Lost tellicast(icon red) at Canary Islands at 8:30 gmt -----Mensaje original----- De: MSG-1@... [mailto:MSG-1@...] En nombre de nigel heasman Enviado el: sábado, 13 de mayo

--- Peter Green <pete@...> wrote: Hi I have just lost Telecast on both systems at 0845 GMT although I am getting an 80% signal from Hotbird I have red T's on both systems, is it

Lost here in Turin... I have lost some segments overnight. Not a problem, anyway Hope receiving soon... Ciao Giuseppe -----Messaggio originale----- Da: MSG-1@...

No Pete, so have I. Eumetsat do appear to have been having a lot of problems overnight and early morning. I don't run overnight, but saw the messages. Regards Ian.

Hi I have just lost Telecast on both systems at 0845 GMT although I am getting an 80% signal from Hotbird I have red T's on both systems, is it me? Pete

Hi, ramdisk is finally fitted on my PC... it's 256M wide, so I use it also for some scheduled jpeg and avi. "Solid state disk" board ( the one posted by Jakub ) costs something like 120-150 euro,

Hi all, I'm sure I'm missing something in this sunny morning, but on Eumetsat's site there are this informations: PID: 300 (HotBird-6 & AtlanticBird-3) PID: 1922 (NSS806) Channel: EUMETSAT Data

Release 2006.05 of xrit2pic is now available: http://www.alblas.demon.nl/wsat/software/soft_msg.html You can find here also bzip2, needed for AVHRR. For Windows there is also a new installer; which

nigel heasman wrote: [] Nigel, The parallel running should give a chance for EUMETSAT and software developers to sort out any problems, so that nearer the time the service goes operational there can

--- David J Taylor <gm8arv@...> wrote: Folks, Unless you have a real need to use MSG-2 data, I would suggest that you hold off getting the data until later on in the trial. The data will be

Robert Moore wrote: Robert, If I recall correctly, at sub-satellite point, in resolution order: Met5/6/7: thermal & WV channel: ~4.5 km resolution MSG-1: visible & thermal channels 1..11 - 3 km

Douglas I thought I had read this on a EUMETSAT website, but as I can't find it again I must be mistaken. I've only found a comparison with Met-7 so I suppose it's possible that I misread that ....

Indeed Ulrich, a RAMdisk is much faster than disk. As a direct result datatransfer does require less CPU time. Tellicast takes less than 5% CPU on my P3@1GHz. So the rest is availabe for decoding the

Thanks to John and David for the info. I wasn't 100% sure if the stream protocols and addresses were being referred to - I don't think they are is it seems to relate to further distribution, but it

discussion James, I am using this version at the moment and everything is ending up where it should. On the 15th?....well we'll wait and see. As I said, I want to see how my setup copes with it...and

James Brown wrote: [] James, I am unsure if the multicast address is something we need to worry about, or whether the TelliCast software handles this automatically. Any input welcome! In my own

In message <nX6FMXB5WHYEFwee@...>, James Brown <satellite@...> writes Good to see this has now gone and we have the full region of Iraq once more available. Thanks

In message <e41alt+f2j1@...>, seggins2000 <seggins@...> writes (snip) Interesting John. As Spock might say - it may be a recv-channels.ini file, but not as we know it!! I notice

# TelliCast only: Definition for Channel Subscription of local Receiver [EUMETSAT Data Channel 1] # Section per channel or channel group identified by # channel name (wildcard "*" allowed at end of