Well, I was serious in suggesting a small write-up Douglas. My experience here started with a thin-wire Ethernet system where three PCs were strung together using 50-ohm cable, T-pieces and

receive MSG. can see three use Win98SE and one XP Pro. Basil, My opinion, for what it's worth, would be to use the lowest spec PC for the Receiver PC (900Mhz 256MB), and replace the Win98 SE

David, Thank you for your prompt reply and suggestions. Hey-ho here we go again, more upgrades. What a splendid idea David, thank you. Regards, Basil Haigh Pritchard.

David, I have four PC's and I wish to network two from the following to receive MSG. 1. 900MHz/256Mb Win98SE 2. 2GHz/512Mb Win98SE 3. 1GHz/768Mb Win98SE 4. 1.8GHz/512Mb XP

Thanks Alan Should have picked up on that one. :-( Roger

David, Yes, that explains it, they're coming in nicely now. Thanks, Paul wrote: come

Roger, The delayed Write failure causes bad data to be written to all drives on the system, so once it happens you are dead in the water. Alan

Alan I can't understand why you had to format your D: drive. I set my systems up with multiple partitions precisely for the reason that I can reload Windows and programs on the C: (formatting if

LargeSystemCache. Well, what a disaster! No a good choice, Alan! Sorry to hear about the problem. See: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=323608 "SYMPTOMS Your computer may stop

slowest Reception needs about 500MHz/256MB, processing ideally 1GHz+ and 512MB-1GB. What spec is your slower PC? David

You will need to wait until about 90 minutes after the images are made, so about 16:30 before you can expect the 15:00 images to come in. Cheers, David

Hello, For the reception of MSG using two PC's of different specification,would it be better to place the hardware on the slowest machine and the software on the fastest, or vice versa? I would be

Hi folks, Being very interested in what the Windows cache is up to, when I came across a hack which was supposed to improve the performance of the cache and I/O I thought I'd try it. It came from

In message <bsphij+i4cm@...>, Paul Telco <paul@...> writes Coming in fine here Paul - sorry to say for you! James -- James Brown

Hi Paul, I'm receiving FSD regurarly, the PID is still 301. Regards Nicola

Hello, For the first time in months I thought I would look at some FSD images and found that I am no longer receiving them. I am still getting LRIT though and both LRIT and FSD are selected to

Sorry "typo" error should of course have read channel 2 and 3 Ian.

--- In MSG-1@..., "Ian S Deans" <ian@i...> wrote: [] > If all fails I will need to get my Athlon 3200 on order. Ian, rather than waste money on a fatser processor, perhaps get a

--- In MSG-1@..., "Ian S Deans" <ian@i...> wrote: [] > Unfortunately we have to take everything that comes in on channel 1 and 2 even although David's program will quickly delete the data