Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Alan G4ZFQ
Let's throw some logic at the target.Jim, Sorry I do not understand what you are trying to prove. Ted has quoted 5.88 volts at pin 5 0f IC10. Measured with his DVM. This approximately 1/2 the supply voltage which is what one expects from the potential divider. So - either the +12 volt end of R40 isn't making the trip or the ground end of R39 isn't.Which would give a big error when measuring pin 5 voltage. Perhaps you can explain why pin 6 is at 5.36 volts. Where does that come from? 73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Dear James and Alan
Thank you so much for helping me out here. I'll be back on the case in about 90 minutes and will report. James, I am thinking about just trying small wire bridges to isolate which one is open circuit. 73s Ted M7ECH
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Hi, guys
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Let's throw some logic at the target. My B&K 2405 meter tells me that when my Fluke 111 is measuring the resistance of a 10K resistor it is putting about 0.115 volts across the resistor. In other words, it's not turning on any semiconductors. Especially silicon ones. Assuming that the radio draws 100 ma on receive, let's substitute a 1200 ohm resistor for the radio, making a network of 2 10K resistors with a 1200 ohm across the open ends. A triangle. The 1200 ohm resistor takes the place of the rest of the radio. If we put an ohmmeter across one of the 10K resistors, then short the 1200 ohm resistor, we will get about 5300 ohms with the circuit "normal" and 5000 with a short across the 1200. So - either the +12 volt end of R40 isn't making the trip or the ground end of R39 isn't. Jim Daldry W4JED
On 1/15/19 4:12 AM, Alan G4ZFQ wrote:
Battery disconnectedTed,
|
|
Ronald Taylor
Patrick, the output of the BS170s is a square wave with lots of harmonics. The low pass filter removes the harmonic energy leaving only the fundamental. It’s normal to see a reduction in measured power after the harmonic parts are removed. I’ve worked on 3 QCX20s and 3.5 watts out is the best I’ve ever obtained. I think all is normal here. Ron
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:33 <hb9fkp@...> wrote:
|
|
Dieter, DH1HD
Hallo Lbr OM Patrick, es ist schon viel darüber geschrieben worden, einfach mal div. Beiträge durchsuchen. Tatsache ist, das es hier schon mehrere User hier gab, wo die Leistung beim 20 Meter QCX nicht ausreichend war. Bei meinem 20 M QCX habe ich die Kondensatoren C25,26, 28, 29 sowie den C30 gegen bessere ausgetauscht und es war eine deutliche Leistungssteigerung messbar. Schau bitte auch mal meine eingestellten Bilder an. 73 de DH1HD, Dieter -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: hb9fkp <hb9fkp@...> An: QRPLabs <QRPLabs@groups.io> Verschickt: Di, 15. Jan. 2019 13:29 Betreff: [QRPLabs] QCX 20m little Watt on output #problem Hello all Who can help me? At 13.5 volts I have just 3.5 watts at the L1 HF-output pin. The BS170 has 5.2 watts at all three. The windings are according to the description. The varnish of the winding wire is all good. The values are: 1 = 5.2 W 2 = 4.7 W 3 = 4.2 W 4 = 4.7 W 5 = 4.2 W 6 = 2.0 W 7 = 5.2 W 8 = 2.1 W What could be the problem? Thank you for your interest and help. Best 73... Patrick
|
|
Hans Summers
Hi Patrick You have NO problem. The QCX built-in RF power meter, like most peak- or RMS- detecting power meters, will only be accurate if a sine wave is applied. The waveform at the BS170 drains is VERY non-sinusoidal. The display reading 5.2W here is completely meaningless. The measurement is only meaningful when it is a sine wave which means, at the output of the LPF. 3.5W is not a bad power at 13.8V on 20m. 73 Hans G0UPL
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 15:29 <hb9fkp@... wrote: Hello all
|
|
hb9fkp@...
Hello all
Who can help me? At 13.5 volts I have just 3.5 watts at the L1 HF-output pin. The BS170 has 5.2 watts at all three. The windings are according to the description. The varnish of the winding wire is all good. The values are: 1 = 5.2 W 2 = 4.7 W 3 = 4.2 W 4 = 4.7 W 5 = 4.2 W 6 = 2.0 W 7 = 5.2 W 8 = 2.1 W What could be the problem? Thank you for your interest and help. Best 73... Patrick
|
|
2m u3s
M0RON
Hi all,
I've been working on a vhf u3s, 2m produces around 20mW and 6m 50mW's, with standard pa and inductor, this can be increased but the single bs170 gets very hot. I am going to try a T37-17 20-200mhz as the inductor and a RD15HVF1 as pa. The inductor will be wound as 25 turns single winding and a 10 turns bifalar winding. I have the OCXO and the output is very stable but 0.02w from my location isn't going to get far, initial reception tests have been promising, my problem is a big lump of a hill to the north and east, about half a mile away which blocks vhf signals. Has anyone else tried this combination of inductor and pa? I have parts ready to fix to board, I converted a clock kit that I acquired to u3s spec, waiting for a processor and then I can begin experiment. To start with I'm going to use short fly leads to attach pa and inductor to main board enabling me to make changes easily. -- The universe is made up of Protons, Neutrons, Electrons but contains only one M0RON.
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Alan G4ZFQ
Battery disconnectedTed, That means look at pin 6. 73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Hi again Alan and James
Battery disconnected IC10 p5 to ground = 5.33K PCB battery terminals shorted IC10 p5 to ground = 5.33K Just pondering what that means 73s Ted M7ECH
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Hi Alan
Just about to get stuck in again and saw yours and James' posts. Yes the voltages readings were taken under fault conditions with my DVM Fluke (I only have a few seconds window when the set works) I am pretty certain it is a 10k Alan but will get a camera in there to check. Both ends are soldered and the set performed flawlessly for nearly a month. I will run James' tests and report back, huge thanks James and Alan (and everyone else on the safety advice), 73s Ted M7ECH
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Alan G4ZFQ
James wrote:
If it fails these 2 tests you have a connection problem at pin 5.Ted, Are your voltage readings taken when the fault is present? If so then surely pin 5 is correct? (James, Ted is using his DVM which is not loading the circuit like Hans' figures show.) I'm concerned about pin 6 which should be connected to pin 7 by R38, as there should be no other DC connection to pin 6 it should therefore be close to the pin 7 voltage. Is R38 soldered? Check it's value, that each end is actually connected to the IC pins. Check the resistance from pin 6 to ground. 73 Alan G4ZFQ
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Roger Hill
I think the resistance tests would be done with the battery disconnected...DO NOT intentionally short the battery itself.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Of course the voltage checks would need the battery connected, but at that stage you are not shorting anything. Roger G3YTN Roger --- *************************** Roger Hill ***************************
On 2019-01-15 02:13, Bill Cromwell wrote:
Ted,
|
|
Re: QCX 30 and case for sale
Michael Witham
Sold. Thanks!
|
|
QCX 30 and case for sale
Michael Witham
As much as I regret, I do not have time for the build let alone operations at present due to professional duties. When I retire, this will change!
I offer an unboxed kit and QRP-LABS case for $65.00. I am available at mdwitham@.... Paypal accepted after contact: mdwitham I will continue to follow and learn!! Kd4kld
|
|
Re: Help Needed QCX Kit parts R17 and R24 installed in reverse
Stuart Cameron Vk5ade
Hello everyone and thank you for your replies.
Hi Juan, Ken, thank you for this info. Joe, re flowing the solder and wick did actually work. In inspection of the the holes and track every thing looks OK. My concern now are the pots OK internally. With the DVM what should I measure to confirm that I have not damaged them internally. Before I put them back into the board or should I replace with new ones. Regards Stuart Vk5ade
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Bill Cromwell
Ted,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Do not intentionally short the battery terminals out. If you do be sure to wear adequate eye protection. Have a new fuse on hand and the present fuse between your crowbar and those battery terminals. Batteries can and do explode when the terminals are shorted out. 73, Bill KU8H
On 1/14/19 8:37 PM, James Daldry W4JED wrote:
Hi, Ted --
bark less - wag more
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
Hi, Ted On the top side of the board, check the resistance from pin 5 of IC10 to ground. It should be around 10K. Now short the battery terminals out. It should now be about 5K. If it fails these 2 tests you have a connection problem at pin 5. If you connect your voltmeter to pin 5 (top side, not bottom) and then connect the battery it will probably start at 5-ish volts and gradually drift upward. That's your 5 seconds of audio. One end of R39 should be zero ohms to battery negative and the other end zero ohms to pin 5 of IC10, measured on the top of the board. I keep stressing "top of the board" because there may be a bad solder joint or an open piece of foil at pin 5. The break may be invisible. It's possible that R39 is open but so unlikely that I would exhaust all other possibilities before changing it out. Oh, the other foil that could have a problem is from R39 to ground. Jim Daldry W4JED
On 1/14/19 2:01 PM, qrp@...
wrote:
Just a quick update.
|
|
Re: Another QCX on the air
#qcx
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:52 AM, Chopper wrote:
Chopper, I've ordered the QRP Guys antenna and tuner and this is what I intend to run with it. This setup was for testing the new board and I used what I had on hand. I need buy a bnc - bnc cable for such things.
|
|
Re: Help with strange audio fault
#qcx
OK
That's me done for tonight, no closer as yet. One curious thing, I am running from a battery and while I was looking through settings I turned on the battery level icon, however it is empty. Probably unrelated and some other setting is incorrect. 73s from Cambridge UK Ted M7ECH
|
|