Looking at tbe wsjt-x screenshot and assuming that is taken with some tx antenna and rx antenna with decent receiver and distance between tx & rx is meters. You should have more lines and thicker

I actually started troubleshooting on your thread, I got it down to = at the end of calibration. It was also off, it got better, but still no spots. Thanks for your help.

"Thanks for the suggestion Kurt. I hadn't thought about that one. You're saying that I could have made the alignment work out better, such that I might have plugged the amp board directly into the

Thanks for the suggestion Kurt. I hadn't thought about that one. You're saying that I could have made the alignment work out better, such that I might have plugged the amp board directly into the

The amp should come in handy ... most of my antennas are in the attic :-) I love those Hammond aluminum boxes. All kinds of colors - pretty decent quality, and fairly inexpensive as well. The amp

"...RG-174 pieces for making the connection. Any suggestions about a better way to do it?" I'd try to mount he board closer to the top of the box, if necessary, and try to use an elevated socket,

Ron wow - very nice. I agree the appearance is much more commanding with the heat sink external. assuming you plan to major on 50 MHz and less - that run of coax is quite short in wavelengths.

a little more data .... running through the relay board - into a dummy load - I have the following output power: 40m 300 mW 30m 150 mW 20m 60 mW the only thing that comes to mind is

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:57 pm, Hans Summers wrote: I'm sorry about my lack of participation in this thread. Things here have been extremely hectic and I'm just back from my 5 day trip to Germany

Hi Bill I'm sorry about my lack of participation in this thread. Things here have been extremely hectic and I'm just back from my 5 day trip to Germany for Friedrichshafen... And more exhausted than I

Alan sent this reply:: How about this one https://groups.io/g/QRPLabs/topic/3827216#9046 ? Hi Alan, Thanks for the link, My take away from that thread is that if the data is not valid or missing, just

Hi Cleve, I see you are using the VFO kits, The issue we are talking about shows up on the check data option on the firmware U3S. Only issue with the QLG1's are that the check data option enabled

Bill, How about this one https://groups.io/g/QRPLabs/topic/3827216#9046 ? 73 Alan G4ZFQ These units

Hi Bill Bill Wrote : "I suspect the YIC5 maker nay have updated their firmware." FYI Bill I have built two new QLG1s (s1.04) received in the last 4 -6 weeks. Both are working fine and lock my Si5351

Thanks for the update. I used Multisim 13 Student Version to simulate the part of the Tayloe detector with the D flip flops and I found that the D flip flops divide the input signal by 4 and gives

Hi Brian, QLG1's fail on V3.10 and V3.12. I have no fix data on these wit the the new QLG1's. Bill

Hi Alan, I have done a search, and never found a solution. These units are recent builds and a previous older build works 100 percent. The only issue with the new builds is the fix data does not

Has Anyone made a picture of the wire from pin 11 of the microcontroller to the Si5351A's Clk2 while doing his U3 to U3S modification? Please share it for me, Thanks

P.S. Correction to the link I typed wrongly: the VFO page is on http://qrp-labs.com/vfo 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com

I feel sure this has been discussed and explained before by Hans. Maybe he is busy and not seen this thread, a search of old posts could find the answer. 73 Alan G4ZFQ