You need data channel 3, please see: http://www.david-taylor.myby.co.uk/wxsat/atovs/index.html If you are using the MSG Data Manager, please ensure that data from both channels 2 and 3 is saved to

Dear all, somehow we don't seem to be receiving any MPEF products. Does anyone know what channel they are on? And where is the FSD? Extra registration required? We are currently receiving data

Douglas, David - sorry to sound so ignorant, but are we able to open these files with our existing software? Robert Quoting Douglas Deans

David, it was in GSS - and I was able to recreate the error a number of times, usiong both View tab and File|Open one. But after dinner (2030 BST) the outlines registered correctly.

Hot Bird transponder 11096 down again. No Eumetcast or TV programs on the transponder from about 19.02 UTC Douglas

registering with the In what program? Clciking the current GOES-E image in the MSG Data Manager produces a perfect country boundary overlay for me.... Cheers, David

Am I alone in having the data for N. American via FSD not registering with the country outlines? USA seems to be off the globe (no comment!) Robert ------------------------------ Professor Robert

Since 1458z today I have a series of MPEF files in my received directory. I have not seen these before. L-000-MSG1-MPEF-CLM-000001-200310211500 Some are CLM, TH, TOZ, CLA, CTH, AMV and CLAI. Peter

In message <001501c397d9$b2ee87a0$0100a8c0@douglas>, Douglas Deans <douglas@...> writes Very strange Douglas, when I came back in this afternoon and saw the messages I thought

Perhaps someone will explain to me someday why Eumetsat refer to scans as repeat cycles in their messages. Would it not be better to just say, for example, scan 11.30 rather than repeat cycle 11.30.

wrote: David is right Wayne, I almost forgot the most important drawback of W98 (that is FAT32 in general): You can only store 10.292 files with long filenames in one folder on this file system

It depands how you value your time! .. and I don't hink he's the only one with Home. Should be fine. Can't you get a discounted Windows 2000 Pro cheaper, though? here 73, David

wrote: Hi David, Well someone had to look at the cheaper alternatives for a two PC system to gather the data, Hi! I'm tempted to consider XP Home instead of XP Pro, since Trevor G0JIX around the

.. to handle a large number of files properly, particularly when they have long file names, you need NTFS. Cheers, David

.. or Windows 2000. I would regard 256MB as tight, and would recommend an install of Windows 2000 (preferred because of lower memory consumption) or XP with the minimum possible