toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
there a number of CQWW multipliers that aren't used in the ARRL
contests, like Labrador?
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 1/26/2020 2:42 PM, ve3ki wrote:
Go to <https://n1mmwp.hamdocs.com/faq/#other-questions>
and look at the answer to the 9th question in the list in that
You can try simply exporting the Cabrillo file and editing the
header, but before submitting it, examine it closely to ensure
that the sent and received exchanges have been recorded correctly
for both W/VE and DX contacts. Since the two contests have
different exchanges, there is a chance that one or more of the
exchange fields may not have been exported to the Cabrillo file
correctly (e.g. a sent or received exchange showing an ARRL
section instead of a state, or a received exchange for a DX
station that is empty instead of displaying the zone). There are
no guarantees that the Cabrillo file exported from one contest
type will be correct for a different contest type.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:53 PM, John N0TA wrote:
I was playing around with the 160 CW contest this
weekend, and make a bonehead mistake: I setup the N1MM log for
the ARRL 160, not the CQ 160 CW contest. I thought I could
change the Log Type, but you can't. I then exported the ADIF
file and tried to import it into a CQ 160 CW log - can't do
Is there a way to change the Log Type?