.
Note some of the PCB edge mount BNC may provide a lower profile.
Allison
-------------------------------
Please
SMA for size.
BNC for durability and less fiddly when up on a hill with cold hands.
Note some of the PCB edge mount BNC may provide a lower profile.
Allison
-------------------------------
Please
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX
·
#50915
·
|
|
Re: 500 times for the SMA
Worn out dozens over the years. I'd add 500 is optimistic.
Failure mode is center socket looses flex and fails.
Second most common the center pin of cable breaks loose
from the internal wire.
Best
Worn out dozens over the years. I'd add 500 is optimistic.
Failure mode is center socket looses flex and fails.
Second most common the center pin of cable breaks loose
from the internal wire.
Best
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX
·
#50914
·
|
|
500 times for the SMA
We should live so long!
By
George Korper
·
#50913
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
Regardless of the connector used, I would likely not mount it on the PCB even if the board provides for it. Off-board mounting, to me, gives me more flexibility in the case I might use. My problem is
Regardless of the connector used, I would likely not mount it on the PCB even if the board provides for it. Off-board mounting, to me, gives me more flexibility in the case I might use. My problem is
|
By
jjpurdum
·
#50912
·
|
|
Re: QCX+ 30 done! Low power.
James, if you are getting that much power out, then everything else is probably good, so OK to play with the lowpass filter.
Ron
James, if you are getting that much power out, then everything else is probably good, so OK to play with the lowpass filter.
Ron
|
By
Ronald Taylor
·
#50911
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
Hi,
I have a nanoVNA with SMA fittings. The early deterioration most likely affects their performance in the microwaves. I use mine at HF and may use it some day a time or two on two meters but
Hi,
I have a nanoVNA with SMA fittings. The early deterioration most likely affects their performance in the microwaves. I use mine at HF and may use it some day a time or two on two meters but
|
By
Bill Cromwell
·
#50910
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
Please, no. Those give me nightmares. Too many cases of them either not staying in or refusing to come out.
Please, no. Those give me nightmares. Too many cases of them either not staying in or refusing to come out.
|
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#50909
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
What about RCA connectors?
What about RCA connectors?
|
By
Phil/K3UT
·
#50908
·
|
|
Re: help !
Jay, did you check voltages on IC5, 6 and 7 yet? Are you seeing the nominal 2.5 volts at pins 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 of all three of those?
Ron
Jay, did you check voltages on IC5, 6 and 7 yet? Are you seeing the nominal 2.5 volts at pins 1,2,3,5,6 & 7 of all three of those?
Ron
|
By
Ronald Taylor
·
#50907
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
Supporting both SMA and BNC footprints makes a lot of sense to me.
Use right angle, PCB mount connectors. Not the edge mount SMA's like those used on the nano. I'd expect that having the connectors
Supporting both SMA and BNC footprints makes a lot of sense to me.
Use right angle, PCB mount connectors. Not the edge mount SMA's like those used on the nano. I'd expect that having the connectors
|
By
Dave VE3LHO
·
#50906
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
I admit I voted for SMA, mainly on the basis of my experience with those threaded plastic BNC connectors, UGH!
I'm more in favor of a bulkhead mounted connector with a jumper to the board. If the the
I admit I voted for SMA, mainly on the basis of my experience with those threaded plastic BNC connectors, UGH!
I'm more in favor of a bulkhead mounted connector with a jumper to the board. If the the
|
By
Al Holt
·
#50905
·
|
|
Re: QCX Replacement encoder
I had the same problem show up a couple months ago. I ended up taking it apart and liberally applying WD-40 to where the turning knob comes in. Works better than before now, though initially I noticed
I had the same problem show up a couple months ago. I ended up taking it apart and liberally applying WD-40 to where the turning knob comes in. Works better than before now, though initially I noticed
|
By
Cory KG7BBV
·
#50904
·
|
|
Re: How about an ultra-portable "QCX mini" version?
#qcx
Hans,
9.1 cuin ....with a 2x16 display, and DIP ATMega328.....WOW. .....with all the SMT premounted, that's cool.
I think 92mm x 25mm x 63mm is one of the "standard" aluminum clamshell enclosures like
Hans,
9.1 cuin ....with a 2x16 display, and DIP ATMega328.....WOW. .....with all the SMT premounted, that's cool.
I think 92mm x 25mm x 63mm is one of the "standard" aluminum clamshell enclosures like
|
By
Kees T
·
#50903
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
I'm not pro or con on this but it is interesting to note that Elecraft uses SMA connectors on their 2/4 meter transverter for the KX3.
I'm well past 50 cycles with no trouble on mine but now
I'm not pro or con on this but it is interesting to note that Elecraft uses SMA connectors on their 2/4 meter transverter for the KX3.
I'm well past 50 cycles with no trouble on mine but now
|
By
Scott McDonald
·
#50902
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
BNC connectors without the plastic housing exist. I have a mini oscilloscope, a DSO138, that has one.
Here are links to
BNC connectors without the plastic housing exist. I have a mini oscilloscope, a DSO138, that has one.
Here are links to
|
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#50901
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
I would say prefer board mount BNC .....but find one which does not have the plastic housing (I believe they have those). If you are really an industrious builder with all 5 fingers on each hand, cut
I would say prefer board mount BNC .....but find one which does not have the plastic housing (I believe they have those). If you are really an industrious builder with all 5 fingers on each hand, cut
|
By
Kees T
·
#50900
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
True, but Tyco Electronics also specifies only 50 cycles for their gold plated center pin BNC connectors. https://docs.rs-online.com/616e/0900766b81409ff0.pdf
73 de LA9XKA - Per
True, but Tyco Electronics also specifies only 50 cycles for their gold plated center pin BNC connectors. https://docs.rs-online.com/616e/0900766b81409ff0.pdf
73 de LA9XKA - Per
|
By
Per - LA9XKA
·
#50899
·
|
|
Re: QCX mini: RF output BNC or SMA
#poll-notice
SMA connectors have a limited life span measured in only 100's of mating cycles. Check the data sheets for Ampehnol, Pasternack, (etc) parts. The inexpensive SMA's from Asia quite likely are even less
SMA connectors have a limited life span measured in only 100's of mating cycles. Check the data sheets for Ampehnol, Pasternack, (etc) parts. The inexpensive SMA's from Asia quite likely are even less
|
By
Graham, VE3GTC
·
#50898
·
|