Re: Apologies

Ian S Deans <ian@...>


I thought that the program handled the missing segment problem at 11.30 UTC
pretty well. I know this is probably wrong, but the impression I got was
that the program waited to see if it was a late segment problem and at a
particular point in the next cycle decided the segments were missing and
saved the images on the 11.30 cycle accordingly. Seems a very reasonable way
of dealing with the problem.



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Taylor" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:43 PM
Subject: [MSG-1] Re: Apologies

--- In, "Ian S Deans" <ian@i...> wrote:
Sorry -- that last message should have gone through the SatSignal
group -- so many groups !!

Well, at least it was talking about MSG-1 software, and the issues
that the dissemination of data have caused. I saw the program could
not handle completely missing segments, though, such as happened at


Join to automatically receive all group messages.