This seems like a good an helpful suggestion. No, I have not left it on for an extended period, not realizing that this could make a difference. I will give it a try. Thanks! Now if someone can

Vern first reaction is that the QCX already possesses nice CW filtering - and it is narrow enough that most of the utility of that programmable filter isn't useful. okay if you have up to 10

That’s it. Thanks -- Ron W3ZV

Hi Tony, I saw your post and was curious about my QLG1 time compared to a WWVB corrected clock I have. When I first started up the QLG1, I saw a 2-3 second discrepancy between the two but after a few

I just got mail from the QRPLabs facility in Missouri. It contained a half inch square CB with no information or instruction. I have recently taken delivery of QCX+ and TXCO kits. Anyone have an idea

Not certain what this interference has to do with the suggested party but XP and Win7 are not what I would call old. I use a reliable Dell laptop running Win 98 for digi modes and upgrades

I have been using WSPR with good success for the past couple of years with my original QCX. Always have used NIST website for time -- they claim that the time tick is corrected for network delays. I

I have a guide for Mac users but windows users can use the same avrdude directives described here. But you will need USBAsp device. It is

Item sold.

I have compiled the code for the APRS-W transmitter but the upload fails. The error message is for this failure. Any suggestions? Arduino: 1.8.13 (Windows 8.1), Board: "ATmega1284, Yes (UART0),

Tony N)BPA In the past there have been comments regarding polarity of the GPS tick affecting clock setting. Nor sure if that is at work here? If relying on NIST via a PC using NTP...there could be

As noted, I see that the time set by the QLG is about 3-4 seconds late compared to NIST UCT. This is enough to cause the WSPR monitors to ignore it. The clock resets whenever I unplug the power line

I am selling my QCX 40M. Firmware up to date 1.05 and 4.5W out @ 13.8V $60 shipped to CONUS QRZ address. Please reply off list.

Tony, My QCX+ paired with a QLG1 matches my QRP-LABS GPS clock and my internet clock within a second. I am using the same method you are using. I am getting power from the PTT port and am feeding the

The QCX challenge is the last Monday of the month at 1300, 1900, 0300 ( next day) on any band you choose although most people choose a band appropriate for the conditions/time. The exchange is your

Steve: I agree. What really frosts my butt is when someone stands up in a crowd and brags that they have a CW WAS award, but they don't know one letter of Morse. I think CW awards on digital modes

I have decided to add a heat sink to the single transistor @10M to dissipate any heat and apply 9 volts to the PA. It works fine, I have 300mw @ 9v and any heat is dissipated because there seems to me

Is there an 80m QCX Challenge? Where are the QCX Challenges announced? Mike K4QET

Hi Hans You were a reasonable signal on 20m QSB 529 - 579. Called you a few times but don’t think you heard me. CU in the next round. 73 Ian G4GIR

Great! I will be there on 40m, in the 1900Z and 0300Z slots.