-------------------------------------------------- Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 4:10 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag now Windows 7. It is an interesting learning

-------------------------------------------------- Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 4:13 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag now Windows 7.

Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:54 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag now Windows 7. [] .. a tale of two Deans! Seriously, both your feedback has been useful and I've

Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:00 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag now Windows 7. [] OK. My ASUS P4P800 deluxe on my Pentium 4 HT PC was fine. I had also wondered

I have just done a clean install of Windows 7 64-bit ( was running 32-bit RC ) and I have to say that I have been very pleased. Eumetcast now up and running for 9 hours without a single loss and all

-------------------------------------------------- Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 7:13 AM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag Apparently ACPI problems with ASUS boards and

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:04 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag [] Oh, dear, Douglas, what a tale of woe! Let's see if we can help... Cooling, CPU getting too

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:50 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag [] Understood about the mstDefrag problem, Alan. Thanks for the explanation of how you use

Douglas, If you look into the autostart.ini it will tell you which programme it uses to start the install on your CDs. If you right mouse click on the install program and go into properties and

-------------------------------------------------- Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:24 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag So far, and I only clean installed Windows 7 a

David J Taylor wrote: It lost functionality as though it was unregistered. Got a feeling I mixed up my keys when upgraded PC last Xmas. I used windows defrag on a daily schedule overnight with no

Now why didn't I think of that? Simple and very clever. Alan David J Taylor wrote:

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:24 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag If you still have version 2, that may work. It's what I'm using..... That's fine. My software

Thanks for the mail David. I tried every compatibility option that was available but it still tells me that the program is incompatible with the OS. It is the only problem I have come across since

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:20 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag What sort of problems, Alan? It's worked on all the systems where I've tested it. I believe it's

Hi Ian I used to run MSTDefrag but ran into problems and gave up on it after a year or two of success. I have recently discovered MyDefrag which can be scheduled to run weekly or monthly as required.

Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:17 PM To: <MSG-1@...> Subject: Re: [MSG-1] mstDefrag Ian, I continue to practice, and would recommend, using a background defragmenter - msfDefrag in

Thanks for your mail Bernard. Certainly in our hobby the huge number of files being continually added and removed does cause a lot of fragmentation. I would have thought that a badly fragmented

Although I cannot comment on Vista or Win 7 64-bit, I can challenge your assertion that running Eumetcast without defrag is unwise. In my opinion and experience over the past 4 or 5 years, with only

I would be interested to know if anyone is running mstDefrag ( version 3.00 or 3.60 ) with either Vista 64-bit or Windows 7 64-bit. I have used both these versions without the slightest problem on