Re: AD9850/51 module pc boards

Steven Dick

I would recommend the TI TLV75733PDBVR for a 5V to 3.3V regulator. It uses an SOT23-5 package, is relatively low noise, and inexpensive (.86 at Mouser.) I have used the 5V version with excellent results. The "super cap" is a good circuit but doesn't help high frequency performance. It is best used in low frequency power supply applications. simple regulator will more than do the job in a compact and low cost solution. Here's a link to the Mouser part:
-Steve K1RF

-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Weddig via Groups.Io
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2018 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: [PHSNA] AD9850/51 module pc boards


anohter idea: i just read in an Analog Devices app note that the jitter
of the reference clock has a large influence of the overlall jitter
performance of the DDS. From my own experience a well regulated and low
noise supply to the xtal osc and also TCXO will improve the phase nosie
performance of the reference clock and therefore minimize the jitter.

The best known low noise regualtor is the LT3045-- unfortunately not
cheap and sometimes hard to get due its large demand. Another idiea ist
o use a "super cap" i.e. an emitter follower with a large cap from the
the base to ground. This cap will be multipleid wth the hfe of the

I had the idea for a piggy back pcb on the chinese units, but never
tried. See the attached schematic file.


Am 30.09.2018 um 05:34 schrieb Terry VK5TM:
Updated pics with the 3.3v reg underneath the Xtal osc.

I have moved some things around to shorten the length of tracks between IC output, transformer and pin at the edge of the pcb.

Will leave this alone for a day or two, firstly so any comments can be added/updated and secondly, I find getting away from a design sometimes suggests improvements that can be made or something shows that has been missed (like a power track missing in the first set of pics).

Join to automatically receive all group messages.