Ulrich, I see nothing obvious, but you are getting a bunch of "message lost" about every 26 minutes (well: 1426 and 14:52). Is anything scheduled to run around that interval or time? Losses do seem

[] I meant to comment earlier... SSDs have a limited number of writes, so I would not employ them in a path with lots of writing. Lots of reading suits them very well indeed. Cheers, David --

Ulrich Here my last hints. As a teacher you don't only have this sharp eye but you ask again, if you feel your questions have not been answered. Having said that ... The multiplexed image file

An: <MSG-1@...> Von: "David J Taylor" <gm8arv@...> Datum: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:28:56 -0000 Betreff: Re: [MSG-1] Re: not yet perfect,

An: MSG-1@... Von: "ernstlobsiger" <ernst.lobsiger@...> Datum: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 16:56:43 -0000 Betreff: [MSG-1] Re: not yet perfect,

Hi, I have followed this thread with great interest even though I don't run MRTG and don't intend to. *snip========= I have never seen an entry file_delivery_speed in either recv.ini or

David Inspite of a great deal of help form Alan and others, for which I am very grateful,I am still in deep trouble with Metop. I am wondering if it would be best to uninstall every thing including

Hello Alan It might well be that you have never seen quite a number of parameters that can actually be set either in recv.ini others in recev-channels.ini. Nevertheless these parameters exist and may

Geoffrey, I'm sorry, but the trial period lasts 30 days, fixed. All I can suggest is that you order the software, and continue to try and get the receive side working. Many people are receiving

An: MSG-1@... Von: "ernstlobsiger" <ernst.lobsiger@...> Datum: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:24:53 -0000 Betreff: [MSG-1] Re: file_delivery_speed Antwort

Hello Geoffrey Do not worry too much at the moment about Metop Manager as it is of little use until you start to receive Metop data again. When Metop files are flowing in to your receive folder

Von: "ernstlobsiger" <ernst.lobsiger@...> Datum: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:24:53 -0000 Ernst, as mentioned yesterday, I looked deeply into that chapter describing the various

[] [] Ulrich, The way directories are processed differs between the different channels. In the cases where I have said that you are /required/ to use a specific sub-directory of the

An: <MSG-1@...> Von: "David J Taylor" <gm8arv@...> Datum: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:46:30 -0000 Betreff: Re: [MSG-1] Re: file_delivery_speed Antwort

OK, but I thought I should confirm. Ulrich, Renaming a file across directories (on the same disk) is only slightly less efficient than renaming it within a single directory - certainly far fewer

Clear sky view of west and center Europe is stunning :) http://rxsat.sh.cvut.cz/IMG_ESS_SERV/HRV_Europe-20110308-1145.jpg Image is 5,568px × 2,320px and 1,891.24 KB. -- Martin Bruchanov Skype

Ian Thank you for your offer. Since last having contact with you I have removed all traces of Ram Disk and with the correction of an error in recv-channels.ini ................data is flowing once

Good to hear you are getting data again, Geoffrey. Just a reminder, folks, that TeamViewer can do a nice job of remote access, without interfering with EUMETCast:

David Both yesterday and to day I have at last got data flowing to my C:&#92;received file. I have immediately found two oddities in Metop Manager There is nothing in the Events Log except a start

-------------------------------------------------- Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:07 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] New to Metop Geoffrey, As this is a question about my