Ian S Deans <ian@...>
David,toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I thought that the program handled the missing segment problem at 11.30 UTC
pretty well. I know this is probably wrong, but the impression I got was
that the program waited to see if it was a late segment problem and at a
particular point in the next cycle decided the segments were missing and
saved the images on the 11.30 cycle accordingly. Seems a very reasonable way
of dealing with the problem.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Taylor" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: [MSG-1] Re: Apologies
--- In MSGemail@example.com, "Ian S Deans" <ian@i...> wrote:Sorry -- that last message should have gone through the SatSignalgroup -- so many groups !!