|
Re: SOME progress
Excellent!
I wish I could discipline myself to have more patience!
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web: https://www.satsignal.eu
Email:
Excellent!
I wish I could discipline myself to have more patience!
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software for you
Web: https://www.satsignal.eu
Email:
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33207
·
|
|
Re: SOME progress
Thanks David, I'm not trying to do too much at once; one channel at a time. Yes, I now have Metop-B. IODC later today. Busy with grandchildren!
Robert
Thanks David, I'm not trying to do too much at once; one channel at a time. Yes, I now have Metop-B. IODC later today. Busy with grandchildren!
Robert
|
By
Robert Moore
·
#33206
·
|
|
Re: SOME progress
Robert,
I remain puzzled by your statement.
Thinking out loud...
If you can receive the Basic Service you should be able to receive any data on
that service equally well. Now I know that some
Robert,
I remain puzzled by your statement.
Thinking out loud...
If you can receive the Basic Service you should be able to receive any data on
that service equally well. Now I know that some
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33205
·
|
|
Re: SOME progress
Ernst (and others) last night I acquired Metop-C imagery, so maybe we have solved the dish-pointing issue - or are close to a resolution. Fingers still crossed.
Robert
Ernst (and others) last night I acquired Metop-C imagery, so maybe we have solved the dish-pointing issue - or are close to a resolution. Fingers still crossed.
Robert
|
By
Robert Moore
·
#33204
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 06:30 AM, David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ wrote:
Of course, the beam from the dish (thinking about it as a transmitter) will
not be just a constant
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 06:30 AM, David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ wrote:
Of course, the beam from the dish (thinking about it as a transmitter) will
not be just a constant
|
By
Ernst Lobsiger
·
#33203
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
SNR can depend on the bandwidth in which the signal is measured, not sure what
the white dotted lines are supposed to represent - perhaps the nominal channel.
I've attached a 200 MHz scan taken very
SNR can depend on the bandwidth in which the signal is measured, not sure what
the white dotted lines are supposed to represent - perhaps the nominal channel.
I've attached a 200 MHz scan taken very
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33202
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:13 AM, <geojohnt@...> wrote:
I hadn't noticed that - the meter does show 13 dB SNR so how can the LM be 1.2 dB???John,
yes this never ending story is good for some more
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 04:13 AM, <geojohnt@...> wrote:
I hadn't noticed that - the meter does show 13 dB SNR so how can the LM be 1.2 dB???John,
yes this never ending story is good for some more
|
By
Ernst Lobsiger
·
#33201
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
Ernst,
Now that is strange?
I hadn't noticed that - the meter does show 13 dB SNR so how can the LM be 1.2 dB???
My current SNR with a 1 m dish, Inverto Black Ultra quad LNB and an SR1 is 13.5 dB and
Ernst,
Now that is strange?
I hadn't noticed that - the meter does show 13 dB SNR so how can the LM be 1.2 dB???
My current SNR with a 1 m dish, Inverto Black Ultra quad LNB and an SR1 is 13.5 dB and
|
By
geojohnt@...
·
#33200
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
Robert,
Sorry to hear about the lack of progress!
You can download the current MSG Data Manager here, where the release notes are
summarised:
Robert,
Sorry to hear about the lack of progress!
You can download the current MSG Data Manager here, where the release notes are
summarised:
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33199
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
Robert,
Mmmmm.
Was the meter resting on the 'back' of the dish when the photo was taken?
Hence the view of the tree?
The adjacent channels (????) are quite low as well, so it looks(?) like trees are
Robert,
Mmmmm.
Was the meter resting on the 'back' of the dish when the photo was taken?
Hence the view of the tree?
The adjacent channels (????) are quite low as well, so it looks(?) like trees are
|
By
geojohnt@...
·
#33198
·
|
|
Re: not much more progress
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:55 PM, Robert Moore wrote:
A lot of effort by two engineers this morning resulted in raising the SNR to 8.2Robert,
TBH I don't understand another request for a photo. Your
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 02:55 PM, Robert Moore wrote:
A lot of effort by two engineers this morning resulted in raising the SNR to 8.2Robert,
TBH I don't understand another request for a photo. Your
|
By
Ernst Lobsiger
·
#33197
·
|
|
not much more progress
A lot of effort by two engineers this morning resulted in raising the SNR to 8.2
Iโm getting perfect HRIT imagery and broken RSS. Metop-B seems to be in a loop repeating the same GAC pass over and
A lot of effort by two engineers this morning resulted in raising the SNR to 8.2
Iโm getting perfect HRIT imagery and broken RSS. Metop-B seems to be in a loop repeating the same GAC pass over and
|
By
Robert Moore
·
#33196
·
|
|
RSS monthly Meteosat-10 mission interruptions
A reminder that it's the monthly 48 hour Rapid Scan interruption next week:
https://www.eumetsat.int/rapid-scanning-service-schedule
"These temporary outages in the service are used to exercise
A reminder that it's the monthly 48 hour Rapid Scan interruption next week:
https://www.eumetsat.int/rapid-scanning-service-schedule
"These temporary outages in the service are used to exercise
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33195
·
|
|
Re: some progress
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 02:37 AM, James Brown wrote:
And let us hope it was precision engineered!
JB
Robert,
if the dish was "precision engineered" and looking again at your 75mm lens shot it could
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 02:37 AM, James Brown wrote:
And let us hope it was precision engineered!
JB
Robert,
if the dish was "precision engineered" and looking again at your 75mm lens shot it could
|
By
Ernst Lobsiger
·
#33194
·
|
|
Re: some progress
Ernst, I have a new engineer coming Sunday mid-forenoon โ fingers crossed. I havenโt really kept up with current developments, having no reception, and I suspect a lot has changed since Christmas.
Ernst, I have a new engineer coming Sunday mid-forenoon โ fingers crossed. I havenโt really kept up with current developments, having no reception, and I suspect a lot has changed since Christmas.
|
By
Robert Moore
·
#33193
·
|
|
Re: GOES-18
Hi David
Thanks - I missed that
Kind Regards
Graham
Hi David
Thanks - I missed that
Kind Regards
Graham
|
By
g-woolf@sky.com
·
#33192
·
|
|
Re: GOES-18
Graham,
Yes! The update was last month! Please see:
https://www.satsignal.eu/software/updates.html
It works with the EUMETSAT test data, but obviously not tested with the real
data which
Graham,
Yes! The update was last month! Please see:
https://www.satsignal.eu/software/updates.html
It works with the EUMETSAT test data, but obviously not tested with the real
data which
|
By
David J Taylor GM8ARV ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ ๐ช๐บ
·
#33191
·
|
|
GOES-18
Hi David
I see that GOES-18 is about to be disseminated over Eumetcast
https://www.eumetsat.int/parallel-dissemination-goes-18-abi-data
Will there be an update to the GOES ABI Manager to take the data
Hi David
I see that GOES-18 is about to be disseminated over Eumetcast
https://www.eumetsat.int/parallel-dissemination-goes-18-abi-data
Will there be an update to the GOES ABI Manager to take the data
|
By
g-woolf@sky.com
·
#33190
·
|
|
Re: Mrtg problem
Thank you Graham.
Yes indeed re Windows 11, and specifically Eumetcast data and all our probs.
James
Thank you Graham.
Yes indeed re Windows 11, and specifically Eumetcast data and all our probs.
James
|
By
James Brown
·
#33189
·
|
|
Re: Mrtg problem
Thanks everyone. However the mrtg that is not running is on a Windows 10 machine. My windows 11 machine has it running properly.
The error message results from an attempt to run a .cfg
Thanks everyone. However the mrtg that is not running is on a Windows 10 machine. My windows 11 machine has it running properly.
The error message results from an attempt to run a .cfg
|
By
seggins2000
·
#33188
·
|