Re: Off topic:
I think because it's in reply to a radio-related post. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 73, Gwen, NG3P
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:47 PM ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote: We all know most government is low power but why comment here?
|
|
Re: Off topic:
ajparent1/KB1GMX
We all know most government is low power but why comment here?
Allison ------------------------------- Please reply on list so we can share. No private email, it goes to a bit bucket due address harvesting
|
|
Re: QCX-SSB Help what do I do now?
#qcx
RACHAEL SANDERS
Nah it’s the QSX.......still under development.
|
|
Re: Off topic:
jjpurdum
Jim: Talk about gov't delays. When I lived in Indiana, the Legislature raised the minimum property tax rate, but also the assessed value rate. My property taxes went from $1167/yr to $4223/yr overnight! There was literally a revolution throughout the state. In Marion country, voters threw out every Councilman who supported the increase--18 out of 23! The Legislature saw the error of their ways and said that, if voters would support a 0.5% increase in the sale tax, they would roll back the property tax changes. Voters said ok. It took them 16 days to approved and implement the higher sales tax rate, and 3 years to change the property tax rates. Lesson learned: If you accept an increase in one for a reduction in the other, they both go into effect on the same day. Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, May 29, 2020, 11:09:37 AM EDT, Jim Manley <jim.manley@...> wrote:
Hi Ted and Hans, I'm so glad you provided that glimpse of Akihabara (especially the photos), as my post had already grown far too long. Family and friends have diagnosed themselves as suffering from my 200 wpm "diarrhea of the fingertips"! Of course, when I said that I lived on the base at Kamiseya, I lied. I was on a 2-2-2-80 shift schedule that two day watches 7 AM - 3 PM, eight hours off (the dreaded double-back), two graveyard watches 11 PM - 7 AM, eight hours off, two evening watches 3 PM - 11 PM, and then 80 hours off. The first 24 hours were spent sleeping, and the.remainder I lived at ... Akihabara! The yen-dollar exchange rate was as high as 270:1, but it got as low as 165:1, while I was there, which is now a dream lost to time, with the current rate around 108:1. Our cost-of-living allowance changed to theoretically keep our purchasing power constant, but for some reason, whenever the rate went down, it took months to be reflected in our pay, but the moment it went up, BAM, our pay was reduced! Ah, to dream, perchance to sleep ... Jim KJ7JHE Lame Deer Montana High School Amateur Radio Club KJ7JKU On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:36 AM Ted 2E0THH <qrp@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: QCX-SSB Help what do I do now?
#qcx
Ryan Flowers
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 8:30 AM <wfcaston@...> wrote: Peter,
|
|
Re: QCX-SSB Help what do I do now?
#qcx
wfcaston@...
Peter,
Where can I get info on the new QCX rig that is coming out probably later this year? Is it possible it is a multi band unit? I am just coming up to speed on my 20 meter QCX, but looking ahead. Thanks, Frank WV4C
|
|
Re: A great QCX-QCX contact and salute to youth
Jim Manley
Hi Ted and Hans, I'm so glad you provided that glimpse of Akihabara (especially the photos), as my post had already grown far too long. Family and friends have diagnosed themselves as suffering from my 200 wpm "diarrhea of the fingertips"! Of course, when I said that I lived on the base at Kamiseya, I lied. I was on a 2-2-2-80 shift schedule that two day watches 7 AM - 3 PM, eight hours off (the dreaded double-back), two graveyard watches 11 PM - 7 AM, eight hours off, two evening watches 3 PM - 11 PM, and then 80 hours off. The first 24 hours were spent sleeping, and the.remainder I lived at ... Akihabara! The yen-dollar exchange rate was as high as 270:1, but it got as low as 165:1, while I was there, which is now a dream lost to time, with the current rate around 108:1. Our cost-of-living allowance changed to theoretically keep our purchasing power constant, but for some reason, whenever the rate went down, it took months to be reflected in our pay, but the moment it went up, BAM, our pay was reduced! Ah, to dream, perchance to sleep ... Jim KJ7JHE Lame Deer Montana High School Amateur Radio Club KJ7JKU
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:36 AM Ted 2E0THH <qrp@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: QCX vs. QCX+ Form Factor Question
Hi Serge
I use these folding feet on my rig which employs very similar boxes to the one destined for the QCX+ https://www.metcase.co.uk/en/Enclosure-Feet/M6420204.htm Roger I have successfully made a bale for the stepper driver box that drives my telescope. I used a coat hanger, one I found with very think wire. Just used a vice, a hammer, some trig and an awful lot of Anglo Saxon. Very pleased with the result. 73s Ted 2E0THH
|
|
Re: QCX Plus 50 Watt PA Combo
George Korper
Tisha, for your intuitive use: Band:20 meters Output: 30 Watts Voltage: 19 V Heatsink: top of QCX + case Longest transmission, 2 ea. 3x3 CQ, followed by QSO basic exchange of OP, QTH and RST, Callsign. normal speed 18 wpm. I have hardly heated up the heatsink so far, so I am thinking, taking your suggestion of leaving on board and drilling a couple of holes in the top of the case and using it as a heatsink. What do you think? George
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:28 AM Tisha Hayes <Tisha.Hayes@...> wrote: It is probably a bad idea to seperate the PA transistors (IRF510) too far from the circuit board. Since they are trying to work together in a push-pull arrangement to drive a few amps of RF current through a transformer at high frequencies you are going to run in to all sorts of problems that will not be easy to predict or replicate for each different installation.
|
|
Re: Heresy follows Re: [QRPLabs] IRF510 #alignment #magic of hollow state
#alignment
#magic
I didn't mean to imply that the HW-16 is my only hollow state electronics - just that it's on the bench.
I recreated my '60s novice station with a rare, and weird, Mosley CM-1 receiver, Heathkit DX-60 transmitter, HG-10 VFO and HD-11 Q-multiplier. -- 73 KD8CGH
|
|
Re: QCX vs. QCX+ Form Factor Question
Roger Hill
I would prefer a wire bail that folds down, rather than folding feet. I find that folding feet (e.g. like on the Drake R8) tend to be flimsy. Roger G3YTN ---
***************************
Roger Hill ***************************
On 2020-05-29 09:51, Hans Summers wrote:
|
|
Re: QCX vs. QCX+ Form Factor Question
Hans Summers
Hi Serge There are no folding feet. If someone has a suggestion, that could become popular. As supplied, it will, as documented, have four self-adhesive feet. 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:20 PM Serge, ON4AA <serge@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: QCX Plus 50 Watt PA Combo
It is probably a bad idea to seperate the PA transistors (IRF510) too far from the circuit board. Since they are trying to work together in a push-pull arrangement to drive a few amps of RF current through a transformer at high frequencies you are going to run in to all sorts of problems that will not be easy to predict or replicate for each different installation.
Determining if the heat sink is sufficient requires quite a few data-points; 1. Power level you will be running at 2. Band you will be operating on 3. SWR that the amplifier sees from the antenna system 4. DC supply voltage and current 5. Duty cycle of the transmitter and mode of operation 6. Type of heat sink (aluminum finned, copper, just a steel plate) 7. Acceptable temperature rise of the PA 8. Thermal conductivity of the junction between the PA and heat sink 9. Convection cooled heat sink or forced air .... You can see why many designers will put some margin in heat sink selection or incorporate devices to measure temperature at the PA to fold back the power or put the amplifier in to protection mode to prevent the magic smoke packets from being released. -- Tisha Hayes, AA4HA Sr Engineer, 4RF Inc.
|
|
Re: Bad news
#40m
Ham Radio
More from a troubleshooting aid point-of-view as components are being replaced when doing a repair.
-- 73, Bernie, VE3FWF
|
|
Re: Battery recommendations for portable ops?
john.rogers@...
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:46 AM, <john.rogers@...> wrote:
I use a second 3S in series with the radio battery to power the 50W ampCorrection: I use a 3S to power the QCX and 2S in series to power the 50W amp. 6S would be too high voltage. John
|
|
Re: QCX vs. QCX+ Form Factor Question
Yes, Hans, I also see potential for your stalagmites not meeting my stalactites :-D On a different note, will the enclosure have a pair of folding feet under the front? I want to avoid getting a stiff neck in the field… (not the US police kind of stiff neck, though.)
|
|
Re: [help] Only noise being seen while IQ balance / phase lo / phase hi.
dl8lrz
Hi,
short test for IC10 Check again whether the marking on the circuit shows the display (ok, already done 100 times) Use a protective resistor Rp approx. 220 Ohm (against unwanted short circuit), do not connect voltages directly to the PINs. Connect voltmeter to PIN7 + 12V via Rp at PIN5 -> PIN7 high, about 12V + 12V via Rp at PIN6 -> PIN7 low, about 0V 0V via Rp at PIN6 -> PIN7 high, about 12V 0V via Rp at PIN5 -> PIN7 low, about 0V Remove Rp Connect PIN7 and PIN6 directly (analog IC10A) -> PIN7 5V +/- (approximately equal to PIN5); if 12V -> IC defective? remove the wire PIN7 - PIN6 if no 5V +/- at PIN7: remove R37 if 5V +/- at PIN7 -> C22 defective ??? if further 12V -> IC10 defective ??? The voltages at PIN7 and PIN1 should be approximately the same.
vy 73 Reiner
|
|
Re: #ocxo
#ocxo
Alan G4ZFQ
regarding the external screen as shown in the OCXO photo for my U3S multiband. I can't put it because it hits the IC1 below. I'd like to ask you if it's important and necessary to put it or it's optional. thanksGiuseppe, I do not understand. What does it touch? IC1 is on the other side of the board. It's pins are seen at the left side, away from the cover. This cover helps to screen and maybe more importantly to stop air currents from affecting the temperature.
|
|
Re: QCX vs. QCX+ Form Factor Question
Hans Summers
Hi Serge Yes, I see... The wide thickness of your assembly is due to the circuit board and the battery holders all adding up as thickness. Well there are some potential ways you could make it fit. The area is large. But 30.5mm is the limit to the depth - this assumes the components above the QCX+ PCB are allowed a height of 12mm. The only components which need this height are the LPF toroids, the electrolytic capacitors, and the 24-turn trimmer potentiometers. So perhaps, with careful orientation, your board could be positioned such that the "high" parts of the QCX+ circuit didn't interfere with the big parts of the battery controller board. Bolt the board to the roof with standoffs and make sure the positioning is such that the stalagmites never meet the stalagmites. OR... use the QCX+ Dev kit board, and separate the battery holders of your assembly, from the board. There seems to be plenty of space to have them side by side. OR... you could make the LPF toroids in the QCX+, and the capacitors and 24-turn trimmer pots, lie down - where necessary? The QCX+ PCB has lots of spare area so there is room to make things like down like that. Several options - but will take some experiment! 73 Hans G0UPL http://qrp-labs.com
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:11 PM Serge, ON4AA <serge@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: #ocxo
#ocxo
Roger Hill
Sorry Giuseppe...I cannot help as I have never built one, but I am sure there are others here who can help. Roger G3YTN ---
***************************
Roger Hill ***************************
On 2020-05-29 07:15, GIUSEPPE wrote:
|
|